
AAPM 68th Annual Meeting & Exhibition 2026
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to AAPM 68th Annual Meeting & Exhibition 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
American Association of Physicists in Medicine Meeting & Exhibition 2026
Event type: Medical physics, radiation oncology, diagnostic imaging, clinical technology, scientific conference, exhibition
Estimated attendance: Typically a large professional gathering with a highly specialized audience of medical physicists, radiation oncology teams, hospital technology leaders, researchers, vendors, and academic professionals. For 2026, a reasonable planning estimate is 3,000–5,000+ attendees, with exhibition traffic concentrated among decision-makers and technical evaluators.
Audience profile: Highly specialized, technical, and purchase-influencing audience focused on healthcare technology, equipment, software, clinical workflow, dosimetry, imaging, quality assurance, and research.
1️⃣ Who attends: Buyers / attendees
This event is not a general healthcare show. It is a niche, high-value professional meeting for people who influence or approve technology, equipment, software, service, and research purchases in radiation oncology, medical imaging, and clinical physics environments. The attendee base is usually made up of technical experts and clinical leaders, which makes it especially valuable for vendors selling to hospitals, cancer centers, imaging facilities, universities, and research institutions.
Main attendee groups:
- Medical physicists and senior physicists
- Radiation oncology department leaders
- Dosimetrists and treatment planning specialists
- Radiation therapists and clinical technologists
- Hospital imaging directors and radiology administrators
- Research scientists and academic faculty
- QA / regulatory / compliance professionals
- Vendors, application specialists, product managers, and service teams
- Procurement influencers for medical devices, software, and clinical systems
The strongest buyer layer is usually not “buyers” in the traditional consumer sense, but clinical decision-makers and technical evaluators who shape purchasing decisions for radiation therapy systems, imaging tools, treatment planning software, QA devices, dosimetry products, and lab/research solutions.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
Show location: The event is hosted in a major U.S. conference destination in 2026. The exact city and venue should be confirmed from the official event source before final list-building, because venue and city details can affect geographic targeting, travel behavior, and local buyer concentration.
Attendee origin: The audience is primarily U.S.-based, but this meeting has a meaningful international research and vendor presence. Attendees commonly come from hospitals, cancer centers, universities, national labs, research institutes, and equipment manufacturers across North America, Europe, Asia, and other global healthcare markets.
Best geographic targeting:
- National U.S. audience first
- Strong regional participation from the host city and surrounding states
- Global reach among researchers, vendors, and academic collaborators
- International companies with U.S. clinical sales and applications teams
3️⃣ Audience reach
Reach type: National with global technical influence
This is a specialized professional event with a strong national footprint in the United States and meaningful global relevance in medical physics and radiation oncology. It is not a mass-market event, but it has exceptionally high value per attendee because the audience is technically sophisticated and deeply involved in purchasing, specifying, evaluating, or recommending products and services.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below are sample buyer accounts that are strong fits for attendee-list targeting. These are the types of companies and organizations most likely to have a real reason to attend, exhibit, sponsor, or send technical and clinical teams.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Varian, a Siemens Healthineers company | varian.com | Product Manager, Radiation Oncology / Clinical Applications Manager | Core radiation oncology technology company; highly aligned with medical physics, treatment planning, and clinical workflow. |
| 2 | Elekta | elekta.com | Senior Product Manager / Clinical Science Manager | Major radiation therapy vendor with a strong fit for clinical decision-makers and application specialists. |
| 3 | GE HealthCare | gehealthcare.com | Imaging Product Manager / Strategic Accounts Director | Strong fit for diagnostic imaging, radiology workflows, and hospital technology buying committees. |
| 4 | Philips | philips.com | Clinical Solution Manager / Hospital Sales Director | Relevant for imaging systems, workflow software, and hospital-based technology adoption. |
| 5 | Canon Medical Systems | us.medical.canon | Imaging Sales Manager / Clinical Applications Specialist | Good fit for diagnostic imaging and radiology decision-makers. |
| 6 | Accuray | accuray.com | Director of Clinical Applications / Oncology Product Manager | Directly connected to precision radiation delivery and oncology workflow. |
| 7 | IBA | iba-worldwide.com | Proton Therapy Product Manager / Clinical Support Manager | Highly relevant for advanced therapy systems and specialized treatment centers. |
| 8 | Brainlab | brainlab.com | Medical Affairs Manager / Oncology Solutions Consultant | Strong fit for treatment planning, imaging guidance, and digital clinical workflows. |
| 9 | Mevion Medical Systems | mevion.com | Vice President, Clinical Operations / Regional Sales Director | Focused on proton therapy and advanced cancer treatment technology. |
| 10 | Sun Nuclear | sunnuclear.com | QA Product Manager / Radiation Physics Sales Manager | Excellent match for QA, dosimetry, and medical physics tooling. |
| 11 | Mirion Technologies | mirion.com | Business Development Manager / Clinical Physics Product Manager | Strong fit for dosimetry, radiation detection, and safety applications. |
| 12 | PTW | ptw.de | Sales Director, Medical Physics / Product Specialist | Well-aligned with dosimetry and QA solutions for medical physics teams. |
| 13 | RaySearch Laboratories | raysearchlabs.com | Clinical Product Manager / Oncology Software Director | Strong fit for treatment planning and oncology software buyers. |
| 14 | Royal Philips Imaging | philips.com | Hospital Imaging Accounts Manager | Useful for radiology and hospital procurement contacts. |
| 15 | Siemens Healthineers | siemens-healthineers.com | Clinical Product Manager / Sales Operations Manager | Major healthcare technology company with strong relevance across imaging and therapy workflows. |
Top 5 best sample targets to present first: Varian, Elekta, GE HealthCare, Philips, Sun Nuclear. These names give you a solid mix of radiation oncology, imaging, and QA-focused buying potential.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target:
- Medical Physicist
- Senior Medical Physicist
- Director of Medical Physics
- Chief of Physics
- Radiation Oncology Director
- Radiology / Imaging Director
- Clinical Applications Specialist
- Product Manager, Medical Devices
- QA Manager / Quality Assurance Lead
- Dosimetry Manager
- Treatment Planning Specialist
- Research Scientist / Principal Investigator
- Hospital Procurement / Strategic Sourcing
- Technology Assessment Manager
- Business Development Manager, Healthcare
Best industry filters to use:
- Hospital & Health Care
- Medical Devices
- Biotechnology
- Research
- Higher Education
- Pharmaceuticals
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Software
- Health, Wellness & Fitness
- Government Administration
- Management Consulting
- Professional Training & Coaching
Event type fit: This is a premium B2B scientific conference and exhibition. It is ideal for vendors in medical technology, diagnostic systems, oncology products, software, measurement tools, QA solutions, and academic research support.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected footfall
Estimated total attendance: 3,000–5,000+ professional attendees
Footfall is smaller than a giant consumer expo, but the buyer quality is very high. This kind of conference typically produces dense booth traffic from technical experts, hospital leaders, researchers, and vendor teams with real budget influence. The exhibition area may not be as large as mainstream healthcare conferences, but the audience is much more specialized.
The best lead value comes from filtering out students and academic observers when necessary and focusing on people who can influence product trials, equipment evaluation, purchasing committees, and multi-site technology rollouts.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Main focus areas:
- Medical physics and clinical applications
- Radiation oncology technology
- Treatment planning and workflow optimization
- Diagnostic imaging and radiology
- Dosimetry and radiation measurement
- Quality assurance and safety compliance
- Proton therapy and advanced cancer care
- Software, AI, automation, and imaging analytics
- Research, education, and training
- Clinical equipment service and support
Buyer engagement angle: The strongest messaging is highly technical and outcomes-focused. Instead of a broad “attendee list,” the value proposition should be framed around reaching:
- Medical physicists involved in system evaluation
- Radiation oncology teams shaping purchase decisions
- Hospital and clinic leaders responsible for technology adoption
- Academic researchers influencing future clinical standards
- Vendors and distributors looking for partnerships and channel growth
For many vendors, this audience is useful because it combines technical expertise with long-term buying influence. Even when attendees are not final approvers, they often strongly affect vendor selection, clinical validation, and product acceptance.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
Before finalizing the best buyer list, I should review your client’s website and product positioning. This event can be approached very differently depending on what your client sells.
Examples:
- If the client sells medical imaging equipment, target imaging directors, radiology leaders, and hospital technology teams.
- If the client sells radiation oncology software, target physicists, treatment planning teams, and clinical applications specialists.
- If the client sells QA / dosimetry products, target QA managers, medical physicists, and safety leads.
- If the client sells services or consulting, target clinical operations leaders, research heads, and hospital procurement teams.
- If the client sells education or training solutions, target academic faculty, residency program leaders, and professional development teams.
Best next step: Please share the client website, and I can narrow this into the best-fit buyer companies, best titles, and most relevant industry filters for your exact offer.
9️⃣ Recommended industry selection from the industry list
Based on this event, the most relevant industries to target are:
- Hospital & Health Care
- Medical Devices
- Research
- Higher Education
- Biotechnology
- Pharmaceuticals
- Computer Software
- Information Technology & Services
- Government Administration
- Professional Training & Coaching
If your client sells software, data tools, workflow automation, AI, analytics, or cloud products, then Computer Software and Information Technology & Services become especially important. If the offer is hardware, imaging systems, detectors, QA equipment, or service support, then Medical Devices, Hospital & Health Care, and Research should be prioritized.
Final recommendation
This event is a strong B2B lead source for companies selling into medical physics, radiation oncology, diagnostic imaging, QA, dosimetry, clinical software, and healthcare technology. It is not a broad buyer market, but it is a high-intent, high-specialization audience where even a modest number of contacts can be very valuable.
Quality rating for attendee-list sales: 9/10 for niche healthcare technology targeting
Why it scores highly: The audience is specialized, influential, technically informed, and closely connected to purchasing and evaluation workflows. The only limitation is that it is a narrow audience, so success depends on precise client-product matching.
If you share the client website, I can turn this into a sharper buyer list with the best companies, best job titles, best industries, and best geographic targeting for your exact campaign.
Data sheet
| Event Name | AAPM 68th Annual Meeting & Exhibition 2026 |
| Event Date | July 26–30, 2026 |
| Event Status | Upcoming |
| Venue | Gaylord Rockies Resort & Convention Center |
| City | Aurora |
| State / Region | Colorado |
| Country | United States |
| Organizer | American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) |
| Official Event Website | aapm.org |
| Event Type | Scientific conference and exhibition focused on medical physics, radiation oncology, diagnostic imaging, clinical technology, research, and professional education |
| Primary Category | Medical & Pharma |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Science & Research; IT & Technology |
| Audience Reach | National primary reach with international specialist participation likely |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Estimated 3,000–5,000+ attendees for planning purposes; organizer-public current-year figure not confirmed |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Estimated based on event scale and historical specialist-meeting positioning; attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer |
| Main Purpose of Event | To convene medical physicists, radiation oncology teams, imaging experts, clinical technology stakeholders, researchers, educators, and solution providers for scientific exchange, product evaluation, training, networking, and procurement-influencing discussions |
The AAPM Annual Meeting & Exhibition is one of the best-known professional gatherings in the medical physics field, bringing together clinical, academic, and industry stakeholders involved in radiation therapy, diagnostic imaging, dosimetry, treatment planning, quality assurance, software, and related healthcare technologies. The meeting combines scientific sessions, professional education, poster presentations, committee activities, and an exhibition environment where suppliers can engage highly technical users and evaluators.
From a business development perspective, this event matters because attendees commonly influence specification-setting, clinical workflow design, equipment evaluation, validation, implementation, and long-cycle capital or software purchasing decisions within hospitals, cancer centers, imaging networks, academic health systems, and research institutions. It is especially relevant for suppliers selling complex clinical technologies, QA tools, imaging systems, radiation oncology equipment, informatics, AI-enabled workflow tools, calibration services, and research-enabling solutions.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief / Senior Medical Physicists | Hospitals, academic medical centers, cancer centers, proton therapy programs | Technical decision-maker, evaluator, specification influencer | High-value audience for radiation therapy systems, QA platforms, dosimetry tools, software, and service contracts |
| Radiation Oncology Department Leaders | Hospital radiation oncology departments, oncology networks | Budget influence, operational approval, clinical workflow prioritization | Relevant for treatment delivery, planning, workflow, staffing efficiency, and compliance-oriented solutions |
| Dosimetrists and Treatment Planning Specialists | Cancer centers, radiation treatment facilities | Daily users, technical recommenders, workflow validators | Key audience for planning software, contouring tools, optimization, and QA solutions |
| Diagnostic Imaging Physicists | Hospital imaging departments, outpatient imaging networks, academic institutions | Evaluator and compliance stakeholder for imaging performance, dose management, and quality systems | Important for imaging QA, dose analytics, calibration, and software platforms |
| Hospital Technology and Clinical Engineering Leaders | Health systems, integrated delivery networks, specialty hospitals | Procurement support, implementation oversight, technology lifecycle management | Useful for enterprise deployment, maintenance, service contracts, interoperability, and upgrade planning |
| Research Scientists and Principal Investigators | Universities, cancer institutes, federal and nonprofit research organizations | Influence grant-funded purchases and pilot evaluations | Relevant for advanced imaging, software, experimental devices, analytics, and research platforms |
| Procurement and Supply Chain Teams | Hospital systems, university medical centers, public health institutions | Commercial review, contract processing, vendor onboarding | Critical for converting technical interest into purchasing pathways |
| Academic Program Leaders and Faculty | Medical physics programs, teaching hospitals, universities | Influence curriculum tools, lab equipment, and institutional technology preferences | Relevant for education technology, training platforms, simulation tools, and research-grade systems |
| Vendor-side Scientific and Business Development Teams | Medical device, software, imaging, radiation oncology, QA, and informatics companies | Partnership development, competitive intelligence, channel exploration | Enables co-selling, distribution, integrations, and OEM conversations |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora / Denver metro | Local and regional healthcare providers, universities, and technology stakeholders | Moderate | Host-market attendance likely benefits nearby hospitals, imaging centers, and Colorado-based academic institutions |
| Colorado and Mountain West | Regional hospital systems, cancer centers, university programs, and specialty clinics | Moderate to High | Accessible location for Western and Mountain states |
| United States national market | Medical physicists, oncology and imaging professionals, purchasing stakeholders from major health systems nationwide | High | Core event reach is national due to the association’s role in the U.S. medical physics community |
| International specialist market | Selected participants from global academic, clinical, and vendor organizations | Selective | Likely international participation, but public country breakdown not confirmed |
| Key buyer corridors | Major U.S. oncology, imaging, and academic research hubs | High | Especially relevant for organizations with radiation oncology, proton therapy, imaging physics, and university hospital programs |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| National | Primary classification | AAPM is a leading U.S. professional association in medical physics, making the annual meeting a national draw for clinical, academic, and supplier stakeholders |
| International | Secondary reach likely | Specialized scientific and vendor participation may include international delegates, but current-year international attendee mix is not publicly confirmed |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD Anderson Cancer Center | Academic cancer center | Major radiation oncology, imaging, and research buyer with advanced medical physics requirements | mdanderson.org | Chief Medical Physicist, Director of Medical Physics, Radiation Oncology Director, Clinical Engineering Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Mayo Clinic | Integrated health system / academic medicine | High-value buyer for imaging physics, radiation therapy technology, and research tools | mayoclinic.org | Medical Physics Chair, Imaging Physics Lead, Procurement Manager, Radiation Oncology Administrator | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | Cancer center | Relevant for treatment planning, QA, dosimetry, imaging, and research procurement | mskcc.org | Chief Physicist, Director Radiation Oncology Physics, Senior Dosimetrist Lead, Supply Chain Category Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Cleveland Clinic | Health system | Large buyer of oncology, imaging, analytics, and technical service solutions | clevelandclinic.org | Radiation Oncology Operations Director, Medical Physics Manager, Imaging Director, Procurement Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| UCLA Health | Academic health system | Relevant for advanced imaging, radiation oncology, and academic-clinical research collaborations | uclahealth.org | Clinical Professor Medical Physics, Radiation Oncology Administrator, Imaging Physics Lead, Strategic Sourcing Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Mass General Brigham | Integrated academic health system | Relevant for enterprise imaging and oncology technology evaluation across multiple facilities | massgeneralbrigham.org | Director of Medical Physics, VP Supply Chain, Imaging Service Director, Radiation Oncology Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Johns Hopkins Medicine | Academic medical center | Strong fit for imaging physics, radiation oncology, research software, and clinical innovation | hopkinsmedicine.org | Medical Physics Director, Research Program Director, Imaging Quality Lead, Category Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Academic medical center | Buyer of radiation oncology systems, imaging tools, research platforms, and clinical QA technologies | utsouthwestern.edu | Chief Physicist, Program Administrator, Strategic Sourcing, Clinical Engineering Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus | Academic health campus | Local-market relevance due to Colorado location and fit with medical physics education and clinical programs | cuanschutz.edu | Medical Physics Faculty, Radiation Oncology Physicist, Procurement Specialist, Research Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Kaiser Permanente | Integrated healthcare provider | Relevant enterprise buyer for imaging systems, oncology workflows, service support, and standardization programs | kp.org | Regional Imaging Director, Oncology Service Line Director, Strategic Sourcing Manager, Clinical Technology Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chief Medical Physicist | Medical Physics / Radiation Oncology | Director / Head | Top technical approver for equipment, software, QA protocols, and vendor evaluation |
| 2 | Director of Medical Physics | Medical Physics | Director | Owns service standards, technology implementation, and departmental purchasing influence |
| 3 | Radiation Oncology Director | Radiation Oncology | Director | Balances clinical operations, capital priorities, staffing, and vendor alignment |
| 4 | Diagnostic Imaging Physicist | Imaging / Radiology | Manager / Senior Specialist | Key evaluator for imaging quality, dose, compliance, and software analytics |
| 5 | Clinical Engineering Director | Clinical Engineering / Biomed | Director | Important for implementation, maintenance, asset lifecycle, and interoperability discussions |
| 6 | Procurement Manager | Supply Chain / Procurement | Manager | Converts technical demand into sourcing process, vendor approval, and contract execution |
| 7 | Strategic Sourcing Manager | Supply Chain | Manager | Relevant for enterprise agreements, category purchasing, and standardization |
| 8 | Research Program Director | Research / Academic Affairs | Director | Influences grant-backed purchases, pilots, and translational research tool selection |
| 9 | IT Director, Oncology Informatics | IT / Clinical Informatics | Director | Critical for integration, cybersecurity, data exchange, and software deployment |
| 10 | Business Development Director | Industry / Partnerships | Director | Useful for reseller, OEM, technology alliance, and channel partnership opportunities |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hospital & Health Care | Core buyer universe for clinical adoption and enterprise implementation | Hospitals, cancer centers, IDNs |
| 2 | Medical Devices | Strong fit for radiation therapy, imaging, and QA manufacturers | Partnership and channel targeting |
| 3 | Research | Academic and translational research groups are highly relevant | Lab tools, data platforms, pilot programs |
| 4 | Higher Education | Medical physics programs and teaching hospitals influence technology adoption | Education, simulation, and research sales |
| 5 | Biotechnology | Relevant where imaging and oncology innovation overlap with translational science | Research collaboration and software analytics |
| 6 | Information Technology & Services | Relevant for clinical workflow, cloud, cybersecurity, and integration solutions | Informatics and interoperability targeting |
| 7 | Computer Software | Treatment planning, analytics, QA, imaging, and AI tools are software-led categories | Clinical software vendors and buyer users |
| 8 | Computer & Network Security | Healthcare imaging and treatment systems require strong security and data governance | Secure deployment and risk management |
| 9 | Health, Wellness & Fitness | Secondary fit for patient care optimization and wellness-adjacent health systems | Selective health provider outreach |
| 10 | Government Administration | Relevant for VA, defense health, and public academic-health environments when applicable | Public-sector healthcare opportunities |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | 3,000–5,000+ | Estimated | Planning estimate based on event scale and specialist annual-meeting profile | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Public 2026 exhibitor directory not verified at research time | Likely material for supplier outreach once official floor plan or exhibitor listing is released |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Organizer does not publicly confirm a buyer-only count | Event is attendee-rich in influencers rather than a traditional hosted-buyer format |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Scientific program volume indicates a substantial speaker and presenter base | Would include invited speakers, session chairs, and abstract presenters |
| Historical attendance | Not publicly consolidated in current research set | Historical / prior-year evidence incomplete | Organizer pages confirm annual recurring event but not a single public 2026 attendance benchmark in reviewed material | Use current estimate cautiously for campaign planning only |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiation oncology technology | Improve treatment accuracy, throughput, and safety | Demo-driven technical conversations with physicists and department heads | Treatment systems, accessories, workflow software, positioning, verification tools |
| Dosimetry and QA | Maintain compliance, calibration quality, and operational reliability | Target technical evaluators and chief physicists | Dosimeters, phantoms, QA software, measurement tools, service programs |
| Diagnostic imaging | Optimize image quality, dose monitoring, and system performance | Engage imaging physicists and radiology operations leaders | Imaging QA, dose analytics, calibration, diagnostic software |
| Clinical software and informatics | Workflow visibility, data integration, plan review, reporting | Target physics leaders plus IT/informatics stakeholders | Planning software, analytics, PACS-adjacent tools, interoperability platforms |
| AI and automation | Reduce manual steps and improve consistency | High interest where measurable workflow or accuracy gains are demonstrated | Auto-contouring, plan optimization, predictive QA, image analysis |
| Research and academic collaboration | Access tools for innovation, grants, publications, and translational work | Connect with faculty, labs, and principal investigators | Research platforms, advanced analytics, data environments, prototype technologies |
| Service, support, and lifecycle management | Minimize downtime and ensure safe operation | Relevant to engineering, operations, and procurement teams | Maintenance, training, validation, managed services, upgrade support |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | Very High | Audience is highly specialized and closely aligned to clinical technology evaluation and adoption |
| Decision-maker availability | High | Many attendees are technical approvers and department influencers, though some purchases require committee approval |
| Data collection potential | Medium | High-value conversations likely, but public attendee transparency appears limited |
| Apollo targeting potential | High | Hospital, academic, research, and device/software segments can be targeted by industry, title, and geography |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | National U.S. targeting is appropriate, with optional prioritization by oncology and academic-health hubs |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use technical-value messaging, workflow improvement language, and evidence-based ROI rather than generic healthcare copy |
| Overall lead quality | Very High | Niche event, strong technical authority, concentrated healthcare technology relevance |
| Best use case | High | ABM outreach, exhibitor targeting, clinical technology prospecting, partnership mapping, and strategic list-building |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Public attendee confirmation is limited; sales cycles in healthcare can be long and committee-based |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Hospital & Health Care; Medical Devices; Research; Higher Education; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Biotechnology; Government Administration | Covers core clinical, academic, technical, and public-sector buyer environments |
| Departments | Operations; Information Technology; Engineering; Research; Purchasing; Healthcare Services | Targets both technical evaluators and commercial approvers |
| Seniority | Director; Head; VP; CXO; Manager; Partner where relevant | Focuses on authority-bearing and implementation-owning contacts |
| Job titles | Chief Medical Physicist; Director of Medical Physics; Radiation Oncology Director; Medical Physicist; Diagnostic Imaging Physicist; Clinical Engineering Director; Procurement Manager; Strategic Sourcing Manager; Oncology Informatics Director; Research Program Director | High-fit title stack for event-aligned prospecting |
| Geography | United States primary; Colorado and Mountain West for regional pre-event targeting; major oncology hubs nationally | Supports local, regional, and national prospect segmentation |
| Employee size | 201–500; 501–1,000; 1,001–5,000; 5,001–10,000; 10,001+ | Captures health systems, academic institutions, and enterprise care providers |
| Keywords | medical physics, radiation oncology, dosimetry, treatment planning, linear accelerator, proton therapy, imaging physics, quality assurance, oncology informatics, dose management | Improves precision for niche clinical and technical audiences |
| Technologies, if relevant | PACS, oncology information systems, treatment planning systems, healthcare analytics, DICOM-related infrastructure | Useful when selling integration, informatics, or cybersecurity solutions |
| Revenue range, if relevant | $50M+ for enterprise healthcare providers; no strict limit for academic buyers | Filters for organizations likely to support capital or multi-site purchases |
| Company type | Hospitals, academic medical centers, cancer centers, university health systems, research institutes, public healthcare providers | Narrows outreach to buyer-side entities |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) | Official organizer website | Organizer identity, association scope, annual meeting ownership | High |
| AAPM Meetings Pages | Official event/meeting pages | Annual meeting framework, event continuity, professional audience relevance | High |
| Gaylord Rockies Resort & Convention Center | Official venue website | Venue identity and location in Aurora, Colorado | High |
| User-supplied event details | Provided event brief | Event title, dates, city, state, country, venue, and baseline positioning | Medium to High |
| Public attendance disclosure review | Verification note | No current-year organizer-confirmed attendance figure, buyer count, or public attendee list verified in reviewed material | High for limitation statement |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to AAPM 68th Annual Meeting & Exhibition 2026 — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.