🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to Educause — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
EDUCAUSE Conference (Higher Education IT & Digital Leadership) — Global Event Research & Buyer Targeting Guide
Quick Snapshot
- Event Title: EDUCAUSE
- Primary Industry / Theme: Higher Education Technology, IT Leadership, Digital Transformation, Cybersecurity, Data/Analytics, Enterprise Platforms, Teaching & Learning Technology
- Typical Audience Type: Executive IT buyers, higher-education CIO/VPs, enterprise architects, security leaders, system administrators, campus digital leaders, vendors and solution providers
- Best Buyer List Use Case: Building an attendee/buyer database of higher-ed IT decision-makers and enterprise technology stakeholders for outreach, partnerships, pilots, and procurement conversations
1️⃣ Who attends (BUYERS / ATTENDEES)
EDUCAUSE is best understood as a higher-education IT leadership and technology marketplace where the “buyers” are usually not corporate procurement teams, but rather technology decision-makers inside universities and colleges. Attendees include a mix of senior executives, operational IT leaders, and practitioners who influence purchases and vendor evaluations.
Primary attendee/buyer segments we typically target:
- CIOs / CTOs / Senior IT Executives (campus-wide leadership of systems, infrastructure, and digital strategy)
- Vice Presidents / Directors of IT (enterprise IT, application ecosystems, enterprise systems, and digital services)
- Information Security Leadership (CISO, security directors, security program managers, incident response stakeholders)
- Enterprise Architecture & Cloud Leaders (cloud migration, platform modernization, integration and API strategy)
- Data, Analytics & Institutional Effectiveness Leaders (data governance, BI, analytics platforms, student success reporting)
- Identity & Access / IAM Leaders (SSO, MFA strategy, identity lifecycle management, access governance)
- Teaching & Learning Technology Stakeholders (LMS, learning analytics, instructional technology)
- Infrastructure & Operations Leaders (networking, endpoint management, systems operations, service management)
- Vendors & Solution Providers (software, cybersecurity, cloud, identity, analytics, managed services, education tech and integrations)
In practical terms, the most valuable buyers for attendee-list sourcing are the people who: own budgets, approve pilots, define roadmaps, influence vendor selection, and manage enterprise IT priorities.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
EDUCAUSE events are primarily hosted in major U.S. cities (depending on the specific EDUCAUSE event/annual schedule), with a strong national attendee base from across the United States. Because higher education institutions recruit internationally for certain technical roles and because vendors and researchers participate globally, there is also an international component.
Typical geographic origin patterns:
- Primary: United States (majority of campuses, IT leadership, and vendor teams)
- Secondary: Canada and select international regions via partner participation and global vendor representation
- Institutional concentration: Large public universities and private research institutions (often with national and international brand recognition)
Best targeting approach we use for geographic fit:
- National U.S. coverage (most campus IT leaders attend)
- Focus on major metro areas when the event is held there (local density increases enterprise networking and executive attendance)
- Vendor-origin targeting (global enterprise vendors bring teams from multiple regions)
3️⃣ Audience reach (Local / National / Global)
EDUCAUSE has national reach with meaningful global brand presence. The attendee ecosystem is dominated by U.S. higher education institutions, but many technology vendors participate with multinational teams and global product messaging. That combination makes EDUCAUSE a strong event for companies selling: enterprise IT platforms, security programs, identity systems, cloud modernization, data/analytics, and technology services tailored to higher ed.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names (BUYERS ONLY) + Websites
Below is a buyer-focused sample list of organizations we typically recommend targeting for attendee-list sourcing. These are the kinds of institutions and buyer-side organizations that are aligned with EDUCAUSE’s higher-ed IT buyer community. We include websites so that teams can validate the organization immediately.
Important note: Because EDUCAUSE attendance varies by year and track, we recommend building the attendee buyer list with job-title-based filtering for accuracy.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Michigan | https://umich.edu | CIO / Chief Information Officer | Large-scale enterprise IT with ongoing modernization, security programs, identity initiatives, and digital services. |
| 2 | Arizona State University | https://asu.edu | Vice President, Information Technology | High digital transformation maturity; strong demand for cloud, identity, analytics, and institutional technology governance. |
| 3 | Ohio State University | https://osu.edu | Executive Director / Director of IT Security | Major security and compliance needs across a complex campus enterprise and ecosystem of applications. |
| 4 | University of Florida | https://ufl.edu | Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) | Strong cybersecurity posture and enterprise risk management aligned with EDUCAUSE security tracks. |
| 5 | University of Texas at Austin | https://utexas.edu | VP / Associate CIO, Enterprise Applications | Enterprise application transformation, integration work, and identity access modernization for large institution scale. |
| 6 | Stanford University | https://stanford.edu | Director of Enterprise Architecture | Advanced architecture and platform strategy; strong fit for governance, integration, and scalable identity/cloud models. |
| 7 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) | https://mit.edu | Associate CIO / IT Operations Leader | Complex infrastructure and operations environment; high interest in resilient service management and modernization. |
| 8 | New York University (NYU) | https://nyu.edu | Director of Identity & Access Management (IAM) | IAM is a recurring higher-ed priority; large user populations make governance and automation critical. |
| 9 | University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | https://illinois.edu | Director, Data & Analytics Platforms | Data governance and analytics needs across student success and institutional reporting. |
| 10 | North Carolina State University | https://ncsu.edu | Director of Cloud / Platform Modernization | Cloud and platform modernization aligns strongly with EDUCAUSE enterprise tracks. |
| 11 | University of Washington | https://uw.edu | CISO / Security Program Manager | Enterprise security and risk reduction are central needs for large campuses. |
| 12 | Purdue University | https://purdue.edu | Chief Information Officer / Deputy CIO | Strong enterprise IT budget holder and modernization priorities across infrastructure, apps, and identity. |
| 13 | University of Minnesota | https://umn.edu | Director of IT Service Management / IT Operations | Service reliability, operations efficiency, and end-user experience are recurring higher-ed enterprise themes. |
| 14 | University of Pittsburgh | https://pitt.edu | Director, Enterprise Systems | Enterprise platforms and integration needs support strong alignment with application lifecycle and governance topics. |
| 15 | Temple University | https://temple.edu | Senior Director, Information Technology | University IT leadership with practical needs around operations, security programs, and enterprise application delivery. |
| 16 | Case Western Reserve University | https://case.edu | Security & Risk Leader (Director/Manager) | Security and compliance alignment for higher ed identity and data protection concerns. |
| 17 | Georgia Tech | https://gatech.edu | Director, Cybersecurity / Information Security | Strong cybersecurity leadership presence; good fit for security program and platform modernization buyers. |
| 18 | University of Tennessee, Knoxville | https://utk.edu | CIO / IT Leadership | Enterprise leadership for a complex campus environment with persistent modernization needs. |
| 19 | University of Colorado Boulder | https://colorado.edu | Enterprise Data & Governance Leader | Data and governance are key higher-ed priorities; aligned with EDUCAUSE analytics and governance topics. |
| 20 | University of California (UC) System / Campuses (Target specific campus entities) | https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu | Director / Program Lead, IT Governance & Security | System-level governance and multi-campus technology alignment; high likelihood of attending for enterprise initiatives. |
Recommended top 5 to prioritize first (buyer-style): University of Michigan, Arizona State University, Ohio State University, University of Florida, University of Texas at Austin. These represent high-likelihood enterprise IT and security leadership attendance profiles.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target
- CIO / Chief Information Officer
- VP of IT / VP, Digital Transformation
- CISO / Chief Information Security Officer
- Director, Information Security / Cybersecurity
- Director / Manager, Identity & Access Management (IAM)
- Director, Enterprise Architecture
- Cloud Migration Lead / Cloud Platform Director
- Director, Data Governance / Data & Analytics
- Director, IT Operations / Infrastructure
- IT Service Management Leader (ITSM)
- Systems Engineering Lead / Enterprise Systems Manager
- Director, Learning Technology / Teaching & Learning Systems (when the product is LMS-related or learning analytics)
- Procurement-adjacent stakeholders (e.g., vendor management leads, vendor risk owners, contract governance program leads)
Industries (aligned to the event)
EDUCAUSE sits at the intersection of enterprise technology and higher education. For industry targeting, we recommend using these categories (based on the industry taxonomy you provided):
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- Information Technology & Services
- Internet
- Computer Software
- Computer & Network Security
- Program Development
- E-Learning
- Medical/Health sectors can appear via healthcare university systems, but core targeting is still higher-ed IT leadership
Event type
- Industry conference / technology conference
- Executive and practitioner tracks (leadership + hands-on sessions)
- Vendor ecosystem focused on higher-ed IT challenges
- Community-driven thought leadership (best practices, governance, policy, and operational excellence)
6️⃣ Estimated attendance (expected total footfall)
EDUCAUSE events typically draw thousands of attendees. Because the exact footprint varies by year and event format (Annual Conference vs. other EDUCAUSE gatherings), we estimate the EDUCAUSE conference attendance in the range of: ~4,000 to 8,000 attendees for major multi-day conference formats, with a high density of IT leadership and vendor engagement.
For attendee-list sourcing, what matters most is not just “total footfall,” but the buyer density within tracks: security, identity, enterprise apps, data governance, cloud/platform modernization, and learning technology.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Common key focus areas at EDUCAUSE (what buyers come for):
- Cybersecurity & risk management (governance, incident response readiness, identity security)
- Identity & access management (IAM) (SSO, MFA, lifecycle provisioning, access governance)
- Cloud modernization (migration strategy, cost/FinOps, platform resilience)
- Enterprise applications & integration (ERP/HR/finance ecosystems, SIS/LIS/LMS integrations, workflow automation)
- Data governance & analytics (student success, institutional effectiveness, privacy considerations)
- Operational excellence (IT service management, monitoring/observability, end-user experience)
- Teaching & learning technology (LMS strategy, learning analytics, educational software ecosystems)
- Policy, governance, and compliance (privacy, procurement governance, data retention)
Buyer engagement opportunities we align to list-building:
- Executive networking prompts for CIO/CISO and IT leadership (digital transformation, security roadmap, platform strategy)
- Implementation & architecture hooks for enterprise architecture and IAM teams (integration patterns, identity lifecycle workflows)
- Operational improvement messaging for IT operations and ITSM leaders (service quality metrics, reliability, automation)
- Governance and compliance angle for data and security program stakeholders (risk reduction, privacy alignment)
8️⃣ Client-product fit note (Attendee/buyer list recommendation requires client review)
To recommend the best buyers for EDUCAUSE that match your client’s exact needs, we need the client product website. Please share:
- Client website URL
- What the product sells (1–2 sentences)
- Primary use case (security, IAM, cloud, analytics, LMS, ITSM, procurement governance, etc.)
- Target buyer type (executive leadership vs. practitioner/implementation team)
While we wait for the client website, here is a provisional “best buyer fit map” based on the most common EDUCAUSE buyer priorities:
- If client product is cybersecurity / risk / compliance: Target: CISO, Director of Information Security, Security Program Manager, IAM Security Lead. Best buyer fit: universities with mature security programs and active incident/risk initiatives.
- If client product is identity / access / SSO: Target: IAM Director/Manager, IT Security IAM Lead, Enterprise Architecture (identity integration). Buyer engagement: provisioning automation, lifecycle governance, access reviews, and delegated administration.
- If client product is cloud / platform modernization: Target: Cloud Platform Director, Enterprise Architecture, CIO/VP Digital Transformation. Buyer engagement: migration governance, FinOps alignment, platform resilience, integration patterns.
- If client product is data/analytics / governance: Target: Director of Data Governance, Analytics/BI leader, Institutional Effectiveness technology stakeholders. Buyer engagement: privacy-aware reporting, student success analytics, data governance workflows.
- If client product is learning technology / LMS ecosystem: Target: Director of Learning Technology, Instructional Technology leader, Academic Technology CIO-adjacent roles. Buyer engagement: LMS integration, learning analytics, course delivery ecosystem.
Once we have the client website, we will narrow to the highest-probability buyer titles and institutional profiles, and then we will produce the final prioritized buyer list for EDUCAUSE outreach.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
Yes—EDUCAUSE is a strong event for generating a high-intent buyer database for higher education technology. The main reason is that EDUCAUSE attendees are typically aligned to enterprise IT roadmaps rather than generic consumer audiences. That means the attendee list is most valuable when we focus on: CIO/VP IT, CISO/security leaders, IAM leaders, enterprise architecture, cloud and data governance stakeholders, and learning technology decision-makers.
What we recommend we do next:
- We confirm the specific EDUCAUSE event edition and dates/venue (if you need a precise footfall/venue-based targeting plan).
- We review the client product website to determine the exact buyer personas.
- We build a prioritized attendee/buyer list using job-title and industry-fit logic tailored to higher education IT procurement influence patterns.
Next request from us (required for best buyer accuracy): Please share the client website so we can match the best EDUCAUSE buyer personas precisely.
Data sheet
| Event Name | Educause |
| Event Date | 2026-09-29 to 2026-10-02 |
| Event Status | Upcoming |
| Venue | Not publicly confirmed in the materials reviewed for this report |
| City | Denver |
| State / Region | Colorado |
| Country | United States |
| Organizer | EDUCAUSE |
| Official Event Website | educause.edu/events |
| Event Type | Annual conference / higher education technology and leadership summit |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | IT & Technology; Business Services |
| Audience Reach | Global higher education community with strong North American concentration |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Medium for audience profile; low for exact footfall without current organizer disclosure |
| Main Purpose of Event | Professional networking, technology strategy, procurement discussions, institutional leadership, product education, and solution sourcing for higher education |
Educause is one of the most important annual gatherings for higher education information technology, digital transformation, institutional leadership, and campus operations. The event typically brings together university and college decision-makers, technology leaders, procurement stakeholders, and solution providers who support the academic, administrative, and operational needs of modern institutions.
The event matters because higher education institutions continue to invest in cybersecurity, cloud, AI, data governance, student experience platforms, network infrastructure, identity and access management, and enterprise systems. For suppliers, Educause is a high-value environment for lead generation, relationship building, and institutional buyer targeting across procurement, IT, and operations teams.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher education IT leaders | Universities, colleges, state systems, community colleges | Decision-makers for infrastructure, software, cybersecurity, and digital transformation | Core audience for technology vendors and services providers |
| Procurement and sourcing teams | Campus procurement offices and shared services organizations | Vendor selection, RFP management, contract negotiation | High-value for suppliers seeking institutional contracts |
| CIO / CTO / VP IT | Higher education executive IT offices | Strategic technology and budget oversight | Critical for enterprise solution sales |
| Information security leaders | Security operations, risk, compliance, IAM teams | Cybersecurity, identity, governance, and incident response buying influence | Strong audience for security vendors and managed services |
| Campus operations leaders | Facilities, infrastructure, housing, enterprise operations | Operational system selection and modernization | Relevant for facilities tech, energy, and service providers |
| Academic technology and digital learning leaders | Instructional technology, LMS, digital learning, edtech teams | Influence on teaching platforms and academic systems | Important for education technology suppliers |
| Budget owners and finance stakeholders | Finance, administration, institutional planning | Approval authority for large purchases | Useful for pricing, ROI, and long-cycle sales |
| Associations and consortia | Higher education associations, purchasing consortia | Aggregation of member demand and framework purchasing | Useful for channel expansion and multi-institution reach |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denver metro | Local institutions and regional campuses | Medium | Convenient for Colorado-based universities and vendors |
| Colorado and Mountain West | State universities, community colleges, regional systems | High | Strong regional participation expected due to proximity |
| U.S. national reach | Public and private higher education institutions across the country | Very High | Educause is widely recognized as a national conference for higher ed IT |
| North America | Canadian institutions, vendors, associations | Medium | Likely cross-border presence for higher education technology solutions |
| International | Global higher education and edtech stakeholders | Low to Medium | More limited than domestic reach, but still relevant for suppliers with global higher-ed accounts |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Primary classification | The conference has international recognition, but the most concentrated buyer demand is from U.S. higher education institutions and their suppliers. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California, Berkeley | Public university buyer | Large-scale IT, procurement, and research computing needs | berkeley.edu | CIO, Procurement Director, IT Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Michigan | Public university buyer | Enterprise systems, security, analytics, and campus operations investments | umich.edu | VP IT, Security Director, Sourcing Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Arizona State University | Public university buyer | Known for large digital transformation and technology procurement programs | asu.edu | CIO, Digital Transformation Leader, Category Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Texas A&M University | Public university buyer | Large procurement footprint and enterprise technology demand | tamu.edu | Procurement Director, IT Director, Program Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Texas at Austin | Public university buyer | Major campus technology and research operations spend | utexas.edu | CIO, IT Director, Strategic Sourcing Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Penn State | Public university buyer | Distributed campus systems and complex procurement environment | psu.edu | VP IT, Procurement Lead, Contracts Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Florida | Public university buyer | Broad institutional demand for cloud, security, and administrative systems | ufl.edu | CIO, Security Manager, Procurement Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Washington | Public university buyer | Large IT and research support organization with enterprise buying power | washington.edu | IT Director, Data Platform Lead, Procurement Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| North Carolina State University | Public university buyer | Strong engineering and technology ecosystem; campus systems procurement | ncsu.edu | CIO, Infrastructure Director, Category Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | Public university buyer | High-volume institutional technology and procurement needs | illinois.edu | CIO, Procurement Manager, Security Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | Public university buyer | Advanced computing, research, and enterprise technology demand | gatech.edu | CIO, CTO, Research Computing Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chief Information Officer (CIO) | IT / Executive | C-Level | Owns enterprise technology strategy and major buying decisions |
| 2 | Chief Technology Officer (CTO) | IT / Innovation | C-Level | Influences architecture, platforms, and modernization |
| 3 | Director of Procurement | Procurement / Supply Chain | Director | Manages vendor selection, contracts, and sourcing |
| 4 | Strategic Sourcing Manager | Procurement | Manager | Evaluates suppliers and runs sourcing events |
| 5 | IT Director | Information Technology | Director | Leads systems, infrastructure, and vendor evaluations |
| 6 | Cybersecurity Director / CISO | Security / IT | Director / Executive | Important for identity, compliance, and threat management spend |
| 7 | Data / Analytics Director | Data / IT / Institutional Research | Director | Drives analytics, BI, and data platform purchasing |
| 8 | Facilities Director | Operations / Facilities | Director | Relevant for smart campus, energy, and building systems |
| 9 | Program Manager / Project Manager | PMO / IT / Operations | Manager | Coordinates implementation and deployment cycles |
| 10 | Partnerships Director / Vendor Manager | Partnerships / Procurement | Director / Manager | Manages supplier relationships and strategic alliances |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Information Technology & Services | Central to EDUCAUSE buying cycles | Enterprise software, managed services, IT consulting |
| 2 | Higher Education | Direct institutional buyer base | Campus-wide technology and services |
| 3 | Education Management | Academic administration and education platforms | SaaS, student systems, workflow tools |
| 4 | Computer Software | Primary supplier segment for campuses | Platform selling, product demos, renewals |
| 5 | Computer & Network Security | Cybersecurity is a top higher-ed priority | IAM, SOC, risk, compliance, monitoring tools |
| 6 | Financial Services | Budgeting, payment, and finance systems matter | Payments, tuition, spend management |
| 7 | Cloud / Internet | Cloud migration and digital services are common priorities | Hosting, migration, collaboration, storage |
| 8 | Management Consulting | Advisory support for transformation programs | Strategy, operating model, procurement advisory |
| 9 | Facilities Services | Smart campus and operations optimization | Building systems, maintenance tech, FM tools |
| 10 | Environmental Services | Sustainability and campus operations relevance | Energy, waste, efficiency, ESG solutions |
| 11 | Telecommunications | Network and connectivity remain essential campus needs | WAN, internet, voice, unified comms |
| 12 | Computer Hardware | Devices, endpoints, and infrastructure refresh cycles | Endpoint, server, storage, classroom tech |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Not publicly confirmed | Confirmed absence of public figure | Organizer materials reviewed did not publicly disclose a current attendance number | Use with caution for forecasting |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified current-year exhibitor count located in the reviewed public sources | Likely substantial vendor participation given event profile |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Higher education institutions and teams are the core audience | Buyer count depends on registration mix |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified current-year agenda count located in the reviewed public sources | Likely multiple sessions across key tracks |
| Historical attendance | Prior-year evidence only | Historical / prior-year evidence | Used for directional planning where current-year disclosure is unavailable | Prior-year participation evidence. Not a confirmed attendee list for the current edition. |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cybersecurity | Protect identities, endpoints, data, and networks | Security briefings and risk-based demos | IAM, SIEM, MDR, phishing protection |
| Cloud and infrastructure | Modernize systems and reduce technical debt | Architecture sessions and migration roadmaps | Cloud platforms, storage, backup, networking |
| Data and analytics | Make better institutional decisions | Use-case driven dashboards and governance workshops | BI, data integration, master data management |
| Digital learning | Improve teaching, learning, and student experience | Faculty-focused demonstrations and pilots | LMS, classroom tech, assessment tools |
| Procurement and contract management | Source compliant vendors and manage spend | RFP support and contract discussions | Procurement software, sourcing services |
| Facilities and smart campus | Improve operations and building efficiency | Operational efficiency and sustainability messaging | Facilities tech, energy management, sensors |
| Student systems | Streamline enrollment, services, and support | Student lifecycle and CRM workflows | CRM, SIS integrations, service desk tools |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | Very High | Strong concentration of institution-side decision-makers and influencers. |
| Decision-maker availability | High | CIOs, procurement leaders, and directors are common attendee profiles. |
| Data collection potential | High | Good for speaker, sponsor, exhibitor, and institutional prospect extraction. |
| Apollo targeting potential | Very High | Strong fit for higher education, IT, cybersecurity, and procurement filters. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | National and regional targeting is effective, with Denver as a helpful local angle. |
| Best outreach approach | High-value LinkedIn plus email outreach | Use role-specific pain points: security, cost savings, modernization, and student experience. |
| Overall lead quality | Very High | One of the stronger events for higher education technology and procurement prospecting. |
| Best use case | Event attendee list building and account-based targeting | Best suited for ABM, list enrichment, event follow-up, and institutional sales campaigns. |
| Limitations / risks | Moderate | Current-year attendee, exhibitor, and footfall data may not be publicly disclosed. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Information Technology & Services; Education Management; Computer Software; Computer & Network Security; IT & Services; Management Consulting | Focus on institutions and solution providers serving higher education |
| Departments | Information Technology; Procurement; Operations; Security; Finance; Institutional Research; Administrative Services | Identify decision-making and budget authority |
| Seniority | C-Level; VP; Director; Head; Manager | Prioritize strategic and budget-owning contacts |
| Job titles | CIO, CTO, VP IT, IT Director, Procurement Director, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Security Director, Facilities Director, Program Manager | Capture high-fit buyers and influencers |
| Geography | United States; Colorado; Mountain West; major U.S. metro areas with higher-ed concentration | Support both event-local and national outreach |
| Employee size | 201-500; 501-1,000; 1,001-5,000; 5,001-10,000; 10,000+ | Higher education institutions and large service providers |
| Keywords | higher education, campus IT, student systems, cybersecurity, procurement, digital transformation, cloud, identity management, ERP, LMS | Refine searches by buying intent and event themes |
| Company type | Education institutions, public sector, non-profit, enterprise technology vendors, consulting firms | Focus on buyers and key solution partners |
| Revenue range | Not essential for higher education buyers; use if targeting vendors/consultancies | Optional for supplier-side prospecting |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDUCAUSE Events | Official organizer website | Organizer identity, event family, and official event hub | High |
| EDUCAUSE Main Website | Official association website | Association mission and higher education technology focus | High |
| Visit Denver | Venue/city destination source | City context and travel/access relevance | Medium |
| EDUCAUSE Annual Conference Page | Official conference page | Annual conference positioning and event purpose | High |
| EDUCAUSE Event Listings | Official event listings | Current event family and calendar context | High |
| Publicly reviewed organizer materials | Verification basis | No publicly confirmed current-year attendance, exhibitor count, or full attendee list found in reviewed sources | Medium |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to Educause — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
