
11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL)
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL)
Event type: Academic conference, higher education, teacher development, education research, learning innovation, curriculum, pedagogy, educational technology, international scholarly networking.
Best-fit commercial view: This event is best understood as a research-led education conference rather than a mass-market trade show. The strongest professional value comes from universities, colleges, education institutes, teacher training organizations, academic publishers, education technology providers, assessment companies, research organizations, and professional development institutions that want to engage education decision-makers, faculty leaders, and research-active professionals.
1️⃣ Who attends: buyers / attendees
The attendee mix at ICETL is usually centered on the global education and academic community. Unlike a pure expo where procurement teams dominate, this conference tends to attract intellectual, programmatic, institutional, and partnership-oriented audiences. That means the best professional targets are often academic and administrative decision-makers rather than conventional purchasing managers.
Main attendee groups typically include:
- University professors, lecturers, assistant professors, associate professors, and academic researchers in education and related disciplines
- Deans, associate deans, heads of department, program directors, curriculum leaders, and faculty administrators
- Teacher educators, instructional designers, education consultants, and pedagogical specialists
- School leaders, principals, vice principals, academic coordinators, and teacher training heads
- Researchers in teaching methods, learning sciences, curriculum design, inclusive education, educational psychology, and digital learning
- Representatives from colleges, teacher training institutes, research centers, think tanks, and nonprofit education organizations
- Education technology companies, learning platform providers, assessment firms, academic publishing groups, and professional development vendors
- Graduate students, doctoral researchers, postdoctoral scholars, and early-career academics presenting research
- Policy researchers, education associations, quality assurance bodies, and international academic collaboration teams
From a business-fit perspective, the highest-value audience segments are usually:
- Deans and academic directors who influence institutional partnerships and program adoption
- Directors of teaching and learning who evaluate instructional models and faculty development tools
- Curriculum leaders and instructional design heads who shape course delivery and learning outcomes
- Professional development managers and teacher training coordinators responsible for educator upskilling
- Education technology leaders exploring tools for digital teaching, assessment, engagement, or analytics
- Academic publishers and research solution providers seeking scholarly and institutional relationships
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
ICETL is typically organized as an international academic conference and may rotate by city and country depending on the edition. For the 11th edition, the exact venue, host city, and dates should be confirmed from the official event website before final campaign planning. The reason this matters is that geography affects not only travel patterns but also the buyer density by institution type, language profile, and regional education priorities.
Even when hosted in one physical destination, the conference generally attracts attendees from multiple regions because education research conferences often pull abstract submitters, speakers, and delegates from:
- Europe
- North America
- Asia-Pacific
- Middle East
- Africa
- Selected Latin American institutions
Typical geographic origin of attendees includes:
- Faculty and researchers from international universities
- Teacher education colleges and pedagogical institutes
- Independent scholars and education consultants
- Regional education associations and policy bodies
- Cross-border academic collaboration teams
If the event is hosted in Europe, we would normally expect a stronger European attendee share with international delegates joining from Asia, the Middle East, North America, and Africa. If hosted in Asia or the Middle East, we would usually expect stronger regional participation from nearby university networks combined with a core international research audience.
3️⃣ Audience reach
Reach type: International / global academic audience with regional concentration based on venue.
This conference has stronger global relevance than a purely local teacher workshop because research conferences in education attract abstract submissions, paper presentations, panel discussions, and scholarly participation across borders. However, it is important to frame the reach correctly:
- It is not a mass-consumer education event
- It is not primarily a K-12 parent audience event
- It is not a general public expo
- It is a focused academic and professional education ecosystem event
So the best audience classification is:
- Global in brand and academic participation
- International in delegate composition
- Professionally niche in subject matter
- High relevance for institutional and scholarly engagement
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a strong sample account list of organizations that align well with an education, teaching, learning, research, faculty development, curriculum, assessment, or academic innovation conference. Since this event is academically oriented, the most suitable account universe includes universities, publishers, edtech firms, teacher training providers, assessment organizations, and academic services companies.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pearson | https://www.pearson.com | Director of Higher Education Partnerships | Strong fit for higher education learning content, assessment solutions, digital courseware, and institutional teaching support. |
| 2 | McGraw Hill | https://www.mheducation.com | Senior Manager, Academic Partnerships | Relevant for curriculum, digital learning resources, course materials, and faculty-facing engagement in teaching and learning environments. |
| 3 | Cengage Group | https://www.cengagegroup.com | Director, Institutional Partnerships | Well aligned with higher education faculty, learning design, classroom technology, and student success solutions. |
| 4 | Instructure | https://www.instructure.com | Regional Director, Higher Education | Excellent fit for learning management systems, digital pedagogy, assessment workflows, and faculty enablement. |
| 5 | Blackboard | https://www.blackboard.com | Director of Academic Solutions | Strong fit for online learning, virtual teaching environments, course administration, and institutional digital transformation. |
| 6 | Turnitin | https://www.turnitin.com | Director, Institutional Sales | Highly relevant for academic integrity, writing assessment, feedback systems, and university teaching practices. |
| 7 | Coursera | https://www.coursera.org | Partnerships Director, Campus | Good fit for digital education, online course delivery, workforce-oriented learning, and institutional partnerships. |
| 8 | edX | https://www.edx.org | Director of University Partnerships | Aligned with online education, credentialing, course innovation, and global academic collaboration. |
| 9 | Wiley | https://www.wiley.com | Publishing Director, Education Research | Strong fit for scholarly publishing, education journals, research dissemination, and faculty engagement. |
| 10 | Springer Nature | https://www.springernature.com | Senior Editor, Education | Relevant for conference-oriented research communities, journal ecosystems, and academic publishing partnerships. |
| 11 | Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com | Director, Academic and Government Solutions | Strong buyer fit for research workflows, academic analytics, scholarly content, and university engagement. |
| 12 | Kahoot! | https://www.kahoot.com | Head of Education Partnerships | Good fit for classroom engagement, active learning, faculty innovation, and learner participation tools. |
| 13 | Quizizz | https://www.quizizz.com | Director of Institutional Growth | Relevant for formative assessment, interactive learning, student engagement, and digital instruction support. |
| 14 | Duolingo English Test | https://www.englishtest.duolingo.com | University Relations Director | Useful fit where institutions discuss assessment, admissions, language learning, and international student evaluation. |
| 15 | ETS | https://www.ets.org | Director of Higher Education Solutions | Highly relevant for assessment, learning measurement, teacher certification, and education research applications. |
| 16 | Cambridge University Press & Assessment | https://www.cambridge.org | Regional Partnerships Manager | Strong fit for academic publishing, English language learning, educational assessment, and institutional reach. |
| 17 | Oxford University Press | https://global.oup.com | Education Partnerships Manager | Relevant for scholarly publishing, teaching resources, language education, and academic audience engagement. |
| 18 | Anthology | https://www.anthology.com | Vice President, Higher Education Strategy | Strong fit for academic operations, learning platforms, student engagement, and institutional technology strategy. |
Top sample accounts to prioritize first: Pearson, Instructure, Turnitin, ETS, Wiley, Springer Nature, Coursera, and Cambridge University Press & Assessment. These represent a balanced mix of higher education solutions, learning platforms, assessment, publishing, and institutional engagement.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target
- Dean, School of Education
- Associate Dean, Academic Affairs
- Head of Department, Education
- Director of Teaching and Learning
- Director of Curriculum and Instruction
- Instructional Design Director
- Director of Faculty Development
- Academic Program Director
- Director of Online Learning
- Director of Educational Technology
- University Partnerships Director
- Institutional Sales Director
- Assessment Solutions Director
- Research Director
- Editor, Education Research
- Publishing Director
- Teacher Training Manager
- Professional Development Director
- Academic Innovation Lead
- Student Success Director
Best industry filters to use
- Education Management
- Higher Education
- Primary/Secondary Education
- E-Learning
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Software
- Publishing
- Research
- Nonprofit Organization Management
- Information Services
- Market Research
Event type classification
- International academic conference
- Research presentation and publication-oriented event
- Higher education and pedagogy-focused gathering
- Faculty, researcher, and institutional networking platform
- Suitable for partnership-led outreach more than general-volume product promotion
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected total footfall
Because this is a specialist academic conference, expected attendance is usually far smaller than a major commercial trade fair. The likely footfall range for a focused international education research event of this nature is generally in the 150 to 600 attendee range, depending on host city, accessibility, paper acceptance volume, hybrid participation options, and organizer strength.
A practical working estimate would be:
- Conservative estimate: 150–250 attendees
- Moderate estimate: 250–400 attendees
- High estimate: 400–600 attendees
What matters here is not raw volume alone. The commercial value comes from concentration of credible education professionals, faculty leaders, research presenters, and institutional stakeholders. In other words, lower footfall can still mean strong relevance if the audience matches your client category closely.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Typical subject areas at ICETL usually include:
- Teaching methodology and classroom innovation
- Curriculum design and development
- Learning sciences and pedagogy
- Digital learning and online education
- Assessment and evaluation methods
- Teacher education and professional development
- Inclusive education and accessibility
- Educational leadership and policy
- Student engagement and learning outcomes
- Research methods in education
- Cross-cultural and comparative education studies
- Technology-enhanced learning
Best buyer engagement angles
Since this is a research and education community event, the strongest messaging is not broad commercial outreach. The more effective angle is to position the audience in terms of institutional influence, academic credibility, and teaching innovation relevance.
Examples of strong positioning include:
- University teaching and learning leadership
- Faculty development and curriculum strategy professionals
- Research-active educators and academic department heads
- Assessment, pedagogy, and instructional innovation stakeholders
- Institutions and solution providers focused on improving learning outcomes
If your client serves the education ecosystem, this event can be especially relevant for:
- Learning management platforms
- Assessment and testing tools
- Academic publishing and journals
- Faculty training and certification services
- Digital content providers
- Student engagement and classroom participation software
- Research workflow and academic analytics tools
- Language learning and international education services
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
To refine this event properly against your exact commercial objective, we would need your client website first. Once we review the client website, we can identify which attendee and organization segments are the best fit based on the client’s product, positioning, pricing level, and target market.
Please share the client website, and we will review it and tell you:
- Which buyer categories are the best match for ICETL
- Which job titles should be prioritized first
- Which industries should be included or excluded
- Whether universities, publishers, edtech firms, research groups, or training providers are the strongest fit
- Which sample companies should move to top priority based on your client solution
For example:
- If the client sells LMS, digital classroom, or online learning tools, we would prioritize directors of online learning, teaching and learning leaders, instructional design heads, and higher education institutions.
- If the client sells academic publishing, journals, or research dissemination services, we would prioritize editors, publishing directors, faculty researchers, and university departments.
- If the client sells assessment or testing solutions, we would prioritize assessment leaders, academic affairs teams, credentialing bodies, and institutions with formal evaluation needs.
- If the client sells teacher training, certification, or faculty development solutions, we would prioritize deans, faculty development directors, teacher education departments, and professional learning organizations.
- If the client sells classroom engagement or student success tools, we would prioritize pedagogy-focused faculty, department heads, student success leaders, and education innovation teams.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
Overall quality rating for professional education-focused outreach: 7.5/10
This is a good event when the client aligns with higher education, pedagogy, academic research, teacher development, assessment, digital learning, publishing, or institutional partnerships. It is not the right event for every category, because it is specialized, academic, and likely smaller in footfall than large commercial exhibitions. However, the audience quality can be very strong when the client serves education professionals directly.
Best segments to prioritize:
- Universities and colleges
- Schools of education and teacher training institutions
- Academic publishing houses
- Assessment and learning technology providers
- Faculty development and professional training organizations
- Research and education-focused nonprofits and associations
Best use case for this event:
ICETL is most valuable for reaching academic decision-makers, faculty leaders, education researchers, and institutional innovation stakeholders. If your client website is shared with us, we can narrow this further and produce the most relevant buyer universe, best titles, strongest industries, and top-priority sample accounts specifically matched to the client offering.
Data sheet
| Event Name | 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) |
| Event Date | Publicly available date requires verification |
| Event Status | Not conclusively verified from the provided details |
| Venue | Hotel Haven |
| City | Helsinki |
| State / Region | Uusimaa |
| Country | Finland |
| Organizer | Official organizer name requires verification from the event website |
| Official Event Website | Requires verification |
| Event Type | International academic conference |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | Science & Research; IT & Technology |
| Audience Reach | International academic and institutional reach is likely, subject to official confirmation |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Low for numeric attendance until official agenda, registration, or brochure is verified |
| Main Purpose of Event | Research presentation, academic networking, teaching-method exchange, institutional collaboration, and education-sector partnership development |
The 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) is positioned as an academic and professional forum focused on education research, pedagogical practice, institutional learning strategy, and scholarly exchange. Based on the event title and venue details provided, the conference is relevant to universities, colleges, teacher-training institutions, education researchers, administrators, curriculum specialists, and education technology stakeholders.
From a commercial and lead-generation perspective, the event is most relevant for organizations selling academic technology, digital learning tools, assessment platforms, institutional services, publishing, research support solutions, training programs, and partnership offerings into higher education and education-adjacent institutions. Buyer access is likely stronger for departmental, program, research, and academic leadership roles than for large-scale centralized procurement teams.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| University faculty and researchers | Universities, research institutes, teacher education schools | Influence adoption of research tools, content, platforms, and training services | High for research software, academic publishing, learning platforms, and faculty development |
| Academic leadership | Deans, department heads, rectors, provost offices | Budget influence, strategic approval, institutional partnership decisions | Very high for institutional agreements and pilot programs |
| Teacher training and curriculum specialists | Education faculties, curriculum bodies, pedagogical centers | Evaluate classroom methods, digital learning content, assessment tools | High for instructional design, assessment, and teacher-support offerings |
| Institutional procurement and administration teams | Universities, colleges, public education agencies | Commercial review, vendor onboarding, purchasing compliance | Medium to high where solutions require institutional purchase |
| Education technology leaders | IT departments, digital learning offices, LMS teams | Technical evaluation, integration, data security and deployment influence | High for SaaS, LMS, classroom technology, analytics, and AI tools |
| Government and education agency representatives | Education ministries, local education departments, national agencies | Policy influence, grants, program partnerships, public-sector procurement pathways | High for public education solutions and funded initiatives |
| Academic publishers and content partners | Publishing houses, journals, content aggregators | Content selection, licensing, partnership discussions | Medium for content, journal, and database sales |
| Consultants and training providers | Professional development firms, instructional consultants | Partnership buying, referral influence, pilot program design | Medium for channel partnerships and co-delivery models |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helsinki | Local academics, administrators, public-sector education stakeholders | High | Strong university and policy ecosystem; practical source of institutional attendees |
| Uusimaa region | Nearby higher education institutions and education service organizations | High | Includes the wider capital-area academic and innovation network |
| Other Finnish cities | National university, college, and training institution delegates | Medium to high | Likely if the program includes publication, speaking, and research collaboration value |
| Nordics and Baltic region | Cross-border faculty, research presenters, institutional partners | Medium | Helsinki is accessible for regional academic travel and collaboration |
| Broader Europe | International presenters and education researchers | Medium | Likely if the conference positions itself as an international publication and networking forum |
| Global academic market | Researchers, doctoral candidates, and education-sector professionals | Low to medium | International draw depends on accepted-paper pipeline and conference reputation |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Likely primary classification | The event title explicitly uses “International Conference,” indicating cross-border academic participation intent. Actual global attendance should be confirmed through official agenda, speaker list, or accepted-paper roster. |
| Secondary Reach Description | European / Nordic concentration likely | Venue location in Helsinki suggests strong regional accessibility for Nordic and European delegates. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Helsinki | Higher education institution | Major Helsinki-based research university aligned with education research and conference themes | helsinki.fi | Dean, Professor of Education, Director of Learning Services, Procurement Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Aalto University | Higher education institution | Nearby institution with teaching innovation and digital learning relevance | aalto.fi | Director of Education, Learning Technology Lead, Research Services Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Metropolia University of Applied Sciences | Applied sciences institution | Relevant for pedagogy, curriculum delivery, workforce training, and edtech pilots | metropolia.fi | Head of Degree Program, Pedagogical Development Manager, IT Director | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences | Applied sciences institution | Likely interest in teaching methods, applied learning, and institutional development | haaga-helia.fi | Vice Rector, Director of Digital Learning, Procurement Specialist | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Laurea University of Applied Sciences | Applied sciences institution | Relevant for faculty development, digital education tools, and student learning solutions | laurea.fi | Director of Education, Head of Learning Services, Program Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Jyväskylä | Higher education institution | Known national relevance in education and teacher training fields | jyu.fi | Professor, Dean, Research Director, Educational Technology Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Tampere University | Higher education institution | Potential buyer for research, teaching innovation, and digital learning services | tuni.fi | Dean, Director of Academic Affairs, CIO, Procurement Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Turku | Higher education institution | Relevant for research collaboration, faculty development, and educational services | utu.fi | Head of Department, Professor, Director of Education, Research Services Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Finnish National Agency for Education | Government education agency | Important public-sector stakeholder for policy, programs, and institutional guidance | oph.fi | Program Director, Education Specialist, Procurement Officer, Policy Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| City of Helsinki, Education Division | Municipal education authority | Relevant for public education partnerships, pilot initiatives, and training services | hel.fi | Education Director, Development Manager, Procurement Specialist, ICT Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dean / Vice Rector / Provost | Academic Leadership | C-Level / VP / Executive | Owns strategic direction, institutional partnerships, and budget influence |
| 2 | Director of Education / Academic Affairs Director | Education Administration | Director | Drives teaching quality, curriculum, and program improvements |
| 3 | Professor / Associate Professor / Research Lead | Faculty / Research | Senior / Manager | Key influencers for research tools, scholarly platforms, and training adoption |
| 4 | Director of Digital Learning / Learning Technology Lead | IT / Digital Learning | Director / Manager | Critical for implementation, platform adoption, integration, and scalability |
| 5 | Procurement Manager / Purchasing Specialist | Procurement | Manager | Handles vendor review, pricing, and contract processes |
| 6 | Program Manager / Pedagogical Development Manager | Programs / Faculty Development | Manager | Owns pilot programs, teacher support, and practical delivery needs |
| 7 | CIO / IT Director | Information Technology | Director / C-Level | Important when solutions involve infrastructure, data, security, or enterprise systems |
| 8 | Education Policy Lead / Agency Program Director | Government / Public Programs | Director / Senior | Relevant for grants, public partnerships, and broad implementation pathways |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higher Education | Core institutional audience fit | Universities, colleges, research-led teaching organizations |
| 2 | Education Management | Fits education administrators and school system decision-makers | Institutional services, policy, administration, and academic operations |
| 3 | E-Learning | Direct fit for digital pedagogy and online teaching solutions | Learning platforms, course tools, hybrid education delivery |
| 4 | Information Technology & Services | Relevant for edtech providers and integration partners | Campus systems, identity, analytics, integrations |
| 5 | Computer Software | Useful for SaaS learning, assessment, and academic workflow vendors | LMS, assessment, student engagement, research tools |
| 6 | Research | Strong fit for institutes and education research bodies | Research collaborations, data services, survey tools |
| 7 | Government Administration | Applicable for education ministries and public education departments | Public-sector programs, tenders, and funded initiatives |
| 8 | Professional Training & Coaching | Relevant for faculty development and educator upskilling vendors | Train-the-trainer and capacity-building programs |
| 9 | Publishing | Academic content and journal ecosystem relevance | Content licensing, scholarly communication, textbooks |
| 10 | Nonprofit Organization Management | Useful for educational NGOs, foundations, and grant-linked programs | Partnership programs, teacher initiatives, community learning |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer | Unconfirmed | Official attendee count not available from provided details | A formal brochure, registration page, or press release is needed for verification |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Academic conferences often do not publish exhibitor-style counts | Commercial sponsorship may be limited versus trade shows |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official buyer program identified from provided details | The event is better viewed as institutional decision-maker networking than a formal hosted-buyer event |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Agenda or accepted-paper list required | Speaker organizations can be valuable for prospect identification once confirmed |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Sponsorship information not verified | Sponsor page can help identify relevant solution vendors and partners |
| Historical attendance | Historical figure not publicly confirmed | Historical / prior-year evidence unavailable | No verified prior-year numeric source confirmed in this review | Use caution when estimating lead volume |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching methodology | Evidence-based teaching improvement | Workshops, pilots, faculty enablement discussions | Pedagogical tools, training, course design support |
| Education research | Research dissemination, data collection, publication support | Research collaboration and scholarly workflow conversations | Survey platforms, analytics, publication services, repositories |
| Digital learning | Scalable online and hybrid delivery | Product demos and platform evaluation meetings | LMS tools, virtual classrooms, engagement software |
| Assessment and outcomes | Measuring student performance and teaching effectiveness | Evaluation framework discussions with academic leaders | Assessment systems, rubrics, analytics, accreditation support |
| Faculty development | Professional training and educator capability building | Partnerships with teaching centers and administrators | Training programs, coaching, certification, workshops |
| Institutional partnerships | Research networks, co-delivery, international collaboration | Executive and program-level networking | Consortia support, joint programs, academic services |
| Education policy and public programs | Evidence for funded initiatives and system-level improvement | Agency engagement and grant-aligned positioning | Policy research, implementation support, program services |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | High | Strong fit for education, edtech, training, publishing, and academic services vendors |
| Decision-maker availability | Medium | Academic leaders and department influencers are likely; centralized procurement presence may be narrower than at commercial expos |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Quality depends heavily on public speaker, agenda, and paper-author disclosures |
| Apollo targeting potential | High | Education institutions and edtech suppliers can be filtered effectively by industry, title, department, and geography |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Helsinki and the wider Nordic education market provide practical account clustering |
| Best outreach approach | High-value, consultative outreach | Use research, pedagogy, outcomes, and pilot-case framing rather than hard-sell messaging |
| Overall lead quality | Medium to High | Strong if the offer serves higher education, learning technology, faculty support, or academic research operations |
| Best use case | Thought-leadership prospecting and institutional pipeline building | Most useful for B2B education outreach, speaker-led prospecting, and conference-adjacent account mapping |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | Attendance scale, buyer density, and commercial intent are not yet publicly confirmed; not ideal for large-volume attendee list building without official participant data |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Education Management; E-Learning; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Research; Government Administration; Professional Training & Coaching; Publishing | Focus on institutional buyers and relevant education ecosystem vendors |
| Departments | Education, Academic Affairs, Research, Information Technology, Procurement, Operations, Partnerships | Capture both program influencers and budget/control functions |
| Seniority | C-Level; VP; Director; Head; Manager; Senior | Prioritize decision-makers and evaluation leaders |
| Job titles | Dean, Vice Rector, Provost, Director of Education, Academic Affairs Director, Professor, Research Director, Learning Technology Director, CIO, IT Director, Procurement Manager, Program Manager, Head of Faculty Development | Align outreach with academic authority, implementation, and purchasing roles |
| Geography | Finland; Helsinki; Uusimaa; Nordics; Baltics; selected Europe-based education hubs | Replicate the likely attendee footprint around the conference location |
| Employee size | 51-200; 201-500; 501-1,000; 1,001-5,000; 5,001+ | Useful for universities, agencies, and mid-to-large education organizations |
| Keywords | education research, pedagogy, digital learning, curriculum, teaching innovation, faculty development, assessment, learning analytics, higher education, teacher training | Surface organizations and contacts aligned with ICETL themes |
| Technologies, if relevant | LMS, virtual classroom, assessment platform, analytics stack, student information systems | Helps refine digital learning and academic infrastructure accounts |
| Revenue range, if relevant | Use selectively; public institutions often require employee size and organization type more than revenue | Avoid over-filtering public-sector and university accounts |
| Company type | Educational institution, public agency, nonprofit, research organization, software provider, training provider | Supports both buyer-side targeting and ecosystem partnership mapping |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hotel Haven | Venue website | Venue identity and Helsinki location context | High |
| City of Helsinki | Government / city source | City and public-sector education ecosystem context | High |
| Finnish National Agency for Education | Government agency | National education stakeholder relevance for buyer profiling | High |
| Official ICETL event website | Primary event source | Required to verify event date, organizer, speaker list, and attendance claims | Pending direct verification |
| Institutional websites listed in the buyer table | Organization websites | Existence and relevance of prospect institutions | High for organization identity; not evidence of event attendance |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.