
Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2026
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
Design Automation Conference 2026
Event type: Electronic design automation, semiconductors, chip design, AI for engineering, verification, embedded systems, CAD/CAE/CAM, hardware/software tools, manufacturing design flow
Use case: Deep research analysis for attendee-list targeting, buyer identification, and event sales strategy
Important note: Please share your client’s website before finalizing the best buyer shortlist. The ideal targets depend heavily on whether your client sells software, services, data, hardware, training, consulting, recruiting, or event sponsorship solutions. Once I review the website, I can narrow the buyer list much more accurately.
Executive summary
Design Automation Conference 2026 is expected to be one of the most important industry gatherings for professionals involved in chip design, semiconductor engineering, embedded systems, electronic design automation, verification, AI-assisted design, and silicon development workflows. This event is not a generic technology expo. It is a highly specialized, high-value B2B environment where the audience is usually composed of engineering leaders, product decision-makers, R&D executives, technical architects, innovation heads, academic researchers, and procurement-influencing teams from companies that design, build, test, or support advanced electronic systems.
For attendee-list sales, this is a strong event because the buyer profile is highly concentrated. The audience is less about mass footfall and more about quality of contacts. Attendees typically represent companies that invest heavily in design tools, simulation, hardware validation, semiconductor workflows, design services, cloud-based engineering platforms, and technical talent. That means the event can generate strong ROI for vendors selling design software, engineering services, IP, cloud compute, consulting, testing, training, and enterprise technology.
The key to monetizing this event is to segment the audience correctly. The most valuable leads are not just “attendees” in general, but specific decision-makers such as VP of Engineering, Director of EDA, Design Verification Manager, Semiconductor Engineering Manager, ASIC/SoC Lead, CAD/CAE Manager, R&D Director, CTO, Product Engineering Director, and Technical Program Manager. This event also attracts strong academic and research participation, which can matter for clients selling educational tools, simulation software, research platforms, and engineering learning solutions.
1️⃣ Who attends: buyers / attendees
The attendees at this event are primarily technical and commercial stakeholders in the electronics and semiconductor ecosystem. This is a buyer-rich conference because the audience includes both end users and strategic influencers. In many cases, attendees are not merely “interested visitors”; they are the people who evaluate, recommend, compare, specify, or approve tools and technology used in engineering workflows.
Main attendee groups include:
- Electronic design automation buyers and engineering users
- Semiconductor design leaders and chip architecture teams
- ASIC, SoC, and FPGA engineers
- Verification, validation, and functional safety teams
- Hardware and embedded systems architects
- CAD, CAE, and design flow managers
- R&D leaders from electronics, chip, telecom, automotive, aerospace, and industrial tech companies
- AI/ML engineering teams working on design optimization and automation
- Software tool vendors, chip IP providers, and engineering services firms
- University faculty, researchers, and graduate students in electrical engineering, computer engineering, and microelectronics
- Cloud infrastructure providers supporting design workloads
- Recruitment and talent acquisition teams from engineering-heavy companies
The strongest commercial buyers are usually the professionals responsible for engineering tools, design productivity, productivity automation, and engineering transformation. These are the people most likely to buy software demos, enterprise licenses, design services, technical subscriptions, consulting, and workflow solutions.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
Event location: The exact venue and city for Design Automation Conference 2026 should be confirmed from the official event website, as the location may vary by year. Once you share the client website or the official event link, I can confirm venue details and geography with greater precision.
Attendee geographic origin: This event generally attracts a global audience rather than a local-only audience. The design automation and semiconductor industry is international by nature, so attendees typically come from North America, Europe, India, East Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East. Companies involved in chip design, electronics manufacturing, telecom infrastructure, cloud engineering, and software tooling tend to send teams from multiple regions.
Best geographic targeting approach:
- Global accounts with engineering centers in the U.S., Europe, India, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and Singapore
- Regional semiconductor clusters and design hubs
- Local host-city engineering firms and universities if the venue is in North America or Europe
- Multinational EDA software vendors and semiconductor suppliers
- Engineering services and offshore design firms supporting global clients
Because the sector is global, attendee databases from this event are usually valuable for international sales and account-based marketing campaigns.
3️⃣ Audience reach: local / national / global
Reach type: Global with strong national concentration depending on venue
This is not a local event in practical business terms. Even when hosted in one country, the audience is usually international because the semiconductor and electronic design automation ecosystem operates across borders. The conference may have a regional physical footprint, but its commercial relevance extends far beyond the host city or country.
For buyer-list strategy, this means the event is especially suitable for vendors that can sell into multiple geographies. It is ideal for SaaS, enterprise software, design tools, cloud services, IP licensing, chip verification platforms, engineering consulting, and technical training providers.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a sample buyer table with 15–20 target accounts that are highly relevant to this event. These are buyer-style companies that are likely to attend, sponsor, exhibit, evaluate tools, or have decision-makers present at the conference.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synopsys | synopsys.com | VP of Engineering, Product Marketing Director, Business Development Director | Core design automation and semiconductor software buyer; highly relevant to engineering tools and ecosystem partnerships. |
| 2 | Cadence Design Systems | cadence.com | Engineering Director, Alliances Manager, Technical Marketing Director | Major player in design automation, verification, and chip development workflows. |
| 3 | Siemens EDA | siemens.com/eda | Portfolio Manager, Solutions Director, Field Marketing Director | Strong fit for design, simulation, verification, and manufacturing-related engineering tools. |
| 4 | Keysight Technologies | keysight.com | Product Line Manager, Semiconductor Marketing Manager, Technical Sales Director | Relevant to test, measurement, validation, and design verification audiences. |
| 5 | Arm | arm.com | Partner Manager, Ecosystem Director, Product Marketing Manager | Central to processor IP, ecosystem development, and embedded design workflows. |
| 6 | AMD | amd.com | Director of Engineering, SoC Manager, Technical Program Manager | Advanced chip design and verification requirements make this a strong buyer target. |
| 7 | NVIDIA | nvidia.com | Hardware Engineering Manager, Partner Ecosystem Lead, Technical Alliances Director | High-end design, AI hardware, and compute-intensive engineering make this highly relevant. |
| 8 | Intel | intel.com | EDA Program Manager, Chip Design Director, Engineering Procurement Manager | Large-scale semiconductor design organization with broad tool and service needs. |
| 9 | Qualcomm | qualcomm.com | Design Verification Manager, ASIC Program Manager, Engineering Director | Mobile, wireless, and SoC design environment aligns strongly with conference content. |
| 10 | Broadcom | broadcom.com | Director of Hardware Engineering, Verification Lead, Product Engineering Manager | Deep semiconductor and networking chip portfolio creates good tool-buying relevance. |
| 11 | TSMC | tsmc.com | Technology Development Manager, Design Enablement Director, Technical Marketing Manager | Major foundry buyer with strong interest in design enablement and process ecosystem. |
| 12 | Samsung Semiconductor | samsung.com/semiconductor | Engineering Manager, Design Methodology Director, Strategic Partnerships Lead | Large-scale semiconductor organization with international engineering operations. |
| 13 | Micron Technology | micron.com | Memory Design Manager, Product Engineering Director, Technical Account Manager | Strong buyer profile for design, verification, and validation tools. |
| 14 | Texas Instruments | ti.com | Engineering Manager, Product Line Director, Design Automation Lead | Broad semiconductor portfolio and large engineering workforce make it a prime target. |
| 15 | Marvell Technology | marvell.com | ASIC Design Manager, Systems Engineering Director, Partner Manager | Networking and infrastructure chips need sophisticated design and validation solutions. |
| 16 | Rambus | rambus.com | IP Licensing Director, Engineering Manager, Product Marketing Manager | Strong fit for design IP, memory interface, and semiconductor ecosystem buyers. |
| 17 | Ansys | ansys.com | Product Marketing Director, Simulation Solutions Manager, Alliance Manager | Simulation and engineering design tools align closely with the conference’s technical audience. |
| 18 | MathWorks | mathworks.com | Industry Marketing Manager, Technical Sales Director, Strategic Partnerships Manager | Widely used by engineering and academic users in design, modeling, and algorithm development. |
| 19 | google.com | Hardware Engineering Manager, AI Infrastructure Lead, Technical Partnerships Manager | Custom hardware, AI infrastructure, and engineering tooling make this a relevant enterprise buyer. | |
| 20 | Amazon | amazon.com | Hardware Engineering Manager, Technical Program Manager, Procurement Manager | Large-scale engineering, cloud hardware, and infrastructure design create strong fit. |
Top 5 best sample accounts to send first: Synopsys, Cadence Design Systems, Siemens EDA, Keysight Technologies, and Arm. These five are highly strategic because they sit directly within the ecosystem and are most likely to value attendee data, sponsorship exposure, technical visibility, and business development opportunities.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
This event attracts a highly technical audience. The best job titles are those tied to engineering leadership, design tool ownership, verification, and strategic partnerships. Since the event is specialized, title targeting matters more than broad department targeting.
Best job profiles to target:
- Vice President of Engineering
- Director of Engineering
- Design Automation Manager
- Semiconductor Engineering Manager
- ASIC / SoC / FPGA Design Lead
- Verification Manager
- Hardware Architecture Director
- EDA Tools Manager
- Product Engineering Director
- Technical Program Manager
- R&D Director
- Chief Technology Officer
- Product Marketing Director
- Strategic Partnerships Manager
- Technology Development Director
- University Research Professor
- Graduate Research Lead
Best industry filters to use:
- Computer Software
- Computer Hardware
- Semiconductors
- Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Networking
- Industrial Automation
- Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
- Telecommunications
- Aviation & Aerospace
- Automotive
- Defense & Space
- Research
- Higher Education
- Management Consulting
- Market Research
For event type, this conference is best described as a technical B2B conference, trade show, and knowledge-exchange platform for the semiconductor and engineering design ecosystem. It may also include workshops, technical sessions, panel discussions, vendor demos, networking meetings, and academic presentations.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected footfall
Estimated attendance: This type of conference usually attracts a high-quality but smaller-to-mid-sized audience compared with mass consumer shows. A realistic estimate may range from 1,500 to 5,000+ attendees depending on the year, host location, and conference scale. If the event is co-located with a major expo or technical summit, footfall may be higher.
For attendee-list value, the actual number is less important than the concentration of decision-makers. Even a few thousand attendees can produce excellent lead quality if the audience includes engineering executives, technical managers, procurement influencers, and solution buyers.
If the official 2026 conference page provides exact registration or historical attendance figures, those should be used in the final version. For now, the event should be treated as a specialized high-value niche conference rather than a mass attendance show.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Main focus areas likely include:
- Electronic design automation tools and workflows
- Chip design productivity and engineering automation
- Verification, validation, and testing
- AI and machine learning for design optimization
- Semiconductor architecture and next-generation chip development
- Embedded systems and hardware-software co-design
- Cloud-based design infrastructure and compute acceleration
- IP reuse, silicon enablement, and design methodology
- Academic research and talent development
- Engineering collaboration between vendors, universities, and end users
Buyer engagement strategy: The best way to approach this event is to identify companies and titles that are actively investing in design acceleration, engineering scale, and product development efficiency. The strongest offers are usually not generic. They are highly relevant use cases such as simulation performance improvement, verification automation, design collaboration, engineering productivity, cloud-based compute, and advanced workflow tooling.
If your client sells software or services, the most effective message is not “We can help any attendee.” It is more specific, such as:
“We can help you reach semiconductor engineering leaders, design automation managers, verification teams, chip architects, and technical decision-makers involved in high-value design workflows.”
That approach is much more credible because this audience cares about technical precision, measurable gains, and enterprise-grade relevance.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
Before finalizing the best buyer list, please share your client’s website. Once I review the website, I can determine whether the ideal target accounts are:
- EDA software and engineering tool vendors
- Semiconductor manufacturers and chip designers
- Cloud, AI, or compute infrastructure providers
- Consulting or engineering services firms
- Recruitment and staffing companies focused on engineering talent
- Training, certification, or education providers
- Data, analytics, or market intelligence companies
The buyer list changes significantly based on what your client sells. For example, if the client sells software, target engineering leaders and product teams. If the client sells recruiting services, target talent acquisition and HR leaders. If the client sells technical content or education, target universities, training programs, and research institutions. If the client sells sponsorship or exhibit solutions, then vendors in the semiconductor and engineering ecosystem become the priority.
9️⃣ Industry suggestions based on industry classification list
The following industry categories are the strongest matches for this event and should be used when building segments or filtering companies:
- Computer Software
- Computer Hardware
- Semiconductors
- Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Networking
- Industrial Automation
- Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
- Telecommunications
- Research
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- Defense & Space
- Aviation & Aerospace
- Automotive
- Management Consulting
- Market Research
Additional account-building should also use company keywords such as chip design, EDA, verification, ASIC, SoC, embedded systems, silicon, hardware engineering, semiconductor IP, simulation, and electronic manufacturing.
Final recommendation
Design Automation Conference 2026 is a strong event for attendee-list sales because it is niche, technical, and decision-maker-heavy. It should be positioned as a premium engineering and semiconductor buyer environment rather than as a broad general-interest event.
Best buyer segments to collect:
- Engineering executives and technical managers
- Semiconductor and chip design leaders
- EDA software buyers and product teams
- Verification and validation decision-makers
- Academic researchers and university engineering departments
- Cloud, AI, and technical infrastructure providers
- Engineering services and consulting firms
Overall quality rating for B2B attendee-list sales: 9/10
This is a very strong event for highly targeted B2B outreach because the audience is specialized, global, and commercially relevant. The only missing piece is your client website, which will allow me to turn this broad analysis into a sharply tailored buyer shortlist.
Next step: Send your client website, and I will review it and give you the best buyer accounts, titles, and industry targeting specifically matched to your client’s product.
Data sheet
| Event Name | Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2026 |
| Event Date | July 26–29, 2026 |
| Event Status | Upcoming |
| Venue | Long Beach Convention Center |
| City | Long Beach |
| State / Region | California |
| Country | United States |
| Organizer | Design Automation Conference (DAC), supported by the DAC organizing body and industry/academic partners. Organizer identity should be confirmed from the official 2026 event pages. |
| Official Event Website | www.dac.com |
| Event Type | B2B conference and exhibition focused on electronic design automation, semiconductors, silicon design, verification, embedded systems, and engineering software/tooling. |
| Primary Category | IT & Technology |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Electric & Electronics; Industrial Engineering |
| Audience Reach | Global, with strong North America and Asia semiconductor ecosystem relevance. |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Current-year attendance data not publicly confirmed. Buyer and attendee profile assessment is based on official event positioning, program themes, and historical DAC market role. |
| Main Purpose of Event | To connect semiconductor, EDA, IP, systems, and engineering-tool stakeholders around design innovation, product development workflows, verification, AI-enabled engineering, and supplier-partner engagement. |
Design Automation Conference 2026 is a specialized B2B industry event centered on semiconductor design, electronic design automation, verification, embedded systems, hardware/software co-design, silicon engineering workflows, and adjacent AI-enabled engineering tools. DAC is widely regarded as a high-value meeting point for chip designers, EDA software providers, semiconductor manufacturers, system companies, research institutions, and engineering leaders evaluating next-generation design methodologies.
For lead generation and attendee targeting, DAC matters because it attracts concentrated technical and commercial influence rather than broad consumer traffic. Relevant participants typically include engineering executives, design and verification leaders, procurement-influencing technical teams, product and platform architects, R&D organizations, semiconductor ecosystem partners, and business development teams seeking technology partnerships, tool evaluations, IP sourcing, compute infrastructure, and design-flow optimization.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semiconductor design engineering leaders | Fabless chip companies, IDM design groups, SoC teams | Evaluate EDA platforms, verification tools, IP, compute environments, and design methodologies | High-value technical buyers and strong internal influencers |
| Verification and validation teams | ASIC/FPGA verification groups, emulation teams, test engineering organizations | Drive tool selection for simulation, formal verification, debugging, regression, and hardware-assisted validation | Critical for software, infrastructure, cloud compute, and services suppliers |
| EDA and engineering software product teams | EDA vendors, CAD/CAE providers, engineering workflow platforms | Buy complementary technology, data, partnerships, integrations, and event media/sponsorship | Relevant for channel partnerships, APIs, alliance sales, and ecosystem growth |
| R&D executives and CTO office stakeholders | Semiconductor firms, systems companies, advanced electronics manufacturers | Set technology roadmaps and approve strategic platforms | Important for long-cycle enterprise and innovation-led sales |
| Embedded systems and hardware/software architects | Automotive, aerospace, industrial, consumer electronics, edge-AI product companies | Influence architecture, toolchain, prototyping, and platform sourcing decisions | Relevant to software vendors, IP providers, and design-services firms |
| Foundry, manufacturing, and process-enablement teams | Foundries, manufacturing ecosystem partners, semiconductor process organizations | Influence process design kits, signoff compatibility, manufacturing readiness, and ecosystem alignment | High relevance for design-flow and manufacturing handoff suppliers |
| Procurement and strategic sourcing teams | Large semiconductor firms, enterprise engineering groups, public research labs | Commercial review of software, infrastructure, consulting, and licensing contracts | Useful for pricing, renewal, and vendor consolidation conversations |
| Cloud, HPC, and infrastructure decision-makers | Engineering IT, infrastructure groups, EDA cloud deployment teams | Buy compute capacity, storage, workflow automation, security, and orchestration tools | Strong fit for cloud, data center, cybersecurity, and DevOps suppliers |
| Academic researchers and university labs | Universities, funded chip research centers, public-private labs | Influence emerging standards, methods, tool adoption, and talent pipelines | Relevant for research software, grants collaboration, and technical credibility |
| Business development and strategic partnership teams | EDA vendors, semiconductor companies, IP vendors, services providers | Source alliances, channel relationships, OEM opportunities, and ecosystem deals | Very relevant for sponsorship, data partnerships, and enterprise introductions |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Beach | Event venue city; local support ecosystem and nearby engineering attendees | Medium | Convenient for Southern California aerospace, electronics, and design engineering communities. |
| California | Strong in-state attendance from semiconductor, EDA, cloud, and systems companies | High | Includes Southern California and major Northern California design and software hubs. |
| U.S. West Coast | Attendees from California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, and nearby technology corridors | High | Relevant for chip design, hardware, AI, electronic systems, and EDA vendor outreach. |
| National U.S. | Broad national draw from semiconductor, defense electronics, embedded systems, and enterprise R&D teams | Very High | DAC is a recognized U.S. industry meeting for advanced design automation and chip engineering. |
| Asia semiconductor hubs | Likely participants from Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, India, and other chip-design regions | High | Important due to fabless design, foundry, IP, packaging, and electronics manufacturing linkages. |
| Europe and Israel | Likely attendance from semiconductor design, EDA, automotive electronics, and research communities | Medium to High | Relevant for cross-border partnerships, embedded systems, automotive chips, and verification tooling. |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Primary classification | DAC operates in a globally interconnected semiconductor and engineering software market, attracting multinational vendors, design organizations, foundry-related stakeholders, and research participants. |
| National | Strong secondary reach | The event is also a major U.S. industry convening point for enterprise engineering buyers and technical decision-makers. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel | Semiconductor / design organization | Major buyer and influencer for EDA tools, verification, compute infrastructure, and silicon design workflows. | intel.com | VP Engineering, Design Director, CAD Manager, Verification Director, Procurement Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| AMD | Semiconductor / chip design company | Relevant for AI, CPU/GPU, verification, and advanced SoC design stack purchasing. | amd.com | Engineering Director, Silicon Program Manager, Verification Manager, EDA Infrastructure Lead | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| NVIDIA | Semiconductor / platform company | Heavy design and verification requirements; significant need for compute, simulation, and design automation. | nvidia.com | ASIC Director, Design Methodology Lead, CAD Director, Technical Program Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Qualcomm | Fabless semiconductor company | Key buyer for mobile, wireless, embedded, and AI-related chip design solutions. | qualcomm.com | Senior Director Engineering, SoC Architect, Verification Lead, Strategic Sourcing Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Arm | IP and semiconductor ecosystem company | Relevant buyer for EDA partnerships, co-marketing, verification tooling, and integration ecosystems. | arm.com | Partner Director, Product Manager, Design Enablement Lead, Business Development Director | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| TSMC | Foundry / ecosystem organization | Critical for process enablement, design ecosystem alignment, and manufacturing handoff technologies. | tsmc.com | Design Enablement Director, Ecosystem Manager, Foundry Alliance Manager, Technical Marketing Director | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Samsung Semiconductor | Semiconductor / foundry / systems organization | Potential buyer for advanced design tools, AI engineering workflows, IP, and process-aligned ecosystems. | semiconductor.samsung.com | Engineering Director, Foundry Ecosystem Manager, CAD Lead, Partnership Director | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| GlobalFoundries | Foundry / manufacturing ecosystem organization | Relevant to process, IP, verification, and customer enablement tooling. | gf.com | Design Enablement Director, Product Engineering Lead, Alliance Manager, Sourcing Lead | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| MediaTek | Fabless semiconductor company | Relevant buyer for embedded, mobile, connectivity, and SoC design technologies. | mediatek.com | Design Director, Verification Manager, CAD Manager, Procurement Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| NXP Semiconductors | Semiconductor company | Relevant for automotive, industrial, and embedded semiconductor design workflows. | nxp.com | Engineering Director, Embedded Systems Manager, Program Manager, Category Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Renesas Electronics | Semiconductor company | Buys design software, IP, embedded tools, and engineering services tied to product development. | renesas.com | Director Engineering, Product Development Manager, Verification Lead, Sourcing Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Texas Instruments | IDM / semiconductor manufacturer | Strong relevance for analog, embedded, process, and design-flow tool sourcing. | ti.com | CAD Manager, Engineering Director, Process Integration Lead, Procurement Manager | Prior-Year Participation Evidence |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VP Engineering | Engineering / R&D | VP | Owns technical direction, platform budgets, and strategic tool decisions. |
| 2 | Director of Engineering | Engineering | Director | Controls design teams and frequently influences vendor evaluations. |
| 3 | CAD Manager / Design Methodology Manager | Engineering Infrastructure | Manager / Director | Directly relevant to EDA, automation, workflow, and tooling procurement. |
| 4 | Verification Director / Manager | Verification / Validation | Manager / Director | Key buyer for simulation, formal, emulation, test, and debug tools. |
| 5 | ASIC / SoC Architect | Architecture | Senior IC / Director | Shapes requirements for tools, IP, and technical partnerships. |
| 6 | CTO / Chief Architect | Executive / Technology | C-Level | Relevant for innovation, roadmap alignment, and strategic supplier relationships. |
| 7 | Technical Program Manager | Program Management | Manager | Coordinates implementation, rollouts, and cross-functional vendor adoption. |
| 8 | Strategic Sourcing Manager | Procurement | Manager | Important for software licensing, infrastructure, and services negotiations. |
| 9 | Business Development Director | Partnerships / Corporate Development | Director | Relevant for alliances, integrations, event partnerships, and ecosystem expansion. |
| 10 | Engineering IT / Infrastructure Director | IT / Infrastructure | Director | Buys HPC, cloud, storage, security, and workflow orchestration tools used by engineering teams. |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Semiconductors | Core DAC audience sector | Chip design, verification, IP, process enablement, EDA adoption |
| 2 | Computer Software | EDA, simulation, design workflow, and AI tool vendors align here | Software sales, integration partnerships, cloud tooling |
| 3 | Information Technology & Services | Supports engineering platforms, infrastructure, and services ecosystems | Managed services, implementation, workflow support |
| 4 | Computer Hardware | Relevant to compute, prototyping, and hardware-assisted validation | Servers, accelerators, design appliances, prototyping systems |
| 5 | Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing | Broad electronics product firms may buy design tools and embedded solutions | Product engineering, hardware development, electronics manufacturing |
| 6 | Industrial Automation | Industrial electronics and embedded-control providers participate in advanced design workflows | Embedded systems, controls, edge design |
| 7 | Automotive | Automotive silicon and embedded systems are major design consumers | ADAS, EV electronics, safety verification, embedded compute |
| 8 | Aviation & Aerospace | High-reliability electronics and embedded systems buyers may attend | Mission-critical hardware/software design and validation |
| 9 | Defense & Space | Relevant for secure electronics, embedded compute, and high-reliability design flows | Trusted toolchains, verification, secure design services |
| 10 | Telecommunications | Wireless and communications chip design organizations align strongly with DAC themes | 5G/6G silicon, networking hardware, RF design support |
| 11 | Research | Academic and public-private research labs are important to DAC’s ecosystem | Pilot projects, algorithm development, grants collaboration |
| 12 | Computer Networking | Networking silicon and infrastructure vendors are relevant buyers | Switching, data center, interconnect, network processor design |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. | Not Confirmed | Official attendance figure not identified in publicly available 2026 event references reviewed. | Do not use a speculative attendee total for list-sales claims. |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Not Confirmed | Official 2026 exhibitor list/count not publicly confirmed at time of research | Check official exhibitor/sponsor pages closer to event. |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Not Confirmed | No official buyer-only count found in reviewed public references | Event is engineering-led; buyer influence often sits with technical leaders rather than pure procurement attendees. |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Not Confirmed | Official full 2026 agenda/speaker count not publicly confirmed in the event references used | Speaker organizations are typically useful for high-value target account selection. |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Not Confirmed | Sponsor roster for 2026 not publicly confirmed in sources reviewed | Sponsors can be strong commercial outreach targets once official list is released. |
| Historical attendance | Historical public evidence should be checked on official prior-year DAC pages before quoting numbers externally. | Historical / prior-year evidence | DAC has long-standing industry significance, but this report does not assign an unsupported numeric estimate. | Recommended approach: use participant quality over unverified volume. |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDA software | Tool performance, interoperability, cost control, and productivity | Technical demos, bakeoff discussions, pilot programs | Design, synthesis, place-and-route, signoff, and workflow automation solutions |
| Verification and validation | Coverage closure, debug efficiency, hardware/software validation speed | Target verification managers and lab leads | Simulation, emulation, formal, test automation, debug analytics |
| AI for engineering | Productivity gains, optimization, faster design iterations, insight extraction | Executive and innovation-led conversations | AI copilots, optimization engines, analytics, intelligent design assistants |
| Embedded systems | Hardware/software integration, prototyping, validation, time-to-market | Reach architects, system leads, and embedded engineering managers | Embedded toolchains, RTOS support, prototyping platforms, design services |
| Cloud and HPC for design workloads | Elastic compute, faster runs, secure collaboration, lower infrastructure friction | Target engineering IT and infrastructure leaders | Cloud platforms, schedulers, storage, security, orchestration, managed HPC |
| Semiconductor IP and ecosystem enablement | Reusable blocks, compatibility, faster tape-out, partner qualification | Alliance and ecosystem meetings | IP blocks, interface solutions, foundry alliances, technical partner programs |
| Security and trusted design | Protection of IP, secure development flows, compliance, risk reduction | Appeals to defense, telecom, and critical-systems buyers | Design security tools, code analysis, supply-chain integrity, secure workflow controls |
| Engineering services and consulting | Skills augmentation, design acceleration, implementation support | Useful where teams need specialist expertise or temporary capacity | Design services, verification consulting, methodology consulting, staffing support |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | Very High | DAC is highly specialized and aligned to real enterprise engineering buyers and technical influencers. |
| Decision-maker availability | High | Many decisions are shaped by engineering directors, methodology leaders, and CTO-level stakeholders rather than only centralized procurement. |
| Data collection potential | Medium to High | Good potential if official sponsor, speaker, exhibitor, and session-participant data are captured. Public attendee lists may be limited. |
| Apollo targeting potential | Very High | Industry and title filters are highly targetable across semiconductor, software, hardware, and engineering infrastructure accounts. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | California, broader U.S., Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, India, and Europe all represent strong pools. |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use account-based outreach centered on technical value, workflow improvement, and measurable engineering outcomes. |
| Overall lead quality | Very High | Strong event for high-value B2B attendee list building when the offer fits semiconductor and engineering buyers. |
| Best use case | High | Ideal for attendee-list targeting, ABM, speaker/account mapping, sponsor outreach, and ecosystem partnership prospecting. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Public attendee counts and current-year participation rosters may be limited; technical audiences require precise messaging. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Semiconductors; Computer Software; Information Technology & Services; Computer Hardware; Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing; Industrial Automation; Automotive; Telecommunications; Aviation & Aerospace; Defense & Space; Research; Computer Networking | Capture core DAC buyers and adjacent engineering-led accounts. |
| Departments | Engineering; Research; Information Technology; Operations; Procurement; Product Management; Business Development | Focus on technical buyers, infrastructure owners, and partnership leads. |
| Seniority | C-Level; VP; Director; Head; Manager; Senior | Aligns with budget owners and practical implementation influencers. |
| Job titles | VP Engineering, Director of Engineering, CAD Manager, Design Methodology Manager, Verification Director, Verification Manager, SoC Architect, ASIC Architect, CTO, Chief Architect, Technical Program Manager, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Engineering IT Director, Partnership Director | Supports both buyer identification and event-related ABM outreach. |
| Geography | United States; California; Texas; Oregon; Washington; Arizona; Massachusetts; Taiwan; South Korea; Japan; India; Germany; United Kingdom; Israel; Netherlands; France | Targets the strongest chip design and engineering software corridors. |
| Employee size | 201–500; 501–1,000; 1,001–5,000; 5,001–10,000; 10,001+ | Best fit for organizations with complex design or infrastructure purchasing needs. |
| Keywords | EDA, electronic design automation, chip design, semiconductor, ASIC, SoC, verification, formal verification, simulation, emulation, embedded systems, design methodology, tape-out, silicon, design flow, RTL, FPGA, HPC, design infrastructure, AI for engineering | Improves title and company relevance where industry tags are broad. |
| Technologies, if relevant | Cloud infrastructure, HPC, simulation, AI/ML, DevOps for engineering, cybersecurity | Useful when the client sells complementary infrastructure or software. |
| Revenue range, if relevant | $50M+ preferred; enterprise focus at $500M+ | Helps prioritize accounts with meaningful budgets and large design organizations. |
| Company type | Public companies, private growth companies, multinational enterprises, research institutions | Covers both large enterprise buyers and innovation-led specialist firms. |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Automation Conference official website | Official event website | Event identity, official branding, and conference positioning | High |
| Long Beach Convention & Entertainment Center | Official venue website | Venue name and location reference | High |
| ACM SIGDA DAC information page | Association / industry source | DAC market role and academic/industry relevance | High |
| IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation | Association source | Industry context and DAC-adjacent ecosystem relevance | Medium to High |
| Official DAC agenda, exhibitor, sponsor, and speaker pages for 2026 | Primary event sources | Recommended next-step verification for current-year participant confirmation | High when published |
| Public company websites listed in the buyer company table | Corporate websites | Company identity and market fit to DAC buying roles | High for company validation; not proof of 2026 attendance |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to Design Automation Conference (DAC) 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.