11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL)

📅 09 Jul – 11 Jul 2026 📍 Hotel Haven, Helsinki, Finland 🏢 0 exhibitors 👥 0 attendees

🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list

Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.

🔒 Get my buyer details Free · ~20 seconds

About this event

11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL)

Event type: Academic conference, higher education, teacher development, education research, learning innovation, curriculum, pedagogy, educational technology, international scholarly networking.

Best-fit commercial view: This event is best understood as a research-led education conference rather than a mass-market trade show. The strongest professional value comes from universities, colleges, education institutes, teacher training organizations, academic publishers, education technology providers, assessment companies, research organizations, and professional development institutions that want to engage education decision-makers, faculty leaders, and research-active professionals.

1️⃣ Who attends: buyers / attendees

The attendee mix at ICETL is usually centered on the global education and academic community. Unlike a pure expo where procurement teams dominate, this conference tends to attract intellectual, programmatic, institutional, and partnership-oriented audiences. That means the best professional targets are often academic and administrative decision-makers rather than conventional purchasing managers.

Main attendee groups typically include:

  • University professors, lecturers, assistant professors, associate professors, and academic researchers in education and related disciplines
  • Deans, associate deans, heads of department, program directors, curriculum leaders, and faculty administrators
  • Teacher educators, instructional designers, education consultants, and pedagogical specialists
  • School leaders, principals, vice principals, academic coordinators, and teacher training heads
  • Researchers in teaching methods, learning sciences, curriculum design, inclusive education, educational psychology, and digital learning
  • Representatives from colleges, teacher training institutes, research centers, think tanks, and nonprofit education organizations
  • Education technology companies, learning platform providers, assessment firms, academic publishing groups, and professional development vendors
  • Graduate students, doctoral researchers, postdoctoral scholars, and early-career academics presenting research
  • Policy researchers, education associations, quality assurance bodies, and international academic collaboration teams

From a business-fit perspective, the highest-value audience segments are usually:

  • Deans and academic directors who influence institutional partnerships and program adoption
  • Directors of teaching and learning who evaluate instructional models and faculty development tools
  • Curriculum leaders and instructional design heads who shape course delivery and learning outcomes
  • Professional development managers and teacher training coordinators responsible for educator upskilling
  • Education technology leaders exploring tools for digital teaching, assessment, engagement, or analytics
  • Academic publishers and research solution providers seeking scholarly and institutional relationships

2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin

ICETL is typically organized as an international academic conference and may rotate by city and country depending on the edition. For the 11th edition, the exact venue, host city, and dates should be confirmed from the official event website before final campaign planning. The reason this matters is that geography affects not only travel patterns but also the buyer density by institution type, language profile, and regional education priorities.

Even when hosted in one physical destination, the conference generally attracts attendees from multiple regions because education research conferences often pull abstract submitters, speakers, and delegates from:

  • Europe
  • North America
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Selected Latin American institutions

Typical geographic origin of attendees includes:

  • Faculty and researchers from international universities
  • Teacher education colleges and pedagogical institutes
  • Independent scholars and education consultants
  • Regional education associations and policy bodies
  • Cross-border academic collaboration teams

If the event is hosted in Europe, we would normally expect a stronger European attendee share with international delegates joining from Asia, the Middle East, North America, and Africa. If hosted in Asia or the Middle East, we would usually expect stronger regional participation from nearby university networks combined with a core international research audience.

3️⃣ Audience reach

Reach type: International / global academic audience with regional concentration based on venue.

This conference has stronger global relevance than a purely local teacher workshop because research conferences in education attract abstract submissions, paper presentations, panel discussions, and scholarly participation across borders. However, it is important to frame the reach correctly:

  • It is not a mass-consumer education event
  • It is not primarily a K-12 parent audience event
  • It is not a general public expo
  • It is a focused academic and professional education ecosystem event

So the best audience classification is:

  • Global in brand and academic participation
  • International in delegate composition
  • Professionally niche in subject matter
  • High relevance for institutional and scholarly engagement

4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites

Below is a strong sample account list of organizations that align well with an education, teaching, learning, research, faculty development, curriculum, assessment, or academic innovation conference. Since this event is academically oriented, the most suitable account universe includes universities, publishers, edtech firms, teacher training providers, assessment organizations, and academic services companies.

Priority Company Website Best Title to Target Why This is a Good Buyer Fit
1 Pearson https://www.pearson.com Director of Higher Education Partnerships Strong fit for higher education learning content, assessment solutions, digital courseware, and institutional teaching support.
2 McGraw Hill https://www.mheducation.com Senior Manager, Academic Partnerships Relevant for curriculum, digital learning resources, course materials, and faculty-facing engagement in teaching and learning environments.
3 Cengage Group https://www.cengagegroup.com Director, Institutional Partnerships Well aligned with higher education faculty, learning design, classroom technology, and student success solutions.
4 Instructure https://www.instructure.com Regional Director, Higher Education Excellent fit for learning management systems, digital pedagogy, assessment workflows, and faculty enablement.
5 Blackboard https://www.blackboard.com Director of Academic Solutions Strong fit for online learning, virtual teaching environments, course administration, and institutional digital transformation.
6 Turnitin https://www.turnitin.com Director, Institutional Sales Highly relevant for academic integrity, writing assessment, feedback systems, and university teaching practices.
7 Coursera https://www.coursera.org Partnerships Director, Campus Good fit for digital education, online course delivery, workforce-oriented learning, and institutional partnerships.
8 edX https://www.edx.org Director of University Partnerships Aligned with online education, credentialing, course innovation, and global academic collaboration.
9 Wiley https://www.wiley.com Publishing Director, Education Research Strong fit for scholarly publishing, education journals, research dissemination, and faculty engagement.
10 Springer Nature https://www.springernature.com Senior Editor, Education Relevant for conference-oriented research communities, journal ecosystems, and academic publishing partnerships.
11 Elsevier https://www.elsevier.com Director, Academic and Government Solutions Strong buyer fit for research workflows, academic analytics, scholarly content, and university engagement.
12 Kahoot! https://www.kahoot.com Head of Education Partnerships Good fit for classroom engagement, active learning, faculty innovation, and learner participation tools.
13 Quizizz https://www.quizizz.com Director of Institutional Growth Relevant for formative assessment, interactive learning, student engagement, and digital instruction support.
14 Duolingo English Test https://www.englishtest.duolingo.com University Relations Director Useful fit where institutions discuss assessment, admissions, language learning, and international student evaluation.
15 ETS https://www.ets.org Director of Higher Education Solutions Highly relevant for assessment, learning measurement, teacher certification, and education research applications.
16 Cambridge University Press & Assessment https://www.cambridge.org Regional Partnerships Manager Strong fit for academic publishing, English language learning, educational assessment, and institutional reach.
17 Oxford University Press https://global.oup.com Education Partnerships Manager Relevant for scholarly publishing, teaching resources, language education, and academic audience engagement.
18 Anthology https://www.anthology.com Vice President, Higher Education Strategy Strong fit for academic operations, learning platforms, student engagement, and institutional technology strategy.

Top sample accounts to prioritize first: Pearson, Instructure, Turnitin, ETS, Wiley, Springer Nature, Coursera, and Cambridge University Press & Assessment. These represent a balanced mix of higher education solutions, learning platforms, assessment, publishing, and institutional engagement.

5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type

Best job profiles to target

  • Dean, School of Education
  • Associate Dean, Academic Affairs
  • Head of Department, Education
  • Director of Teaching and Learning
  • Director of Curriculum and Instruction
  • Instructional Design Director
  • Director of Faculty Development
  • Academic Program Director
  • Director of Online Learning
  • Director of Educational Technology
  • University Partnerships Director
  • Institutional Sales Director
  • Assessment Solutions Director
  • Research Director
  • Editor, Education Research
  • Publishing Director
  • Teacher Training Manager
  • Professional Development Director
  • Academic Innovation Lead
  • Student Success Director

Best industry filters to use

  • Education Management
  • Higher Education
  • Primary/Secondary Education
  • E-Learning
  • Professional Training & Coaching
  • Information Technology & Services
  • Computer Software
  • Publishing
  • Research
  • Nonprofit Organization Management
  • Information Services
  • Market Research

Event type classification

  • International academic conference
  • Research presentation and publication-oriented event
  • Higher education and pedagogy-focused gathering
  • Faculty, researcher, and institutional networking platform
  • Suitable for partnership-led outreach more than general-volume product promotion

6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected total footfall

Because this is a specialist academic conference, expected attendance is usually far smaller than a major commercial trade fair. The likely footfall range for a focused international education research event of this nature is generally in the 150 to 600 attendee range, depending on host city, accessibility, paper acceptance volume, hybrid participation options, and organizer strength.

A practical working estimate would be:

  • Conservative estimate: 150–250 attendees
  • Moderate estimate: 250–400 attendees
  • High estimate: 400–600 attendees

What matters here is not raw volume alone. The commercial value comes from concentration of credible education professionals, faculty leaders, research presenters, and institutional stakeholders. In other words, lower footfall can still mean strong relevance if the audience matches your client category closely.

7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement

Typical subject areas at ICETL usually include:

  • Teaching methodology and classroom innovation
  • Curriculum design and development
  • Learning sciences and pedagogy
  • Digital learning and online education
  • Assessment and evaluation methods
  • Teacher education and professional development
  • Inclusive education and accessibility
  • Educational leadership and policy
  • Student engagement and learning outcomes
  • Research methods in education
  • Cross-cultural and comparative education studies
  • Technology-enhanced learning

Best buyer engagement angles

Since this is a research and education community event, the strongest messaging is not broad commercial outreach. The more effective angle is to position the audience in terms of institutional influence, academic credibility, and teaching innovation relevance.

Examples of strong positioning include:

  • University teaching and learning leadership
  • Faculty development and curriculum strategy professionals
  • Research-active educators and academic department heads
  • Assessment, pedagogy, and instructional innovation stakeholders
  • Institutions and solution providers focused on improving learning outcomes

If your client serves the education ecosystem, this event can be especially relevant for:

  • Learning management platforms
  • Assessment and testing tools
  • Academic publishing and journals
  • Faculty training and certification services
  • Digital content providers
  • Student engagement and classroom participation software
  • Research workflow and academic analytics tools
  • Language learning and international education services

8️⃣ Client-product fit note

To refine this event properly against your exact commercial objective, we would need your client website first. Once we review the client website, we can identify which attendee and organization segments are the best fit based on the client’s product, positioning, pricing level, and target market.

Please share the client website, and we will review it and tell you:

  • Which buyer categories are the best match for ICETL
  • Which job titles should be prioritized first
  • Which industries should be included or excluded
  • Whether universities, publishers, edtech firms, research groups, or training providers are the strongest fit
  • Which sample companies should move to top priority based on your client solution

For example:

  • If the client sells LMS, digital classroom, or online learning tools, we would prioritize directors of online learning, teaching and learning leaders, instructional design heads, and higher education institutions.
  • If the client sells academic publishing, journals, or research dissemination services, we would prioritize editors, publishing directors, faculty researchers, and university departments.
  • If the client sells assessment or testing solutions, we would prioritize assessment leaders, academic affairs teams, credentialing bodies, and institutions with formal evaluation needs.
  • If the client sells teacher training, certification, or faculty development solutions, we would prioritize deans, faculty development directors, teacher education departments, and professional learning organizations.
  • If the client sells classroom engagement or student success tools, we would prioritize pedagogy-focused faculty, department heads, student success leaders, and education innovation teams.

9️⃣ Final recommendation

Overall quality rating for professional education-focused outreach: 7.5/10

This is a good event when the client aligns with higher education, pedagogy, academic research, teacher development, assessment, digital learning, publishing, or institutional partnerships. It is not the right event for every category, because it is specialized, academic, and likely smaller in footfall than large commercial exhibitions. However, the audience quality can be very strong when the client serves education professionals directly.

Best segments to prioritize:

  • Universities and colleges
  • Schools of education and teacher training institutions
  • Academic publishing houses
  • Assessment and learning technology providers
  • Faculty development and professional training organizations
  • Research and education-focused nonprofits and associations

Best use case for this event:

ICETL is most valuable for reaching academic decision-makers, faculty leaders, education researchers, and institutional innovation stakeholders. If your client website is shared with us, we can narrow this further and produce the most relevant buyer universe, best titles, strongest industries, and top-priority sample accounts specifically matched to the client offering.

Data sheet

11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) – Event Attendee & Buyer Profile Analysis
Event date: Publicly available date requires verification
Location: Hotel Haven, Helsinki, Finland
Event status: Verification required
Research date: June 27, 2026
Event Overview
Event Name 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL)
Event Date Publicly available date requires verification
Event Status Not conclusively verified from the provided details
Venue Hotel Haven
City Helsinki
State / Region Uusimaa
Country Finland
Organizer Official organizer name requires verification from the event website
Official Event Website Requires verification
Event Type International academic conference
Primary Category Education & Training
Secondary Applicable Categories Science & Research; IT & Technology
Audience Reach International academic and institutional reach is likely, subject to official confirmation
Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer
Attendance Data Reliability Low for numeric attendance until official agenda, registration, or brochure is verified
Main Purpose of Event Research presentation, academic networking, teaching-method exchange, institutional collaboration, and education-sector partnership development
About the Event

The 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) is positioned as an academic and professional forum focused on education research, pedagogical practice, institutional learning strategy, and scholarly exchange. Based on the event title and venue details provided, the conference is relevant to universities, colleges, teacher-training institutions, education researchers, administrators, curriculum specialists, and education technology stakeholders.

From a commercial and lead-generation perspective, the event is most relevant for organizations selling academic technology, digital learning tools, assessment platforms, institutional services, publishing, research support solutions, training programs, and partnership offerings into higher education and education-adjacent institutions. Buyer access is likely stronger for departmental, program, research, and academic leadership roles than for large-scale centralized procurement teams.

1. Who Attends: Buyers / Attendees
Buyer / Attendee Segment Typical Organizations Buying Role or Influence Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers
University faculty and researchers Universities, research institutes, teacher education schools Influence adoption of research tools, content, platforms, and training services High for research software, academic publishing, learning platforms, and faculty development
Academic leadership Deans, department heads, rectors, provost offices Budget influence, strategic approval, institutional partnership decisions Very high for institutional agreements and pilot programs
Teacher training and curriculum specialists Education faculties, curriculum bodies, pedagogical centers Evaluate classroom methods, digital learning content, assessment tools High for instructional design, assessment, and teacher-support offerings
Institutional procurement and administration teams Universities, colleges, public education agencies Commercial review, vendor onboarding, purchasing compliance Medium to high where solutions require institutional purchase
Education technology leaders IT departments, digital learning offices, LMS teams Technical evaluation, integration, data security and deployment influence High for SaaS, LMS, classroom technology, analytics, and AI tools
Government and education agency representatives Education ministries, local education departments, national agencies Policy influence, grants, program partnerships, public-sector procurement pathways High for public education solutions and funded initiatives
Academic publishers and content partners Publishing houses, journals, content aggregators Content selection, licensing, partnership discussions Medium for content, journal, and database sales
Consultants and training providers Professional development firms, instructional consultants Partnership buying, referral influence, pilot program design Medium for channel partnerships and co-delivery models
2. Event Location and Attendee Geographic Origin
Geographic Area Likely Attendee Origin Buyer Concentration Notes
Helsinki Local academics, administrators, public-sector education stakeholders High Strong university and policy ecosystem; practical source of institutional attendees
Uusimaa region Nearby higher education institutions and education service organizations High Includes the wider capital-area academic and innovation network
Other Finnish cities National university, college, and training institution delegates Medium to high Likely if the program includes publication, speaking, and research collaboration value
Nordics and Baltic region Cross-border faculty, research presenters, institutional partners Medium Helsinki is accessible for regional academic travel and collaboration
Broader Europe International presenters and education researchers Medium Likely if the conference positions itself as an international publication and networking forum
Global academic market Researchers, doctoral candidates, and education-sector professionals Low to medium International draw depends on accepted-paper pipeline and conference reputation
3. Audience Reach
Reach Level Assessment Explanation
Global Likely primary classification The event title explicitly uses “International Conference,” indicating cross-border academic participation intent. Actual global attendance should be confirmed through official agenda, speaker list, or accepted-paper roster.
Secondary Reach Description European / Nordic concentration likely Venue location in Helsinki suggests strong regional accessibility for Nordic and European delegates.
4. Sample Buyer Companies and Websites
No official current-year attendee, buyer, or sponsor list was publicly confirmed from the provided event details. The organizations below are high-relevance education-sector prospect targets for outreach around this event theme and Helsinki location. They should not be treated as confirmed attendees.
Buyer Company / Organization Buyer Type Why It Is Relevant Website Best Job Titles to Target Evidence Level
University of Helsinki Higher education institution Major Helsinki-based research university aligned with education research and conference themes helsinki.fi Dean, Professor of Education, Director of Learning Services, Procurement Manager Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
Aalto University Higher education institution Nearby institution with teaching innovation and digital learning relevance aalto.fi Director of Education, Learning Technology Lead, Research Services Director Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Applied sciences institution Relevant for pedagogy, curriculum delivery, workforce training, and edtech pilots metropolia.fi Head of Degree Program, Pedagogical Development Manager, IT Director Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences Applied sciences institution Likely interest in teaching methods, applied learning, and institutional development haaga-helia.fi Vice Rector, Director of Digital Learning, Procurement Specialist Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
Laurea University of Applied Sciences Applied sciences institution Relevant for faculty development, digital education tools, and student learning solutions laurea.fi Director of Education, Head of Learning Services, Program Manager Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
University of Jyväskylä Higher education institution Known national relevance in education and teacher training fields jyu.fi Professor, Dean, Research Director, Educational Technology Manager Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
Tampere University Higher education institution Potential buyer for research, teaching innovation, and digital learning services tuni.fi Dean, Director of Academic Affairs, CIO, Procurement Manager Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
University of Turku Higher education institution Relevant for research collaboration, faculty development, and educational services utu.fi Head of Department, Professor, Director of Education, Research Services Lead Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
Finnish National Agency for Education Government education agency Important public-sector stakeholder for policy, programs, and institutional guidance oph.fi Program Director, Education Specialist, Procurement Officer, Policy Lead Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
City of Helsinki, Education Division Municipal education authority Relevant for public education partnerships, pilot initiatives, and training services hel.fi Education Director, Development Manager, Procurement Specialist, ICT Manager Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed
5. Job Profiles, Industries and Event Type
Priority Job Title / Function Department Seniority Level Why This Role Matters
1 Dean / Vice Rector / Provost Academic Leadership C-Level / VP / Executive Owns strategic direction, institutional partnerships, and budget influence
2 Director of Education / Academic Affairs Director Education Administration Director Drives teaching quality, curriculum, and program improvements
3 Professor / Associate Professor / Research Lead Faculty / Research Senior / Manager Key influencers for research tools, scholarly platforms, and training adoption
4 Director of Digital Learning / Learning Technology Lead IT / Digital Learning Director / Manager Critical for implementation, platform adoption, integration, and scalability
5 Procurement Manager / Purchasing Specialist Procurement Manager Handles vendor review, pricing, and contract processes
6 Program Manager / Pedagogical Development Manager Programs / Faculty Development Manager Owns pilot programs, teacher support, and practical delivery needs
7 CIO / IT Director Information Technology Director / C-Level Important when solutions involve infrastructure, data, security, or enterprise systems
8 Education Policy Lead / Agency Program Director Government / Public Programs Director / Senior Relevant for grants, public partnerships, and broad implementation pathways
Priority Apollo Industry Why It Fits the Event Best Buyer Use Case
1Higher EducationCore institutional audience fitUniversities, colleges, research-led teaching organizations
2Education ManagementFits education administrators and school system decision-makersInstitutional services, policy, administration, and academic operations
3E-LearningDirect fit for digital pedagogy and online teaching solutionsLearning platforms, course tools, hybrid education delivery
4Information Technology & ServicesRelevant for edtech providers and integration partnersCampus systems, identity, analytics, integrations
5Computer SoftwareUseful for SaaS learning, assessment, and academic workflow vendorsLMS, assessment, student engagement, research tools
6ResearchStrong fit for institutes and education research bodiesResearch collaborations, data services, survey tools
7Government AdministrationApplicable for education ministries and public education departmentsPublic-sector programs, tenders, and funded initiatives
8Professional Training & CoachingRelevant for faculty development and educator upskilling vendorsTrain-the-trainer and capacity-building programs
9PublishingAcademic content and journal ecosystem relevanceContent licensing, scholarly communication, textbooks
10Nonprofit Organization ManagementUseful for educational NGOs, foundations, and grant-linked programsPartnership programs, teacher initiatives, community learning
6. Estimated Attendance
Metric Figure Status Source / Basis Notes
Estimated total footfall Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer Unconfirmed Official attendee count not available from provided details A formal brochure, registration page, or press release is needed for verification
Exhibitor count Not publicly confirmed Unconfirmed Academic conferences often do not publish exhibitor-style counts Commercial sponsorship may be limited versus trade shows
Buyer count Not publicly confirmed Unconfirmed No official buyer program identified from provided details The event is better viewed as institutional decision-maker networking than a formal hosted-buyer event
Speaker count Not publicly confirmed Unconfirmed Agenda or accepted-paper list required Speaker organizations can be valuable for prospect identification once confirmed
Sponsor count Not publicly confirmed Unconfirmed Sponsorship information not verified Sponsor page can help identify relevant solution vendors and partners
Historical attendance Historical figure not publicly confirmed Historical / prior-year evidence unavailable No verified prior-year numeric source confirmed in this review Use caution when estimating lead volume
7. Key Focus Areas and Buyer Engagement
Focus Area Typical Buyer Need Buyer Engagement Opportunity Relevant Supplier Offering
Teaching methodology Evidence-based teaching improvement Workshops, pilots, faculty enablement discussions Pedagogical tools, training, course design support
Education research Research dissemination, data collection, publication support Research collaboration and scholarly workflow conversations Survey platforms, analytics, publication services, repositories
Digital learning Scalable online and hybrid delivery Product demos and platform evaluation meetings LMS tools, virtual classrooms, engagement software
Assessment and outcomes Measuring student performance and teaching effectiveness Evaluation framework discussions with academic leaders Assessment systems, rubrics, analytics, accreditation support
Faculty development Professional training and educator capability building Partnerships with teaching centers and administrators Training programs, coaching, certification, workshops
Institutional partnerships Research networks, co-delivery, international collaboration Executive and program-level networking Consortia support, joint programs, academic services
Education policy and public programs Evidence for funded initiatives and system-level improvement Agency engagement and grant-aligned positioning Policy research, implementation support, program services
Lead Quality Assessment
Factor Assessment Explanation
Buyer relevance High Strong fit for education, edtech, training, publishing, and academic services vendors
Decision-maker availability Medium Academic leaders and department influencers are likely; centralized procurement presence may be narrower than at commercial expos
Data collection potential Medium Quality depends heavily on public speaker, agenda, and paper-author disclosures
Apollo targeting potential High Education institutions and edtech suppliers can be filtered effectively by industry, title, department, and geography
Geographic targeting potential High Helsinki and the wider Nordic education market provide practical account clustering
Best outreach approach High-value, consultative outreach Use research, pedagogy, outcomes, and pilot-case framing rather than hard-sell messaging
Overall lead quality Medium to High Strong if the offer serves higher education, learning technology, faculty support, or academic research operations
Best use case Thought-leadership prospecting and institutional pipeline building Most useful for B2B education outreach, speaker-led prospecting, and conference-adjacent account mapping
Limitations / risks Medium Attendance scale, buyer density, and commercial intent are not yet publicly confirmed; not ideal for large-volume attendee list building without official participant data
Apollo.io Targeting Recommendation
Filter Type Recommended Filters Purpose
Apollo industries Higher Education; Education Management; E-Learning; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Research; Government Administration; Professional Training & Coaching; Publishing Focus on institutional buyers and relevant education ecosystem vendors
Departments Education, Academic Affairs, Research, Information Technology, Procurement, Operations, Partnerships Capture both program influencers and budget/control functions
Seniority C-Level; VP; Director; Head; Manager; Senior Prioritize decision-makers and evaluation leaders
Job titles Dean, Vice Rector, Provost, Director of Education, Academic Affairs Director, Professor, Research Director, Learning Technology Director, CIO, IT Director, Procurement Manager, Program Manager, Head of Faculty Development Align outreach with academic authority, implementation, and purchasing roles
Geography Finland; Helsinki; Uusimaa; Nordics; Baltics; selected Europe-based education hubs Replicate the likely attendee footprint around the conference location
Employee size 51-200; 201-500; 501-1,000; 1,001-5,000; 5,001+ Useful for universities, agencies, and mid-to-large education organizations
Keywords education research, pedagogy, digital learning, curriculum, teaching innovation, faculty development, assessment, learning analytics, higher education, teacher training Surface organizations and contacts aligned with ICETL themes
Technologies, if relevant LMS, virtual classroom, assessment platform, analytics stack, student information systems Helps refine digital learning and academic infrastructure accounts
Revenue range, if relevant Use selectively; public institutions often require employee size and organization type more than revenue Avoid over-filtering public-sector and university accounts
Company type Educational institution, public agency, nonprofit, research organization, software provider, training provider Supports both buyer-side targeting and ecosystem partnership mapping
Suggested Apollo Search Logic: ("higher education" OR university OR college OR "education management" OR "teacher training" OR "digital learning" OR pedagogy OR curriculum OR "learning analytics") AND (Dean OR "Director of Education" OR Professor OR "Academic Affairs" OR "Learning Technology" OR "Procurement Manager" OR CIO OR "Research Director") AND (Finland OR Helsinki OR Uusimaa OR Nordic).
Client Fit Review Required
Please share the client website or product/service details. I will review the client offering and identify the highest-fit buyer companies, Apollo industries, seniority levels, departments, and job titles from this event.
Sources & Verification Notes
Source Type What It Verified Reliability
Hotel Haven Venue website Venue identity and Helsinki location context High
City of Helsinki Government / city source City and public-sector education ecosystem context High
Finnish National Agency for Education Government agency National education stakeholder relevance for buyer profiling High
Official ICETL event website Primary event source Required to verify event date, organizer, speaker list, and attendance claims Pending direct verification
Institutional websites listed in the buyer table Organization websites Existence and relevance of prospect institutions High for organization identity; not evidence of event attendance

🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list

Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on Research in Education, Teaching and Learning (ICETL) — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.

🔒 Get my buyer details Free · ~20 seconds
Chat with us
We usually reply quickly