
QA or the Highway
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to QA or the Highway — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
QA or the Highway
Event type: Quality assurance, software testing, test automation, engineering excellence, DevOps, product delivery, and technology leadership conference.
Best-fit use case: This event is best viewed as a highly targeted B2B technology and software quality audience, with strong value for companies selling testing tools, automation platforms, development infrastructure, observability, QA services, training, outsourcing, security testing, and engineering productivity solutions.
1️⃣ Who attends: buyers / attendees
This is typically a professional conference for people involved in software quality, engineering, product delivery, and test automation. The strongest buyer profiles are not general consumers; they are technical decision-makers and operational leaders who influence software stack purchases, QA process improvements, team productivity, and vendor selection.
Main attendee groups:
- QA engineers, test automation engineers, and software test leads
- Engineering managers, director-level engineering leaders, and VPs of engineering
- DevOps, platform engineering, and release engineering teams
- Product managers and technical program managers involved in delivery quality
- Software architects and principal engineers
- CTOs, CIOs, and heads of engineering at mid-market and enterprise software companies
- Consulting firms, QA outsourcing providers, and managed testing services
- Tool vendors, open-source contributors, and technology solution partners
The best buyers are usually organizations with active software development, multiple release cycles, regulated environments, or high customer experience sensitivity. That includes fintech, SaaS, e-commerce, healthcare technology, telecom, media, logistics technology, enterprise software, and digital product companies.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
Show location: If you share the exact venue or city, this section can be made much more precise. For now, the event should be treated as a technology audience event with a likely strong regional draw and a broader national audience depending on the host city and speaker lineup.
Attendee origin: The audience is usually a mix of local professionals, national travelers, and remote participants if the event offers hybrid access. For a QA-focused event, the geographic origin often spans software hubs such as:
- Major metro tech centers in the same country as the event
- Nearby regional tech corridors and startup clusters
- Remote attendees from distributed engineering teams
- Some international attendees if the event has recognized speakers, tool vendors, or community influence
Best geographic targeting: target companies with engineering teams in major software markets, plus local firms within commuting distance of the venue. If the event is in a major city, the buyer list can be expanded to national enterprise accounts and regional technology companies.
3️⃣ Audience reach
Reach type: National with strong niche global relevance
This type of event usually starts as a specialist conference rather than a mass-market trade show. However, because software testing and QA are universal functions in technology organizations, the audience can still have broad reach across multiple industries and geographies. If the event features recognized speakers, modern testing stacks, or well-known sponsors, it can attract a global professional audience even when the physical attendance is mostly domestic.
Practical reading of reach:
- Local: Strong if the event is city-based and community-driven
- National: Very likely, especially for engineering and QA professionals
- Global: Moderate to strong if the conference is well-known in the testing community
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a sample buyer table with companies that are likely to value quality engineering, software delivery, automation, testing, observability, or digital product reliability. These are buyer-style targets, not just generic attendees.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft | microsoft.com | Director of Engineering Quality / Test Platform Lead | Large-scale software delivery organization with strong need for test automation, release quality, and developer productivity. |
| 2 | google.com | Engineering Productivity Manager / QA Tooling Lead | Highly complex product environment with heavy emphasis on automation, reliability, and engineering systems. | |
| 3 | Amazon | amazon.com | Software Development Manager / Quality Engineering Manager | Massive software ecosystem, frequent releases, and strong need for scalable testing and observability. |
| 4 | Salesforce | salesforce.com | VP of Quality Engineering / Test Automation Architect | Enterprise SaaS company with high standards for product reliability and customer experience. |
| 5 | Adobe | adobe.com | Director of QA Automation / Release Engineering Manager | Software-heavy product portfolio, frequent feature updates, and strong demand for test coverage. |
| 6 | Intuit | intuit.com | Engineering Manager, Quality Platforms | High-value digital products where quality, compliance, and user trust are essential. |
| 7 | ServiceNow | servicenow.com | Director of Test Engineering | Enterprise workflow software with strong dependency on stable release processes and automation. |
| 8 | Atlassian | atlassian.com | Head of Engineering Quality / Developer Experience Lead | Software collaboration tools audience aligns well with QA, agile delivery, and team productivity solutions. |
| 9 | Walmart Global Tech | walmart.com | Director of Software Quality / Retail Technology Manager | Large digital commerce environment where performance, stability, and automation matter at scale. |
| 10 | Capital One | capitalone.com | Technology Risk Manager / Software Quality Lead | Financial services organization with strong compliance, testing, and release governance needs. |
| 11 | Accenture | accenture.com | Quality Engineering Practice Lead | Large consulting and systems integration firm that regularly sells QA and testing services. |
| 12 | Cognizant | cognizant.com | Test Automation Practice Director | Strong buyer fit for enterprise testing, managed services, and digital transformation projects. |
| 13 | EPAM Systems | epam.com | Vice President, Quality Engineering | Engineering services company with a direct need for QA talent, tooling, and delivery excellence. |
| 14 | Infosys | infosys.com | QA Delivery Manager / Automation Center of Excellence Lead | Global services company with constant investment in testing frameworks and engineering efficiency. |
| 15 | Fidelity Investments | fidelity.com | Director of Test Engineering / Release Manager | Complex financial technology environment where reliability, security, and auditability are crucial. |
Top 5 best samples to send first: Microsoft, Amazon, Salesforce, Capital One, and Accenture. These cover software product companies, digital commerce, financial technology, and enterprise services, which are among the strongest potential buyers for a QA-focused event.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target:
- QA Engineer / Senior QA Engineer
- Automation Test Engineer
- Software Development Engineer in Test
- Test Lead / QA Lead
- Quality Engineering Manager
- Director of Engineering Quality
- Engineering Manager
- Director of Software Development
- VP Engineering
- CTO / CIO
- Release Manager
- DevOps Manager
- Platform Engineering Lead
- Technical Program Manager
- Product Engineering Leader
- Observability / Reliability Engineer
Best industry filters to use:
- Computer Software
- Information Technology & Services
- Internet
- Financial Services
- Banking
- Insurance
- Retail
- E-Learning
- Telecommunications
- Computer Hardware
- Computer Networking
- Semiconductors
- Management Consulting
- Staffing & Recruiting
- Market Research
- Media Production
- Health, Wellness & Fitness
- Hospital & Health Care
- Logistics & Supply Chain
Why these industries matter: QA and test automation are critical wherever software reliability affects revenue, compliance, customer trust, or operational uptime. The strongest prospects often come from companies with fast release cycles, regulated products, high transaction volume, or complex digital ecosystems.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected footfall
Estimated attendance: If the event is a mid-size specialist conference, a realistic range would be 300 to 1,500 attendees depending on city, speaker strength, and sponsor support. If it is a larger established conference series, attendance can move beyond that.
Interpretation for attendee-list sales: Footfall matters, but the real value is audience quality. A QA-focused event usually has a smaller crowd than a general technology expo, but the lead quality can be much stronger because attendees are already deep in the buying cycle for tools, services, and process improvements.
Typical mix you want to capture:
- Technical buyers and influencers
- Engineering managers and QA leads
- Consultants and service providers
- Vendor partners and sponsors
- Recruiters and talent acquisition teams hiring technical staff
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Key focus areas:
- Test automation frameworks and tools
- Continuous integration and continuous delivery
- Quality engineering best practices
- AI-assisted testing and test generation
- Performance, load, and reliability testing
- API testing and backend validation
- Security testing and compliance
- Developer experience and engineering productivity
- Observability, monitoring, and incident reduction
- Outsourced QA and managed testing services
Buyer engagement angle: The best positioning is to connect your offer to a pain point. For example:
- Reduce release failures
- Increase test coverage
- Shorten QA cycles
- Improve developer productivity
- Lower production defects
- Scale automation with fewer manual steps
- Support faster digital transformation
That makes this audience much more actionable than a generic software conference list. If your client sells QA tools, engineering services, test management platforms, observability, DevOps software, training, or staffing, this is a high-fit event.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
Important: before finalizing the best buyer list, please share your client website. The ideal account list changes depending on what your client sells.
Example fit by client product:
- If the client sells test automation software, target engineering leaders, QA heads, and platform teams at product companies and enterprises.
- If the client sells QA services or outsourcing, target mid-market software companies, digital transformation teams, and consulting buyers.
- If the client sells DevOps or observability tools, target release engineering, SRE, platform engineering, and technical operations teams.
- If the client sells recruitment or staffing services, target engineering managers, talent acquisition leaders, and QA team leads.
- If the client sells training or certification products, target QA managers, engineering education teams, and upskilling leaders.
If you share the website, I can refine the sample buyer list into a more precise account-based targeting list with better prioritization.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
This event is a strong fit for attendee-list sales when the goal is to reach software quality, automation, engineering, and digital delivery professionals. It is not a broad consumer event; it is a niche B2B technology audience with high decision-making value.
Best buyer segments to collect:
- QA and test automation leaders
- Engineering managers and directors
- CTOs and VP Engineering
- DevOps and platform engineering teams
- Consulting and managed services firms
- Enterprise software and digital product companies
Quality rating for B2B attendee-list sales: 9/10
Why: The audience is specialized, commercially relevant, and likely to include people who influence software purchasing decisions. The only caution is that you should avoid overly broad segmentation and focus on titles tied to quality engineering, delivery, and technical leadership.
Next step: Share your client website, and I can review it and identify the best buyer companies, best job titles, and best industry filters for this event.
Data sheet
| Event Name | QA or the Highway |
| Event Date | June 12, 2026 |
| Event Status | Upcoming |
| Venue | The Ohio Union |
| City | Columbus |
| State / Region | Ohio |
| Country | United States |
| Organizer | Organizer not publicly confirmed in the verified data available for this report. |
| Official Event Website | Public official event website not verified in the source set used for this report. |
| Event Type | Professional conference focused on quality assurance, software testing, test automation, engineering excellence, DevOps, product delivery, and technology leadership. |
| Primary Category | IT & Technology |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Business Services |
| Audience Reach | Regional to national professional technology audience; exact reach not publicly confirmed. |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Low for numerical attendance; moderate for event theme and attendee profile based on event description provided. |
| Main Purpose of Event | To connect software quality, automation, engineering, DevOps, and product-delivery professionals around tooling, methods, process improvement, technical education, and vendor evaluation. |
QA or the Highway appears to be a specialized B2B technology conference centered on software quality assurance, testing, automation, engineering excellence, DevOps, and product delivery. Based on the event description available for this report, the audience is likely composed of practitioners and decision-makers responsible for improving release quality, delivery speed, testing maturity, and engineering team performance.
From a commercial perspective, this is a focused event rather than a mass-attendance expo. That makes it relevant for companies selling test automation software, QA platforms, observability tools, CI/CD infrastructure, secure development solutions, engineering productivity products, outsourced QA services, and technical training. The event is suitable for B2B attendee list building and outreach when the goal is precision targeting of software delivery stakeholders rather than broad volume.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| QA engineers and software testers | Software companies, enterprise IT teams, digital product organizations | Strong user-level influence on tool evaluation and workflow adoption | High relevance for testing tools, automation frameworks, training, and productivity solutions |
| Test automation engineers and SDETs | SaaS vendors, enterprise software teams, engineering consultancies | Technical evaluators and champions for automation platforms and integrations | Very high relevance for automation vendors, developer tools, and CI/CD platforms |
| Engineering managers and QA leaders | Mid-market and enterprise product engineering organizations | Budget influence, vendor shortlisting, team process ownership | Core audience for platform purchases, service contracts, and training investments |
| Directors and VPs of engineering | Technology companies, corporate software teams, digital transformation groups | Executive sponsor role in architecture, tooling, and engineering productivity decisions | High relevance for strategic software infrastructure, service partnerships, and multi-team rollouts |
| DevOps and platform engineering teams | Cloud-native companies, enterprise IT, development platform teams | Influence deployment automation, environment management, and release quality | High value for CI/CD, observability, container, test environment, and release tooling vendors |
| Product managers and technical program managers | Software product companies, enterprise PMOs, digital business units | Cross-functional influence on delivery quality, roadmap risk, and vendor buy-in | Relevant for quality analytics, release governance, and workflow collaboration tools |
| CTOs, CIOs, and heads of engineering | Growth-stage software firms, enterprises, digital-first businesses | Senior decision-maker authority for strategic software stack and service investments | Best fit for enterprise platforms, transformation services, and broad rollout solutions |
| QA consulting and outsourced testing firms | Professional services firms, managed testing providers, digital consultancies | Partnership and channel potential; some may also buy tools for delivery teams | Relevant for partnership sales, white-label tooling, and training solutions |
| Software architects and principal engineers | Advanced product teams, enterprise architecture groups | High technical authority in framework, integration, and architecture choices | Important for deep technical products, APIs, frameworks, and infrastructure |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbus | Local software teams, enterprise IT groups, university-adjacent technology community | Moderate to high | Host city audience likely includes local practitioners and managers seeking a one-day professional conference. |
| Ohio | Regional attendees from Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Dayton, Toledo, Akron | High | Strong regional draw is likely for a specialist QA and engineering event held in-state. |
| Midwest technology corridor | Nearby attendees from Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Illinois | Moderate | Reasonable travel market for engineering conferences, especially for technical leadership and specialist practitioner audiences. |
| United States national audience | Selective national attendance from software firms and speakers | Moderate | National reach is plausible for niche technical conferences, but public evidence was not sufficient to confirm broad national scale. |
| International | Not publicly confirmed | Low | No verified evidence in the source set used for this report to classify the event as meaningfully international. |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Regional | Primary classification | Based on the one-day format, Columbus venue, and available event description, the strongest expected draw is from Ohio and nearby Midwest technology markets. |
| National | Secondary potential reach | Specialized technical content can attract selective national attendees, but this was not sufficiently confirmed to classify the event as primarily national. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPMorganChase | Enterprise software and digital banking buyer | Large engineering organization with significant quality, release, automation, and platform needs. | jpmorganchase.com | Director of Quality Engineering, Engineering Manager, DevOps Director, VP Engineering | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Nationwide | Enterprise IT and application delivery buyer | Large Ohio-based enterprise likely to maintain testing, QA, platform, and software release teams. | nationwide.com | QA Manager, Director Engineering, IT Director, Platform Engineering Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Cardinal Health | Healthcare technology and enterprise systems buyer | Complex digital systems create demand for testing automation, quality governance, and DevOps tools. | cardinalhealth.com | Director QA, Director Applications, Engineering Director, Release Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Root Insurance | Digital product and software buyer | Technology-led insurance company with software delivery and application quality requirements. | joinroot.com | Engineering Manager, Head of QA, SDET Manager, VP Engineering | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| CoverMyMeds | Health-tech software buyer | Software platform environment where release quality, automation, and compliance-oriented testing matter. | covermymeds.com | Director Quality Engineering, Software Engineering Manager, Product Engineering Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Vertiv | Industrial technology and digital systems buyer | Relevant for software quality, connected systems testing, and enterprise engineering tooling. | vertiv.com | Engineering Director, Software Quality Manager, DevOps Manager, Product Engineering Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| OhioHealth | Healthcare IT buyer | Healthcare systems often buy application testing, security testing, and release process tooling. | ohiohealth.com | IT Director, Director of Applications, QA Lead, Digital Product Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| The Wendy's Company | Enterprise digital and customer platform buyer | Retail and restaurant digital platforms require release quality, app testing, and engineering efficiency. | wendys.com | Director Digital Engineering, QA Manager, Product Delivery Director, DevOps Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Bath & Body Works | Retail technology buyer | Omnichannel retail organizations invest in app quality, commerce testing, and release management. | bathandbodyworks.com | IT Director, Engineering Manager, QA Automation Lead, Product Technology Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Huntington National Bank | Financial services software buyer | Large application environments make quality engineering and secure release processes commercially relevant. | huntington.com | Director QA, Release Train Engineer, Engineering Director, DevOps Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Director of Quality Engineering | Engineering / Quality | Director | Often owns testing strategy, automation maturity, tooling evaluation, and team standards. |
| 2 | QA Manager | Quality Assurance | Manager | Direct operator of vendor pilots, team workflows, and process improvement purchases. |
| 3 | Test Automation Lead / SDET Manager | Engineering / QA Automation | Manager / Lead | Key technical influence on automation frameworks, test execution platforms, and integration decisions. |
| 4 | Engineering Manager | Software Engineering | Manager | Balances release speed and quality; influences adoption of developer and delivery tooling. |
| 5 | Director of Engineering | Engineering | Director | Common budget approver for tooling, team-scale enablement, and process transformation. |
| 6 | DevOps Manager / Platform Engineering Manager | DevOps / Platform | Manager | Owns CI/CD, test environments, observability, release automation, and pipeline reliability. |
| 7 | VP Engineering | Engineering Leadership | VP | Executive sponsor for broad vendor selection and quality transformation initiatives. |
| 8 | CTO / CIO | Executive | C-Level | Relevant for enterprise software stack, governance, security, and strategic modernization purchases. |
| 9 | Product Manager / Technical Program Manager | Product / PMO | Manager | Influences delivery quality, roadmap execution, and cross-functional tooling adoption. |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computer Software | Core audience for testing, automation, CI/CD, and engineering productivity. | Sell QA tools, developer tooling, observability, release management platforms. |
| 2 | Information Technology & Services | Broad IT services firms run development and quality teams for clients and internal products. | Target managed QA, consulting, and tooling buyers. |
| 3 | Computer Networking | Relevant for firms building network platforms and software-intensive infrastructure. | Sell test automation, release validation, and monitoring solutions. |
| 4 | Internet | Digital-first companies require rapid release quality and continuous testing. | Target growth-stage product teams and web platform buyers. |
| 5 | Financial Services | High compliance, high-availability software environments create strong QA demand. | Sell secure testing, regression automation, release governance. |
| 6 | Insurance | Insurance carriers increasingly depend on digital products and enterprise application quality. | Target app modernization and quality engineering programs. |
| 7 | Hospital & Health Care | Healthcare systems run critical internal software and patient-facing platforms. | Sell testing, compliance support, digital quality solutions. |
| 8 | Retail | Retail digital commerce and mobile platforms require continuous release testing. | Target e-commerce QA, app performance, omnichannel release management. |
| 9 | Computer & Network Security | Security-oriented engineering teams often overlap with secure SDLC and testing workflows. | Sell security testing, code validation, pipeline controls. |
| 10 | Management Consulting | Consultancies frequently deliver QA transformation and engineering improvement programs. | Partner/channel opportunity and end-buyer for training and platforms. |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. | Unconfirmed | No verified organizer attendance figure available in the source set used for this report | Do not use a volume-based list expectation without organizer data. |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified exhibitor prospectus or current exhibitor list available in the source set used | Could be sponsor-led rather than expo-led, but this is not confirmed. |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No attendee segment breakdown verified | Audience appears practitioner-heavy based on event description. |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified agenda or speaker directory available in the source set used | Speaker-based targeting may become viable once agenda is published. |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified sponsor list available in the source set used | Potentially useful later for competitor and partner mapping. |
| Historical attendance | No verified prior-year attendance data found in the source set used for this report | Historical / prior-year evidence unavailable | No official prior-year public figures verified | Use caution when forecasting list size. |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality assurance | Improve software quality, reduce release risk, increase defect visibility | Position measurable quality outcomes, governance, and team efficiency | QA platforms, test management, reporting dashboards, consulting |
| Test automation | Scale regression testing and shorten release cycles | Demo time savings, framework coverage, and CI integration | Automation tools, low-code testing, browser/device testing, API testing |
| DevOps and CI/CD | Improve deployment reliability and test pipeline speed | Show pipeline optimization, environment orchestration, and release confidence | CI/CD tools, platform engineering services, release automation, environment management |
| Engineering productivity | Reduce manual effort and improve team throughput | Lead with ROI, cycle-time reduction, and developer experience improvements | Developer tooling, workflow automation, analytics, collaboration products |
| Observability and reliability | Faster issue detection and root-cause analysis | Connect pre-release testing to post-release production insight | Monitoring, logging, tracing, reliability engineering tools |
| Security testing | Reduce risk earlier in the software lifecycle | Align with secure SDLC, release governance, and compliance pressure | AppSec testing, static analysis, dynamic testing, policy enforcement |
| Training and upskilling | Close skill gaps in automation, modern QA, and delivery practices | Offer certification pathways, workshops, and team enablement | Training services, workshops, bootcamps, enterprise learning programs |
| Outsourced QA and specialist services | Expand delivery capacity or access niche expertise | Target teams facing release bottlenecks, transformation, or hiring gaps | Managed QA, augmentation, specialist engineering services |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | Very High | Audience profile is highly aligned to software quality, automation, DevOps, and engineering tooling purchases. |
| Decision-maker availability | High | Technical conferences typically include a mix of influencers and budget owners, especially manager-to-director level engineering leaders. |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Potential is good if agenda, sponsor, speaker, or registration partner data becomes available; current public data is limited. |
| Apollo targeting potential | Very High | Roles, departments, and industries are clearly targetable in Apollo with precise engineering and QA filters. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Strong for Ohio and adjacent Midwest markets, with selective national overlays. |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use technical pain-point messaging around release quality, automation coverage, cycle time, and engineering efficiency. |
| Overall lead quality | High | Especially strong for specialized B2B technology vendors; weaker for broad, non-technical offers. |
| Best use case | High | Ideal for focused prospecting, sponsor targeting, speaker-org targeting, and QA/engineering persona-based outbound campaigns. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Current public verification gaps limit certainty around volume, named participants, and attendee count. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Computer Software; Information Technology & Services; Internet; Financial Services; Insurance; Hospital & Health Care; Retail; Computer & Network Security; Management Consulting; Computer Networking | Build a high-fit QA and engineering buyer universe. |
| Departments | Engineering; Information Technology; Product Management; Operations | Capture both technical implementers and strategic buyers. |
| Seniority | Manager; Director; VP; CXO; Head | Prioritize economic buyers and tool-evaluation owners. |
| Job titles | Director of Quality Engineering; QA Manager; Quality Engineering Manager; Engineering Manager; Director of Engineering; VP Engineering; DevOps Manager; Platform Engineering Manager; SDET Manager; Test Automation Lead; Release Manager; CTO; CIO; Product Engineering Director | Precision-target the most relevant software quality and delivery stakeholders. |
| Geography | United States; Ohio; Columbus; Cleveland; Cincinnati; Dayton; Indianapolis; Detroit; Pittsburgh; Chicago | Reflect likely regional draw while keeping national expansion options. |
| Employee size | 51-200; 201-500; 501-1,000; 1,001-5,000; 5,001+ | Focus on companies more likely to have dedicated QA, DevOps, and platform functions. |
| Keywords | quality engineering, test automation, QA, SDET, DevOps, platform engineering, CI/CD, software testing, release engineering, observability, reliability engineering, developer productivity | Improve intent alignment and persona relevance. |
| Technologies, if relevant | Cloud platforms, CI/CD tooling, testing frameworks, observability stacks | Useful when the offer integrates with existing engineering ecosystems. |
| Revenue range, if relevant | Mid-market to enterprise | Supports larger engineering teams and recurring software budgets. |
| Company type | Public and private companies with internal software development teams | Ensures the prospect base includes likely buyers rather than non-technical firms. |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| User-supplied event details | Provided event information | Event name, city, state, country, venue, and event date range | Moderate |
| User-supplied event description | Reference description | Event theme, likely attendee profile, and B2B use-case framing | Moderate |
| The Ohio Union | Venue website | Venue identity and Columbus location context | High |
| City of Columbus | Government website | City and state geographic verification | High |
| Current-year official event website / agenda / organizer page | Primary-source check | Organizer, attendance, sponsors, exhibitors, speakers, and participant data were not publicly verified in the source set available for this report | Low / unavailable |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to QA or the Highway — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.