
11th International Conference on Social Sciences in the 21st Century (ICS21)
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on Social Sciences in the 21st Century (ICS21) — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
11th International Conference on Social Sciences in the 21st Century (ICS21)
Event type: Academic conference, research forum, social sciences symposium, interdisciplinary knowledge-sharing event
Date: Please confirm the exact edition date from the official event website before campaign execution, because conference dates can vary by year and edition.
Venue: Please confirm the official host venue and city for the exact 11th edition being targeted. ICS21 is positioned as an international academic conference and typically attracts delegates from universities, research institutions, policy organizations, nonprofit groups, and knowledge-sector stakeholders.
Estimated attendance: Typically a compact to mid-sized academic conference audience, usually best treated as an estimated 150 to 400 attendees unless the official organizer page confirms a different figure. The value of this event is not mass footfall, but the concentration of researchers, faculty, policy thinkers, and institutional decision-makers.
1️⃣ Who attends: Buyers / attendees
ICS21 is not a mass-market consumer expo and not a procurement-heavy industrial trade show. It is a knowledge-driven conference built around research, academic exchange, publication opportunities, interdisciplinary collaboration, and policy discussion. Because of that, the strongest commercial fit comes from organizations that serve higher education, research communities, public policy ecosystems, training providers, consulting firms, publishers, nonprofit institutions, and digital knowledge platforms.
Main attendee groups generally include:
- University professors, lecturers, assistant professors, associate professors, and department heads
- Research scholars, postdoctoral researchers, PhD candidates, and academic project leads
- Deans, academic directors, faculty coordinators, and higher education administrators
- Policy analysts, public affairs specialists, social researchers, and think tank representatives
- Nonprofit leaders, foundation program managers, and social development professionals
- Academic publishers, journal representatives, conference partners, and research dissemination teams
- Education technology providers, learning platform teams, and academic services companies
- Government, intergovernmental, and institutional stakeholders connected to social policy, development, education, and research
From a buyer-fit perspective, the best targets are usually not every attendee equally. The most valuable attendee segments are:
- Higher education decision-makers
- Research administration and academic program leaders
- Policy and nonprofit professionals
- Academic publishing and knowledge-service providers
- Education technology and research support organizations
In short, this event is strongest for reaching a curated, intellectually engaged audience rather than a huge exhibition-driven buyer population. The buying potential is concentrated in institutional influence, partnerships, subscriptions, research tools, learning solutions, publishing services, grants, and policy-oriented services.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
The exact venue and city should be verified for the edition you want to work on, because academic conferences may rotate location or operate with changing venue partners. That said, ICS21 is positioned as an international conference, so the geographic profile is usually broader than a normal local seminar.
Expected attendee origin:
- Host-country academics and researchers
- Regional attendees from nearby countries
- International faculty and graduate researchers
- Delegates from universities, policy institutes, and nonprofit organizations across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and North America
For planning purposes, We should treat attendee origin as:
- Local: Faculty, institutions, and research professionals from the host city and host country
- Regional: Strong cross-border academic participation if the conference is in a major education hub
- International: Researchers, scholars, and institutional participants traveling for presentation, publication, and networking opportunities
Because this is a social sciences conference, attendees often come from internationally connected environments where conference participation, abstract submissions, collaborations, and journal visibility matter more than trade floor traffic.
3️⃣ Audience reach
Reach type: International academic reach with strong institutional relevance
This conference should be classified as global in theme and usually international in attendee makeup, even if the total attendance volume is modest. The social sciences category naturally attracts cross-border participation because topics such as education, governance, inequality, migration, media, culture, public policy, social development, psychology, and economics are globally relevant.
We would describe the audience reach as:
- Local relevance: Host-city and host-country universities, colleges, and research communities
- National relevance: Scholars and institutional professionals from across the host nation
- International relevance: Cross-border paper presenters, faculty, graduate researchers, nonprofit delegates, and knowledge-sector professionals
This makes ICS21 suitable for clients whose product or service works across academia, training, research support, publishing, policy research, digital libraries, scholarly tools, survey platforms, or institutional partnerships.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a strong sample account set for this event category. Since ICS21 is an academic and research-oriented conference, We are focusing on institutions and organizations that are realistic buyer fits for social sciences audiences: universities, publishers, research platforms, policy organizations, nonprofit and education-service players.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com | Institutional Sales Director / Research Solutions Manager / Partnerships Manager | Strong fit because social sciences conferences attract researchers, faculty, and institutions that use journals, databases, and academic workflow tools. |
| 2 | Springer Nature | https://www.springernature.com | Academic Partnerships Manager / Institutional Account Manager | Excellent fit for scholarly publishing, social sciences content, open research, and institutional relationships with universities and researchers. |
| 3 | Taylor & Francis Group | https://www.taylorandfrancis.com | Journal Development Manager / Institutional Sales Manager | Very relevant for social sciences publishing, conference-linked content promotion, and university engagement. |
| 4 | SAGE Publishing | https://us.sagepub.com | Academic Library Sales Manager / Faculty Engagement Manager | SAGE has deep alignment with social sciences, education, research methods, and academic library buying cycles. |
| 5 | Wiley | https://www.wiley.com | Institutional Account Manager / Academic Solutions Director | Strong buyer fit for journal subscriptions, digital learning tools, publishing services, and research ecosystems. |
| 6 | ProQuest | https://about.proquest.com | Library Sales Manager / Research Solutions Consultant | Relevant because conference audiences include researchers and librarians who influence digital content and database adoption. |
| 7 | EBSCO Information Services | https://www.ebsco.com | Regional Sales Manager / Academic Account Executive | Good fit for library databases, institutional access models, and social science research communities. |
| 8 | JSTOR | https://www.jstor.org | Institutional Participation Manager / Academic Outreach Manager | Highly aligned with scholars, librarians, and universities attending interdisciplinary social sciences events. |
| 9 | Qualtrics | https://www.qualtrics.com | Higher Education Account Executive / Research Program Manager | Social sciences researchers often rely on surveys, behavioral research, and experience data tools, making this a strong buyer fit. |
| 10 | SurveyMonkey | https://www.surveymonkey.com | Education Sales Manager / Enterprise Account Executive | Good fit for faculty, institutions, and research professionals running surveys and social research projects. |
| 11 | Blackboard | https://www.blackboard.com | Regional Director, Higher Education / Academic Technology Partnerships Manager | Useful for reaching university leaders and academic administrators interested in digital learning and institutional delivery. |
| 12 | Canvas by Instructure | https://www.instructure.com | Higher Education Sales Director / Academic Success Manager | Relevant because many attendees work in university teaching, course delivery, and digital academic environments. |
| 13 | Coursera | https://www.coursera.org | University Partnerships Director / Academic Alliances Manager | Strong fit for institutions exploring online learning, credentialing, lifelong learning, and academic partnership models. |
| 14 | Pearson | https://www.pearson.com | Higher Education Partnerships Manager / Academic Solutions Director | Relevant to education delivery, assessment, learning content, and university-facing social sciences programs. |
| 15 | RAND Corporation | https://www.rand.org | Research Program Director / Policy Research Manager | Excellent institutional fit because policy research organizations align closely with conference themes in social sciences and public issues. |
| 16 | Brookings Institution | https://www.brookings.edu | Program Director / Research Fellow Outreach Lead | Think tank and policy-oriented organizations are highly relevant where attendees include social scientists and governance researchers. |
| 17 | UNESCO | https://www.unesco.org | Programme Specialist / Partnerships Officer | Strong fit for education, culture, development, social policy, and international knowledge exchange audiences. |
| 18 | World Bank | https://www.worldbank.org | Social Development Specialist / Knowledge Partnerships Manager | Relevant for development research, policy discussions, institutional collaboration, and global social science themes. |
| 19 | Oxford University Press | https://global.oup.com | Institutional Sales Manager / Academic Publishing Manager | Very strong social sciences alignment through books, journals, scholarly resources, and institutional reach. |
| 20 | Cambridge University Press & Assessment | https://www.cambridge.org | Academic Account Manager / Regional Institutional Sales Lead | Good buyer fit for social sciences publishing, assessment, institutional content, and faculty-facing academic solutions. |
Top 5 sample accounts We would prioritize first: Elsevier, Springer Nature, SAGE Publishing, Qualtrics, RAND Corporation.
These five create a balanced first-cut sample across publishing, research tools, and policy research. That gives the outreach mix both academic credibility and commercial relevance.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target
- Dean
- Associate Dean
- Department Chair
- Head of Research
- Research Director
- Professor
- Associate Professor
- Assistant Professor
- Faculty Director
- Academic Program Director
- Director of Institutional Partnerships
- Library Director
- Scholarly Communications Manager
- Policy Analyst
- Program Manager
- Nonprofit Partnerships Director
- Education Partnerships Manager
- Institutional Sales Manager
- Research Solutions Manager
- Learning Technology Director
Best industries to use
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- Research
- E-Learning
- Information Services
- Publishing
- Nonprofit Organization Management
- International Affairs
- Public Policy
- Government Administration
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Market Research
- Information Technology & Services
- Management Consulting
- Online Media
Event type classification
- Academic conference
- Research presentation event
- Interdisciplinary social sciences forum
- Higher education networking platform
- Policy and research exchange event
From a commercial targeting standpoint, the event is strongest for education, research, publishing, surveys, policy intelligence, nonprofit collaboration, and institutional subscriptions rather than traditional supply-chain procurement.
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected total footfall
Estimated total attendance: approximately 150 to 400 attendees, unless the official organizer confirms a higher or lower number.
Why this estimate makes sense:
- International academic conferences in the social sciences often operate at a mid-sized scale rather than trade-show scale
- The core audience is usually presenters, faculty, research delegates, postgraduate scholars, and institutional participants
- Networking quality is often more important than raw footfall
- Academic conferences can include in-person and hybrid participation, which affects visible venue traffic
This means ICS21 should not be judged by the same standards as a giant expo. Even with a smaller crowd, it can still be highly valuable if the client needs access to concentrated academic, policy, or research-facing professionals.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Likely focus areas
- Social sciences research and interdisciplinary scholarship
- Education, pedagogy, and learning systems
- Public policy and governance
- Social development and inequality
- Psychology, sociology, and human behavior
- Economics, political science, and international relations
- Media, communication, and culture studies
- Research methods, data analysis, and academic publishing
- Institutional collaboration and cross-border research networks
Best engagement angles
- Research tools and survey platforms
- Academic publishing and journal partnerships
- Library resources and database access
- University partnerships and program development
- Policy intelligence and think tank collaboration
- Learning technology and digital education solutions
- Conference support, abstract systems, and scholarly workflow services
The strongest message positioning for this event is around reaching social science professionals, academic leaders, institutional researchers, policy stakeholders, and education-sector decision-makers. That framing is much more precise and commercially useful than a broad “conference audience” label.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
Before We finalize the best buyer categories for ICS21, We should review your client website first.
Please share the client website, and We will review the product, positioning, and use case so We can tell you the best buyer segments based on the client requirement.
This step matters a lot for ICS21 because the right audience changes depending on what the client actually sells:
- If the client sells academic publishing services, We should prioritize publishers, journal managers, faculty researchers, and scholarly communications teams.
- If the client sells survey tools or research software, We should prioritize professors, researchers, institutional research offices, and program evaluation teams.
- If the client sells learning platforms or education technology, We should prioritize deans, academic technology leaders, instructional design teams, and university administrators.
- If the client sells policy, consulting, or nonprofit solutions, We should prioritize think tanks, public policy institutes, foundations, and international development organizations.
- If the client sells training, certification, or executive education solutions, We should prioritize higher education institutions, professional training organizations, and academic program leaders.
Once We review the client site, We can narrow the list into the best-fit accounts, titles, and industry combinations for this specific event.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
ICS21 is a strong event when the client wants access to a curated academic and institutional audience rather than a high-volume commercial exhibition crowd.
Best buyer segments to prioritize:
- Universities and higher education institutions
- Academic publishers and journal groups
- Research platforms and survey software providers
- Policy institutes and think tanks
- Nonprofit and international development organizations
- Library, database, and scholarly information providers
- Education technology companies serving higher education
Overall quality rating for B2B event targeting: 7.5/10
Why the rating is strong:
- International and intellectually credible audience
- Good concentration of faculty, researchers, and institutional professionals
- Strong fit for education, research, publishing, and policy-related products
- Better quality of professional relevance than many generic academic events
Main caution:
- Attendance volume is likely moderate, not massive
- Commercial intent is softer than at pure procurement events
- The event works best when the client has a clear higher education, research, publishing, nonprofit, or policy-facing offer
Bottom line: ICS21 is a worthwhile event for targeted outreach if your client serves universities, researchers, policy professionals, academic publishers, or education-sector institutions. Please send the client website, and We will review it and tell you the best buyer categories, job titles, and industry fit for this conference.
Data sheet
| Event Name | 11th International Conference on Social Sciences in the 21st Century (ICS21) |
| Event Date | Exact 11th edition date not confirmed in the materials provided; official event page should be checked before launch of any campaign. |
| Event Status | Upcoming, subject to official date verification |
| Venue | John McIntyre Conference Centre, The University of Edinburgh |
| City | Edinburgh |
| State / Region | Scotland |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Organizer | Organizer name requires confirmation from the official event website for the exact 11th edition. |
| Official Event Website | Official event website requires confirmation before campaign execution. |
| Event Type | Academic conference, research forum, social sciences symposium, interdisciplinary knowledge-sharing event |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Science & Research; Business Services |
| Audience Reach | International academic and policy-facing reach, with likely concentration in the UK and Europe |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Estimated 150 to 400 attendees based on the event format described in the materials provided. Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Estimated |
| Main Purpose of Event | Research presentation, interdisciplinary dialogue, publication-oriented participation, institutional networking, policy exchange, and academic partnership development. |
The 11th International Conference on Social Sciences in the 21st Century (ICS21) is positioned as an international academic conference focused on social sciences research, interdisciplinary exchange, and scholarly discussion. Based on the event description provided, the conference is designed for university researchers, faculty, doctoral candidates, policy contributors, nonprofit leaders, and knowledge-sector professionals who participate in paper presentations, panel sessions, academic networking, and collaboration-building.
From a commercial perspective, ICS21 is not primarily a high-volume procurement expo. Its value lies in concentrated access to institutional influencers and professional knowledge buyers across higher education, research support, policy analysis, training, publishing, data services, and academic technology. This makes the event more relevant for targeted B2B outreach to research-serving vendors than for mass attendee list monetization.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| University faculty and research leads | Universities, social science departments, research centres | Influence spending on research tools, databases, publishing, training, conference partnerships | High relevance for academic software, journals, data providers, and training vendors |
| Department heads and academic administrators | Higher education institutions | Budget oversight, departmental subscriptions, partnership approvals | Relevant for institutional sales and multi-user solutions |
| Doctoral researchers and postdoctoral scholars | Universities, research institutes | User-level influence on adoption of software, data, and publishing services | Useful for pipeline building and product trials, though not always final budget owners |
| Research office and grants administration staff | University research support offices, funding administration teams | Influence compliance tools, proposal services, workflow platforms | High-value audience for grant support, compliance, and reporting products |
| Policy researchers and think-tank analysts | Public policy institutes, think tanks, advocacy bodies | Buy or influence evidence platforms, survey tools, advisory services | Relevant for research data, consulting, and stakeholder engagement services |
| Nonprofit and NGO program leaders | Foundations, charities, NGOs, social impact organizations | Influence monitoring, evaluation, training, impact measurement purchases | Relevant for evaluation software, policy consulting, and learning platforms |
| Academic publishers and journal representatives | Scholarly publishers, conference publication partners | Acquire authors, institutional relationships, licensing opportunities | High relevance for publication services and content distribution partnerships |
| Training and professional development providers | Academic skills providers, e-learning firms, executive education organizations | Sell directly or partner with institutions | Relevant for methods training, writing support, and certification products |
| Research technology and data solution buyers | Universities, institutes, libraries, labs, policy organizations | Evaluate databases, survey platforms, analytics, transcription, citation tools | Strong commercial relevance for specialist academic tech vendors |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edinburgh | Local academic community, host institution affiliates, nearby research partners | Moderate | Host-city convenience supports faculty, students, and local policy institutions |
| Scotland | Universities, public policy groups, educational bodies, NGOs | High | Likely strong pull from Edinburgh, Glasgow, St Andrews, Aberdeen, and Dundee |
| United Kingdom | National academic and research attendees from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland | High | Good addressable market for university and policy-sector lead generation |
| Europe | International researchers, visiting scholars, social science networks | Medium to High | International branding suggests cross-border academic participation, especially from Europe |
| Global academic market | Authors, presenters, independent researchers, policy thinkers | Medium | International conference positioning broadens prospecting relevance beyond the UK, though actual buyer density may remain academic rather than commercial |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Primary classification | The event is positioned as an international conference and therefore has global academic branding, even if attendance volume is comparatively compact. |
| National | Secondary practical reach | For outreach, the strongest concentration is likely to come from UK-based universities, institutes, and policy organizations. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Edinburgh | Host-side university | Venue alignment and strong social sciences footprint make it a natural target for research, training, and academic services | ed.ac.uk | Head of School, Research Director, Library Director, Procurement Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Glasgow | University | Major UK research institution with social sciences and policy research demand | gla.ac.uk | Dean, Research Support Manager, Procurement Manager, Library Acquisitions Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of St Andrews | University | Research-led institution with interdisciplinary humanities and social sciences relevance | st-andrews.ac.uk | Research Director, Faculty Administrator, Systems Librarian, Contracts Officer | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| The University of Manchester | University | Large social sciences and public policy buyer base for data, publishing, and research services | manchester.ac.uk | Faculty Director, Research Operations Manager, Procurement Business Partner | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| London School of Economics and Political Science | Specialist higher education institution | High-fit institution for social science methods, policy research, and publication services | lse.ac.uk | Department Manager, Research Manager, Library Collections Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| King's College London | University | Relevant for social policy, international affairs, and interdisciplinary research procurement | kcl.ac.uk | Head of Department, Procurement Category Manager, Research Development Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Oxford | University | High-value institutional buyer for academic technology, publishing, and data services | ox.ac.uk | Research Services Manager, Library Procurement Lead, Department Administrator | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Cambridge | University | Major research-intensive buyer across social science departments and libraries | cam.ac.uk | Faculty Operations Manager, Research Grants Manager, Collections Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| The British Academy | Research and funding body | Relevant for funding, policy dialogue, academic convening, and research support ecosystems | thebritishacademy.ac.uk | Programme Director, Research Funding Manager, Partnerships Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Economic and Social Research Council (UKRI) | Research funding organization | Core ecosystem player for social science research funding and methods-related initiatives | esrc.ukri.org | Programme Manager, Research Portfolio Manager, Partnerships Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Nuffield Foundation | Foundation / policy research funder | Relevant for evidence-based social research, grantmaking, and policy-linked evaluation | nuffieldfoundation.org | Programme Head, Research Manager, Evaluation Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Institute for Fiscal Studies | Think tank / policy research institute | High-fit prospect for data, policy analysis tools, and evidence communication services | ifs.org.uk | Research Director, Programme Manager, Operations Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Research Director | Research | Director | Owns research priorities and influences adoption of tools, datasets, and partnerships |
| 2 | Head of Department / School | Academic Affairs | Director / VP | Controls department budgets and approves strategic vendor relationships |
| 3 | Research Development Manager | Research Support | Manager | Relevant for grants, workflows, proposal tools, and collaboration platforms |
| 4 | Library Director | Library / Information Services | Director | Key buyer for academic databases, journals, and institutional access tools |
| 5 | Procurement Manager | Procurement | Manager | Important for formal vendor onboarding and contract review in universities and research bodies |
| 6 | Category Manager | Procurement / Finance | Manager | Relevant where spending is centralized by category such as software, subscriptions, or services |
| 7 | Programme Manager | Programmes / Research Delivery | Manager | Strong target in think tanks, foundations, NGOs, and policy bodies |
| 8 | Partnerships Director | Partnerships / External Relations | Director | Relevant for conference collaboration, sponsorship, and content partnerships |
| 9 | Training Manager | Learning & Development | Manager | Relevant for methods training, academic writing, and professional development services |
| 10 | Executive Director | Executive Office | C-Level / Director | Useful target in associations, institutes, and nonprofits attending policy-oriented academic events |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higher Education | Core attendee base for an international social sciences conference | Institutional sales, research tools, databases, training, publishing |
| 2 | Research | Fits research institutes, independent centres, and evidence organizations | Analytics, survey, evaluation, and collaboration tools |
| 3 | Education Management | Relevant for institutions and service providers managing educational programs | Training, programme delivery, learning systems |
| 4 | Nonprofit Organization Management | Matches NGOs and social impact bodies participating in policy-oriented research dialogue | M&E tools, research support, stakeholder engagement |
| 5 | Public Policy | Strong fit for policy institutes and public affairs research organizations | Evidence platforms, analysis support, policy communications |
| 6 | Think Tanks | Directly relevant to conference themes around policy and social research | Research subscriptions, partnerships, events, consulting |
| 7 | Government Administration | Relevant where public agencies engage in policy, education, or research partnerships | Policy evaluation, surveys, training, impact reporting |
| 8 | Information Services | Covers data, indexing, knowledge, and library-oriented providers | Academic content, discovery tools, metadata services |
| 9 | E-Learning | Relevant for skills training, methods education, and professional development offerings | Research methods training and institutional learning solutions |
| 10 | Professional Training & Coaching | Applicable to research upskilling, writing support, and facilitation vendors | Workshop partnerships and capability building |
| 11 | Publishing | Scholarly publishing is structurally linked to conference participation and paper dissemination | Journal partnerships, open access, proceedings, author services |
| 12 | Management Consulting | Relevant for policy, social impact, and institutional advisory providers | Advisory, evaluation, and programme design services |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | 150 to 400 | Estimated | User-provided event description and typical compact academic conference range | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified exhibitor prospectus available in the materials provided | Academic conferences may have limited exhibitor activity versus trade shows |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official buyer program identified in the materials provided | This is an academic conference rather than a formal hosted-buyer event |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Agenda and speaker directory not verified in the materials provided | Should be checked on the official agenda page before any speaker-based targeting |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official sponsor page verified in the materials provided | Sponsorship appears possible but not verified |
| Historical attendance | No verified historical organizer figure found in the materials provided | Historical data unavailable | No confirmed prior-year attendance data supplied | Use estimated range only unless the organizer publishes prior-year results |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research methods | Better data collection, analysis, survey design, and mixed-methods capability | Workshops, demos, academic partnerships | Survey platforms, qualitative analysis tools, statistics software |
| Publishing and dissemination | Journal access, manuscript support, open-access options, proceedings publication | Author outreach, institutional licensing, editorial partnerships | Publishing services, indexing, editorial technology, repository tools |
| Policy and public impact | Evidence translation, stakeholder communication, impact reporting | Consultative selling to think tanks, universities, and NGOs | Policy communications, evaluation frameworks, impact measurement tools |
| Academic collaboration | Cross-institution networking, project development, interdisciplinary teaming | Partnership-led outreach and relationship nurturing | Collaboration platforms, networking software, partnership facilitation |
| Training and capability building | Methods upskilling, writing support, grant readiness, presentation training | Small-group demonstrations and follow-up institutional offers | E-learning, workshops, coaching, professional development subscriptions |
| Research infrastructure | Access to databases, digital libraries, transcription, reference management, compliance support | Institutional buyer meetings and procurement-oriented follow-up | Academic SaaS, information services, workflow and repository systems |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | High | Strong if the seller serves academia, research, publishing, data, policy, or training markets; weaker for unrelated verticals. |
| Decision-maker availability | Medium | Institutional influencers attend, but formal sign-off may sit with procurement or central administration beyond the event floor. |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Useful for curated relationship-building, but likely not a high-volume attendee list environment. |
| Apollo targeting potential | High | Good fit for account-based targeting across universities, research bodies, nonprofits, and policy organizations. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Strong UK and Europe concentration supports regional segmentation and institutional clustering. |
| Best outreach approach | High | Use value-led outreach tied to research outcomes, publication support, grant efficiency, or institutional capability building. |
| Overall lead quality | High | High-quality niche event for specialized B2B offers; not ideal for broad commercial list sales. |
| Best use case | High | Account-based prospecting, speaker/presenter mapping, higher education outreach, and institutional partnership development. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Event may have limited direct purchasing activity, limited public attendee transparency, and a smaller total contact universe than commercial expos. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Research; Education Management; Nonprofit Organization Management; Public Policy; Think Tanks; Government Administration; Information Services; E-Learning; Publishing | Build a focused academic and policy buyer universe |
| Departments | Research, Academic Affairs, Library, Procurement, Partnerships, Operations, Learning & Development | Find both user-side and decision-making functions |
| Seniority | Director, Head, VP, Manager, Officer, Dean, Executive | Prioritize budget owners and functional influencers |
| Job titles | Research Director, Head of Department, Dean, Research Development Manager, Programme Manager, Library Director, Procurement Manager, Category Manager, Partnerships Director, Training Manager | Capture high-fit roles seen around social science research ecosystems |
| Geography | United Kingdom first; Scotland; England; Ireland; selected Western Europe | Mirror likely attendee concentration and practical travel radius |
| Employee size | 51-200; 201-500; 501-1000; 1001-5000; 5001+ | Focus on institutions with structured budgets and repeat procurement needs |
| Keywords | social sciences, public policy, research institute, academic publishing, evidence, evaluation, higher education, interdisciplinary research, grants, library services | Increase precision where industry tags are broad |
| Technologies | Optional, depending on client offer | Useful only if selling software that integrates with existing research or library systems |
| Revenue range | Optional; prioritize established institutions where available | Can refine to larger organizations with recurring budgets |
| Company type | Universities, research institutes, nonprofits, foundations, think tanks, government-linked research bodies | Aligns targeting with likely ICS21 institutional profile |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Edinburgh – John McIntyre Conference Centre | Venue website | Venue identity and host location in Edinburgh | High |
| Conference title and location details supplied in the request | Requester-provided input | Event name, city, region, country, and venue provided for report drafting | Medium |
| Organizer official event page | Primary source required | Must be checked to confirm exact 11th edition date, organizer name, current agenda, attendee categories, and any speaker or sponsor lists | Required before campaign execution |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on Social Sciences in the 21st Century (ICS21) — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.