
TMF Health Registry Summit 2026
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to TMF Health Registry Summit 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
TMF Health Registry Summit 2026
Event type: Healthcare data registry, clinical research, public health analytics, patient outcomes, medical records, health informatics, policy, and quality improvement summit
Estimated attendance: Likely a focused professional audience of healthcare registry leaders, clinicians, researchers, data managers, quality teams, public health stakeholders, solution providers, and association members. Final attendance will depend on the host organization’s registration model and whether the summit is open to members only or broader industry participation.
Buyer-list value: High, if your client sells to healthcare data, clinical operations, registry management, quality improvement, analytics, compliance, or health technology buyers.
1️⃣ Who attends: Buyers / attendees
This is not a broad consumer healthcare event. It is a specialized professional summit, which usually means the attendees are highly relevant decision-makers, technical users, and budget influencers inside hospitals, health systems, research institutions, payer organizations, and healthcare technology companies.
The strongest buyer profiles typically include:
- Clinical registry managers and registry coordinators
- Health information management leaders
- Quality improvement directors
- Population health and outcomes research teams
- Clinical informatics professionals
- Data governance and reporting managers
- Research program managers
- Public health analysts and epidemiology teams
- Hospital executives involved in compliance and performance improvement
- Healthcare software, data services, and analytics vendors
- Medical association staff and accreditation stakeholders
The best part for attendee-list research is that events like this often include a very valuable mix of end users and influence holders. That means the audience can support sales for software, reporting tools, registry systems, data services, training, compliance solutions, and consulting services.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
Location: The exact venue and city should be confirmed from the summit’s official event page or registration page. If you share the client website or event page, I can refine this section with precise location intelligence.
Likely attendee origin: Depending on the summit’s scope, attendance may be national, regional, or global. Health registry and clinical data meetings often draw a strong domestic audience from hospitals, health systems, and research centers, while also attracting international attendees if the event is tied to a medical society or a specialty-focused registry network.
How to think about geography:
- If hosted by a national medical or registry association, expect a national U.S. audience with some international participation.
- If hosted by a hospital network or state registry program, the audience may be more regional or state-based.
- If the summit includes technology vendors or research collaborators, the reach may extend globally through healthcare analytics and registry communities.
3️⃣ Audience reach: Local / National / Global
Most likely reach: National with niche global relevance
This kind of summit usually has a concentrated professional audience rather than massive footfall. That is a benefit for attendee-list sales because the audience is more targeted. If the summit is tied to a recognized health registry organization, the event can have strong national reach across hospitals, research groups, clinical departments, and healthcare technology firms.
Best interpretation:
- Local: If the summit is tied to a single city, hospital, or regional chapter
- National: If it is a recognized U.S.-wide registry or healthcare data summit
- Global: If there are international registry, clinical outcomes, or interoperability participants
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a sample buyer table with healthcare, diagnostics, analytics, health technology, clinical research, and medical services organizations that would be good buyer fits for a health registry summit. These are examples of buyer-side accounts, not exhibitors only.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Epic Systems | epic.com | Product Manager, Interoperability / Healthcare Data Strategy Director | Strong fit for registry workflows, EHR integration, data capture, reporting, and clinical analytics. |
| 2 | Oracle Health | oracle.com/health | Health Data Platform Manager / Clinical Solutions Director | Healthcare data infrastructure and registry interoperability are highly relevant to summit themes. |
| 3 | Philips | philips.com | Clinical Informatics Manager / Outcomes Analytics Lead | Relevant to patient monitoring, healthcare data, and clinical performance improvement. |
| 4 | GE HealthCare | gehealthcare.com | Healthcare IT Director / Clinical Applications Manager | Good fit for hospital systems, imaging data, quality reporting, and clinical workflow solutions. |
| 5 | IQVIA | iqvia.com | Registry Operations Director / Real-World Evidence Manager | Excellent fit for registry data, clinical research, and outcomes analytics. |
| 6 | Optum | optum.com | Healthcare Analytics Director / Population Health Solutions Manager | Strong buyer fit for population health, claims data, quality programs, and care coordination analytics. |
| 7 | HIMSS | himss.org | Digital Health Partnerships Director / Events & Member Strategy Lead | Relevant ecosystem buyer for healthcare informatics, standards, and professional community engagement. |
| 8 | 3M Health Care | 3m.com | Healthcare Solutions Manager / Clinical Improvement Director | Good fit for quality improvement, healthcare efficiency, clinical documentation, and process optimization. |
| 9 | Labcorp | labcorp.com | Medical Affairs Manager / Data & Reporting Director | Relevant for diagnostics data, clinical research support, and healthcare data management. |
| 10 | Quest Diagnostics | questdiagnostics.com | Clinical Data Services Manager / Laboratory Informatics Director | Strong fit for registry reporting, diagnostic data, and medical outcomes tracking. |
| 11 | UnitedHealth Group | unitedhealthgroup.com | Health Services Research Director / Quality Measurement Manager | Fits large-scale healthcare measurement, claims analysis, and population health initiatives. |
| 12 | Medidata | medidata.com | Clinical Data Strategy Manager / Research Technology Director | Very strong fit for clinical trial data, registry alignment, and life sciences data workflows. |
| 13 | Vizient | vizientinc.com | Quality Improvement Director / Hospital Analytics Manager | Good fit for provider performance, benchmarking, and healthcare quality improvement. |
| 14 | Amwell | amwell.com | Healthcare Platform Partnerships Manager / Product Marketing Director | Relevant for digital healthcare workflows, patient data, and care delivery reporting. |
| 15 | Elsevier Health | elsevier.com | Clinical Solutions Director / Healthcare Data Product Manager | Good fit for evidence-based healthcare content, decision support, and registry education. |
Top buyer accounts to prioritize first: Epic Systems, Oracle Health, IQVIA, Optum, and Medidata. These five are especially strong because they sit close to healthcare data, analytics, workflow, and registry-related decision-making.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
This event has a specialized B2B audience, so your targeting should focus on decision-makers and operational leaders who work with clinical data, registry programs, reporting, analytics, quality improvement, and healthcare operations.
Best job profiles to target:
- Director of Clinical Informatics
- Registry Program Manager
- Quality Improvement Director
- Healthcare Data Analyst
- Health Information Management Director
- Population Health Manager
- Research Operations Manager
- Clinical Research Program Director
- Medical Affairs Manager
- Hospital Analytics Manager
- Interoperability Product Manager
- Healthcare IT Director
- Outcomes Research Lead
- Compliance and Reporting Manager
- Public Health Informatics Specialist
Best industry filters to use:
- Hospital & Health Care
- Medical Devices
- Pharmaceuticals
- Biotechnology
- Research
- Information Technology & Services
- Information Services
- Computer Software
- Health, Wellness & Fitness
- Management Consulting
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Public Policy
- Government Administration
- Higher Education
- Nonprofit Organization Management
Event type fit: Healthcare registry summit, clinical outcomes conference, healthcare analytics meeting, quality improvement summit, patient data and informatics forum, health technology networking event.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance: expected total footfall
Without the official event listing in hand, the safest estimate is a mid-sized professional summit audience. These events usually do not have massive consumer-like footfall, but they can still deliver high-value leads because the audience is much more specific.
Estimated attendance range: 300 to 1,500 attendees, depending on scope, membership base, and whether the summit includes exhibitors, breakout sessions, and sponsor participation.
How to read the footfall:
- Smaller summit: 200–500 attendees
- Mid-sized professional summit: 500–1,500 attendees
- Large national healthcare summit: 1,500+ attendees
If your client is buying attendee data, quality matters more than volume here. Even a smaller summit may be very valuable because the audience can include senior healthcare decision-makers and specialized registry leaders.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Health registry summits usually center around data quality, standardization, reporting, outcomes, and operational improvement. The most valuable buyers will be those who influence purchasing for systems, analytics, compliance, or service partnerships.
Key focus areas:
- Clinical registries and registry operations
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Patient outcomes and performance measurement
- Data governance and interoperability
- Health informatics and reporting standards
- Research data management
- Public health tracking and analytics
- Hospital and health system process improvement
- Medical software and technology adoption
- Compliance, benchmarking, and evidence generation
Buyer engagement angle: The best messaging is based on outcomes, efficiency, accuracy, and compliance. For example:
We help healthcare teams connect with registry leaders, clinical data managers, quality improvement decision-makers, and health informatics professionals who are actively involved in data capture, reporting, and performance measurement.
This kind of message is much stronger than saying “we sell attendee lists,” because it positions the list as a strategic targeting asset for healthcare B2B campaigns.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
I should review your client’s website before finalizing the exact best-buyer list. That matters because the ideal buyers change significantly based on what your client sells.
If your client sells healthcare software or analytics tools:
- Target healthcare IT directors
- Clinical informatics managers
- Registry operations directors
- Quality improvement leaders
- Data governance teams
If your client sells consulting or services:
- Target health system executives
- research program managers
- outcomes research leads
- compliance teams
- clinical operations leaders
If your client sells medical devices, diagnostics, or laboratory products:
- Target medical affairs teams
- lab operations leaders
- clinical research managers
- hospital quality leaders
- healthcare procurement-influencing stakeholders
To make this truly precise, please share your client website. Once I review it, I can narrow the buyer list to the exact best-fit companies and job titles for this summit.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
This summit is a strong target if your client sells into healthcare data, registry management, informatics, outcomes measurement, research, or quality improvement.
Best buyer categories to collect:
- Healthcare technology vendors
- Hospital and health system analytics teams
- Clinical registry managers
- Quality improvement leaders
- Research and evidence generation teams
- Medical affairs and healthcare consulting firms
Lead quality rating for attendee-list sales: 8.5/10
The audience is smaller and more specialized than a mass-market expo, but the buyer quality can be excellent. If the summit is well-attended by registry leaders, clinical informatics professionals, and health system decision-makers, it can become a highly valuable source for targeted healthcare B2B outreach.
Next step: Send me the client website, and I’ll refine this into a sharper buyer-fit version with the best companies, titles, and industry filters matched to the product.
Data sheet
| Event Name | TMF Health Registry Summit 2026 |
| Event Date | 17 June 2026 – 18 June 2026 |
| Event Status | Completed |
| Venue | Berlin; specific venue not publicly confirmed in the available source set |
| City | Berlin |
| State / Region | Berlin |
| Country | Germany |
| Organizer | Not publicly confirmed in the available source set; event branding suggests a TMF-affiliated healthcare registry meeting, but organizer confirmation is required |
| Official Event Website | Official event page not publicly confirmed in the available source set |
| Event Type | Healthcare data registry, clinical research, public health analytics, patient outcomes, medical records, health informatics, policy, and quality improvement summit |
| Primary Category | Medical & Pharma |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | IT & Technology; Science & Research |
| Audience Reach | Likely National, with DACH and European specialist relevance |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. Likely a focused professional audience rather than a mass-footfall exhibition. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Estimated / unconfirmed |
| Main Purpose of Event | To convene registry leaders, clinicians, researchers, data managers, quality teams, public health stakeholders, and health technology participants around registry strategy, outcomes measurement, data quality, governance, interoperability, and evidence generation. |
TMF Health Registry Summit 2026 appears to be a specialist healthcare data and registry-focused meeting centered on clinical registries, patient outcomes, health informatics, quality improvement, and research-grade data use. Based on the event theme provided, the summit is positioned as a professional knowledge-sharing and stakeholder engagement forum rather than a broad public exhibition, making the attendee base more concentrated in high-value institutional and technical roles.
For suppliers selling registry technology, data capture tools, interoperability solutions, analytics platforms, clinical research support, compliance software, quality reporting systems, or consulting services, this type of summit can be commercially relevant because the audience typically includes budget holders, program owners, technical evaluators, and governance stakeholders. Even where direct purchasing is not immediate, the event is likely to support long-cycle healthcare B2B relationship building, pilot discussions, partnership development, and evidence-led solution positioning.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical registry managers and coordinators | University hospitals, clinical registry offices, disease-specific registry operators | Operational influence over registry workflows, vendor evaluations, data quality tools | High relevance for registry software, eCRF tools, workflow automation, and data validation platforms |
| Clinical informatics and health IT leaders | Hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, digital health programs | Technical evaluation, integration approval, interoperability planning | Important for EHR integration, FHIR-based exchange, master data, analytics, and platform architecture |
| Quality improvement and outcomes leaders | Hospitals, specialty care networks, quality institutes | Influence over KPI reporting, benchmarking, and performance improvement initiatives | Strong buyers for dashboards, outcomes analytics, reporting systems, and audit-ready data solutions |
| Clinical research and epidemiology teams | Research institutes, university departments, study networks, public health organizations | Use registry data for evidence generation, studies, post-market surveillance, and publications | Relevant for data platforms, biostatistics support, consent management, and secure research environments |
| Data governance, privacy, and compliance teams | Hospitals, registries, research organizations, public institutions | Approval and risk management for data collection, sharing, retention, and access controls | High-value audience for privacy, security, consent, audit trail, and governance vendors |
| Public health and policy stakeholders | Government health bodies, public health institutes, statutory healthcare organizations | Program influence, policy alignment, standards adoption | Relevant for population health analytics, surveillance systems, and interoperable reporting tools |
| Hospital operations and program managers | Clinical service lines, care pathways, specialty centers | Budget influence tied to service-line performance, accreditation, and operational reporting | Good fit for workflow systems, case tracking, patient follow-up, and registry-connected operational tools |
| Health technology and solution providers | Healthcare software firms, analytics vendors, interoperability providers | Partnership, channel, integration, and ecosystem influence | Useful for strategic alliances, co-selling, white-label, and implementation partnerships |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berlin | Host-city hospitals, universities, digital health actors, public institutions | High | Berlin is a strong hub for healthcare research, policy dialogue, digital health, and conference attendance |
| Berlin region | Regional healthcare networks, registry teams, clinical researchers | Medium to High | Accessible for day-trip attendance and institutional participation |
| Germany national market | University hospitals, disease registries, quality institutes, public health stakeholders, research consortia | Very High | Most likely core audience base given the subject matter and event branding |
| DACH region | Austria and Switzerland registry, clinical research, and informatics participants | Medium | Likely specialist interest due to common language and comparable healthcare data environments |
| Wider Europe | Select researchers, registry operators, vendors, and policy collaborators | Low to Medium | Possible for specialist networks, but international breadth is not publicly confirmed |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| National | Primary classification | The summit topic aligns most strongly with Germany-based hospitals, registry operators, health data researchers, and institutional healthcare stakeholders. |
| Regional / European specialist relevance | Secondary | The subject matter can attract selective DACH and EU participants, especially around interoperability, outcomes research, and policy exchange. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin | University hospital | Major academic medical center with strong registry, research, clinical data, and outcomes infrastructure relevance | charite.de | Director Clinical Informatics; Registry Manager; Research Program Manager; Data Governance Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Berlin Institute of Health at Charité | Research institution | Highly relevant for translational research, data-driven care, and structured clinical datasets | bihealth.org | Program Manager; Research Data Manager; Clinical Data Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Robert Koch Institute | Public health institute | Relevant for population health data, surveillance, registries, and evidence-based public health programs | rki.de | Public Health Data Lead; Epidemiology Program Manager; Registry Analyst | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg | University hospital | Known type of institution likely to operate specialty registries and outcomes programs | klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de | Quality Director; Registry Coordinator; Clinical Research Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| LMU Klinikum | University hospital | Relevant for patient outcomes, specialty registries, academic clinical data, and digital health operations | klinikum.uni-muenchen.de | Clinical Informatics Lead; Data Quality Manager; Outcomes Program Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf | University hospital | Large clinical and research environment suitable for registry and quality benchmarking solutions | uke.de | Registry Manager; Director Quality Improvement; IT Integration Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt | University hospital | Relevant for hospital data operations, care quality, and clinical research data capture | kgu.de | Clinical Data Manager; Registry Lead; Research Operations Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| AOK-Bundesverband | Payer / statutory health insurance association | Relevant for outcomes, quality reporting, health data evaluation, and population health analytics | aok-bv.de | Director Health Data; Outcomes Analytics Lead; Quality Program Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| BARMER | Payer / statutory health insurer | Relevant buyer-side organization for healthcare quality, reporting, and patient outcomes analytics | barmer.de | Population Health Manager; Data Governance Lead; Healthcare Analytics Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft | Healthcare association / standards body | Relevant because oncology registries and quality frameworks are common summit themes in registry ecosystems | krebsgesellschaft.de | Quality Manager; Program Director; Registry Standards Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Director of Clinical Informatics | Clinical Informatics / IT | Director | Owns integration, data workflows, and technical solution evaluation |
| 2 | Registry Manager | Registry Operations | Manager | Day-to-day owner of registry processes, data quality, and vendor usability |
| 3 | Clinical Data Manager | Data Management | Manager | Key evaluator for data capture, validation, reporting, and governance tools |
| 4 | Quality Improvement Director | Quality / Clinical Operations | Director | Links registry outputs to care quality, benchmarking, and accreditation needs |
| 5 | Head of Research Data Management | Research | Head / Director | Important for secure data environments, interoperability, and evidence generation |
| 6 | Program Manager, Outcomes Research | Research / Medical Affairs | Manager | Uses registries for longitudinal insights, publications, and real-world evidence |
| 7 | Data Governance Manager | Governance / Compliance | Manager | Critical for consent, privacy, retention, and access-control decisions |
| 8 | Chief Medical Information Officer | Executive / Informatics | C-Level | Senior sponsor for strategic digital clinical data initiatives |
| 9 | Clinical Operations Director | Operations | Director | Can connect registry use to operational reporting, service line efficiency, and care pathways |
| 10 | Public Health Analytics Lead | Public Health / Analytics | Manager / Director | Relevant for surveillance, policy reporting, and registry-linked public health programs |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hospital & Health Care | Core event audience for registries, outcomes, and clinical data operations | Hospital registry systems, quality analytics, interoperability, patient follow-up |
| 2 | Research | Relevant for clinical studies, real-world evidence, and structured datasets | Registry-linked research data platforms and analytical support |
| 3 | Higher Education | University hospitals and academic centers often sit under higher education structures | Academic data infrastructure, research governance, and institutional registry support |
| 4 | Information Technology & Services | Important for solution providers, integrators, and healthcare IT partners | Interoperability, implementation, managed services, data architecture |
| 5 | Computer Software | Common category for registry platforms, analytics tools, workflow systems, and compliance software | SaaS outreach, platform partnerships, product demos |
| 6 | Government Administration | Public health and policy-side participants may shape adoption and reporting frameworks | Population health reporting, surveillance systems, public registries |
| 7 | Public Policy | Relevant where registry output informs quality frameworks, reimbursement, and governance | Policy-aligned analytics and standards support |
| 8 | Biotechnology | Biotech and translational research groups often use registry and outcomes data | Real-world evidence, post-market studies, disease registries |
| 9 | Pharmaceuticals | Outcomes and registry datasets can support therapeutic evidence, safety, and market access needs | Evidence partnerships and registry data programs |
| 10 | Medical Devices | Device manufacturers rely on outcomes data, follow-up, and post-market evidence | Device registry support, surveillance, and quality reporting |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer | Unconfirmed | No official attendance figure available in the available source set | Likely a focused specialist audience rather than a high-volume expo |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official exhibitor directory publicly verified | May be limited if the summit is conference-led rather than exhibition-led |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official buyer breakdown publicly verified | Attendee quality is likely stronger than volume given the specialist theme |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Agenda or speaker page not publicly verified in the available source set | Speaker organizations would be useful for account targeting once verified |
| Historical attendance | No prior-year official attendance figure verified | Historical data unavailable | Prior-year official event metrics not confirmed | Further validation recommended before list-purchase or volume-based forecasting |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical registries | Structured data capture, workflow consistency, follow-up management | Demonstrate operational efficiency and data completeness improvements | Registry platforms, eCRF tools, patient tracking systems |
| Health informatics | Interoperability, standards-based exchange, IT integration | Position around integration readiness and reduced manual data movement | FHIR tools, APIs, HL7 connectors, data architecture services |
| Patient outcomes and quality improvement | Benchmarking, KPI visibility, performance insights | Show measurable impact on reporting accuracy and care quality initiatives | Dashboards, quality analytics, benchmarking platforms |
| Public health analytics | Population-level insight, surveillance, trend analysis | Frame use cases around evidence-based policy and monitoring | Analytics environments, reporting engines, population health tools |
| Clinical research data | Research-grade datasets, reproducibility, secure access | Engage around multi-site studies and evidence generation needs | Research data management, secure data rooms, statistical support |
| Data governance and compliance | Consent, privacy, role-based access, auditability | Lead with risk reduction and governance assurance | Consent management, audit logs, security controls, governance consulting |
| Medical records and documentation quality | Cleaner clinical data and lower documentation burden | Demonstrate workflow simplification and improved data trust | Documentation optimization, coding support, structured forms |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | High | The summit theme aligns well with hospital, registry, research, and health data decision-makers. |
| Decision-maker availability | Medium to High | Specialist conferences often include senior program owners and technical influencers, though some procurement decisions remain committee-based. |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Good for niche lead qualification, but list scale may be limited if attendee data is not publicly accessible. |
| Apollo targeting potential | High | Strong title-, department-, and institution-based targeting is possible across hospitals, research organizations, and health technology firms. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Germany-first targeting, then DACH expansion, is commercially logical for this event profile. |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use insight-led messaging around data quality, interoperability, outcomes reporting, and compliance rather than generic product pitches. |
| Overall lead quality | High | Specialist healthcare data events usually produce fewer but more qualified leads than broad healthcare shows. |
| Best use case | High | Best suited for ABM, targeted attendee profiling, niche healthcare outreach, and partnership development. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Current-year participant verification is limited in the available source set, so claims of attendance should not be made without official lists. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Hospital & Health Care; Research; Higher Education; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Government Administration; Public Policy; Biotechnology; Pharmaceuticals; Medical Devices | Build a core audience around healthcare providers, research bodies, and enabling technology firms |
| Departments | Information Technology; Engineering; Operations; Research; Quality Assurance; Medical / Clinical; Legal / Compliance; Data / Analytics | Capture both operational owners and strategic evaluators |
| Seniority | C-Level; VP; Head; Director; Manager | Prioritize decision-makers and program owners while retaining hands-on system evaluators |
| Job titles | Chief Medical Information Officer; Director Clinical Informatics; Registry Manager; Clinical Data Manager; Data Governance Manager; Quality Improvement Director; Research Data Manager; Outcomes Research Manager; Program Manager; Head of Digital Health | Target high-fit registry, outcomes, and informatics roles |
| Geography | Germany first; then Austria; Switzerland; optionally Benelux and broader EU specialist accounts | Align with likely event catchment and language/regulatory relevance |
| Employee size | 201–500; 501–1,000; 1,001–5,000; 5,001+ | Focus on hospitals, academic centers, and enterprise healthcare organizations with implementation capacity |
| Keywords | registry, register, outcomes, real-world evidence, quality improvement, health data, clinical informatics, interoperability, FHIR, medical records, patient registry, epidemiology, research data | Narrow search toward event-relevant healthcare data programs |
| Technologies, if relevant | EHR, HL7, FHIR, data warehouse, analytics stack, interoperability tools | Useful for integration-focused outreach and compatibility messaging |
| Revenue range, if relevant | Mid-market to enterprise institutions | Helps prioritize accounts with greater budget and multi-site complexity |
| Company type | University hospitals, public hospitals, research institutes, healthcare associations, public health institutions, health IT vendors | Improves account relevance and event-fit targeting |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| User-supplied event brief | Primary input | Event name, city, region, country, and dates; thematic description and likely audience profile | High for provided fields; not sufficient alone for attendee verification |
| TMF e.V. official website | Organizer context | Used only as organization-context reference for TMF branding; current-year event-specific details were not publicly confirmed in the available source set | Medium |
| Official event page / agenda / attendee list | Primary source sought | Specific event website, venue, organizer, agenda, speakers, exhibitors, sponsors, and attendance figures were not publicly confirmed in the available source set at time of writing | Not available |
| Institutional websites listed in sample buyer table | Buyer-side organization validation | Confirmed that listed hospitals, research institutes, payer bodies, and associations are real organizations relevant to healthcare registry, outcomes, research, or public health work | High for organization existence; not proof of event attendance |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to TMF Health Registry Summit 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.