
11th International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.
About this event
11th International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education
Event type: Education conference, academic research conference, teacher development forum, higher education and learning innovation event
Date: Please confirm the exact dates of the 11th edition on the official event website before outreach
Venue: Please confirm the exact city and venue for the 11th edition on the official event website before final targeting
Estimated attendance: Typically a focused international academic audience, often in the range of 150–350 attendees depending on host city, hybrid participation, and co-located workshops
This conference is best understood as a specialized international education event rather than a mass-market expo. The audience usually includes university faculty, researchers, teacher educators, academic administrators, instructional designers, education consultants, school leaders, and education-technology stakeholders who are actively involved in teaching innovation, curriculum improvement, digital learning, pedagogy research, and institutional development.
1️⃣ Who attends: Buyers / attendees
The attendee profile for this conference is strongly centered around the teaching, learning, and academic innovation ecosystem. The best buyer profiles are usually not procurement-only contacts. The strongest fit comes from decision-makers and influencers who shape learning strategy, digital teaching tools, faculty development, assessment methods, curriculum design, and institutional partnerships.
Main attendee groups usually include:
- University professors, lecturers, and academic researchers in education
- Deans, vice deans, and department heads from schools of education
- Directors of teaching and learning centers
- Instructional designers and e-learning leaders
- Teacher training institutes and faculty development teams
- K-12 school leaders, principals, and curriculum heads
- Education consultants and training organizations
- Education-technology companies serving schools and universities
- Government and policy stakeholders involved in education reform
- Nonprofit and international organizations working in learning access, pedagogy, and educator development
Best buyer-style attendee segments:
- Directors of Teaching & Learning
- Heads of E-Learning or Digital Education
- Deans of Education
- Academic Affairs leaders
- Curriculum Development Managers
- Faculty Development Directors
- Learning Innovation Managers
- Teacher Training Program Directors
- Academic Technology leaders
- Partnerships and institutional outreach teams in education suppliers
This is a strong event for reaching people who influence teaching methods, digital learning adoption, research collaborations, certification programs, faculty training, and education tools evaluation.
2️⃣ Where the show is happening + attendee geographic origin
The exact host city and venue for the 11th edition should be confirmed from the official event site, because international academic conferences often rotate across major education and conference destinations. These events are commonly held in European conference cities or internationally accessible academic hubs.
Attendee geographic origin is usually:
- International faculty and researchers from Europe
- Academic delegates from the Middle East and Asia
- Selected participants from North America, Africa, and Latin America
- Local and regional university communities from the host country
- Remote or hybrid participants if virtual paper presentation options are available
Best geographic targeting:
- Universities and colleges in the host country and surrounding region
- International institutions with schools of education or strong teaching innovation programs
- Edtech firms with international higher education clients
- Teacher training institutes and continuing professional development providers
- Associations, accreditation groups, and education nonprofits operating cross-border
3️⃣ Audience reach
Reach type: International niche audience with strong academic depth
This is not a local-only event. Even if the in-person footfall is modest compared with large expos, the conference typically has global intellectual reach because papers, speaker participation, institutional affiliations, and collaborations often span multiple countries. In practical business terms, this means the event has:
- Local reach through host-country educators and institutions
- Regional reach through nearby universities, training centers, and ministries
- Global reach through international presenters, research authors, and teaching innovation professionals
For outreach quality, this is usually best classified as an international education decision-maker and influencer event rather than a broad public conference.
4️⃣ Sample buyer company names + websites
Below is a sample set of strong buyer-style accounts that fit this event well. These include universities, online learning providers, educational technology companies, and training-focused institutions that have a clear connection to teaching innovation, higher education strategy, curriculum, or faculty development.
| Priority | Company | Website | Best Title to Target | Why This is a Good Buyer Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coursera | https://www.coursera.org | Director of University Partnerships | Strong fit because the company works directly with universities, online learning strategy, course delivery, and digital education expansion. |
| 2 | Instructure | https://www.instructure.com | Regional Director, Higher Education | Excellent fit for learning management, faculty adoption, digital classroom systems, and institutional teaching outcomes. |
| 3 | Blackboard | https://www.blackboard.com | Higher Education Account Director | Relevant because teaching and education conferences attract institutions evaluating learning platforms and student engagement tools. |
| 4 | D2L | https://www.d2l.com | Director, Academic Partnerships | Strong alignment with digital pedagogy, instructional design, and modern teaching delivery in universities and colleges. |
| 5 | Pearson | https://www.pearson.com | Director of Institutional Partnerships | Strong fit for higher education solutions, assessments, learning content, and academic transformation programs. |
| 6 | McGraw Hill | https://www.mheducation.com | Higher Education Partnerships Manager | Good fit because the audience includes teaching leaders, curriculum stakeholders, and institutions seeking updated learning resources. |
| 7 | Cambridge University Press & Assessment | https://www.cambridge.org | Education Partnerships Manager | Strong buyer fit for pedagogy, assessment, educator resources, and institutional academic collaboration. |
| 8 | Oxford University Press | https://global.oup.com | Institutional Sales Manager | Relevant for academic publishing, learning materials, language education, and faculty-focused teaching support. |
| 9 | Kahoot! | https://kahoot.com | Head of Higher Education Sales | Very strong fit for classroom engagement, digital pedagogy, and active-learning innovation discussions. |
| 10 | Mentimeter | https://www.mentimeter.com | Education Partnerships Lead | Good fit because conference delegates often seek interactive teaching tools that improve live and hybrid participation. |
| 11 | Canvas by Instructure | https://www.canvaslms.com | Director of Educational Success | Strong relevance to institutions reviewing classroom technology, learning experience, and course management systems. |
| 12 | edX | https://www.edx.org | University Partnerships Manager | Good fit for open learning, digital transformation, online programs, and institutional course strategy. |
| 13 | Open University | https://www.open.ac.uk | Director of Learning Innovation | Highly relevant because the institution is deeply connected with distance learning, pedagogy, and educator development. |
| 14 | Arizona State University | https://www.asu.edu | Executive Director, Teaching and Learning Innovation | Strong fit due to its global reputation for innovation in education, online learning, and academic transformation. |
| 15 | University of London | https://www.london.ac.uk | Head of Digital Education | Good buyer fit for international education models, online delivery, and cross-border teaching programs. |
| 16 | FutureLearn | https://www.futurelearn.com | Partnerships Director | Relevant because the conference attracts institutions interested in new teaching methods and online learning pathways. |
| 17 | Duolingo English Test | https://englishtest.duolingo.com | Director of Institutional Partnerships | Strong fit where international education, assessment innovation, and learner access are key themes. |
| 18 | Google for Education | https://edu.google.com | Education Program Manager | Very strong fit for classroom technology, collaboration tools, teacher productivity, and digital pedagogy. |
Top buyer samples to prioritize first: Coursera, Instructure, Pearson, D2L, Google for Education, Arizona State University, Open University, Kahoot!, FutureLearn, and Blackboard. This mix gives strong coverage across higher education institutions, digital learning platforms, and teaching innovation providers.
5️⃣ Job profiles, industries & event type
Best job profiles to target
- Director of Teaching and Learning
- Dean of Education
- Vice President, Academic Affairs
- Head of E-Learning
- Director of Digital Education
- Instructional Design Manager
- Faculty Development Director
- Curriculum Director
- Academic Technology Director
- Teacher Training Program Manager
- Director of Learning Innovation
- Education Partnerships Manager
- Research Program Director
- Higher Education Sales Director
- Institutional Partnerships Lead
- Assessment and Learning Solutions Director
Best industry filters to use
Based on the industry list provided, the strongest industries for this conference are:
- Education Management
- Higher Education
- Primary/Secondary Education
- E-Learning
- Information Technology & Services
- Computer Software
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Nonprofit Organization Management
- Government Administration
- International Affairs
- Publishing
Industry priority suggestion
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- E-Learning
- Primary/Secondary Education
- Computer Software
- Information Technology & Services
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Publishing
- Nonprofit Organization Management
Event type classification
- Academic conference
- Education innovation conference
- Teacher development event
- Higher education strategy event
- Research presentation and networking event
6️⃣ Estimated attendance / expected total footfall
For a conference of this type, a practical estimate is 150–350 total attendees, with some editions possibly lower or higher depending on:
- Host city accessibility
- Visa convenience
- Hybrid participation options
- Strength of speaker lineup
- Co-located workshops or paper presentation tracks
- Institutional travel budgets
Attendee composition usually includes:
- Academic presenters and authors
- Faculty and lecturers
- Institutional administrators
- Graduate researchers and doctoral participants
- Education solution providers
- Policy and nonprofit representatives
This means the overall footfall may be smaller than large commercial expos, but the buyer quality can be high because many participants are specialized professionals with direct influence over pedagogy, faculty support, educational tools, and program design.
7️⃣ Key focus areas & buyer engagement
Likely key focus areas
- New teaching methodologies
- Digital learning and blended education
- Curriculum innovation
- Assessment and learning outcomes
- Teacher professional development
- Higher education transformation
- Student engagement strategies
- Inclusive and accessible education
- Online learning design
- Research in pedagogy and educational effectiveness
- Classroom technology adoption
- Internationalization of education
Best buyer engagement angle
The strongest positioning for this event is around reaching:
- Teaching and learning decision-makers
- Faculty development leaders
- Digital education heads
- Curriculum and pedagogy stakeholders
- University partnerships teams
- Education innovation professionals
Compared with broad education expos, this conference is especially valuable for organizations that need a targeted education leadership and innovation audience rather than general classroom traffic.
8️⃣ Client-product fit note
To refine the best buyer targets properly, we should first review your client’s website. Once we review the product, service, solution category, pricing position, and ideal customer type, we can identify the most relevant buyer groups from this conference with much higher accuracy.
Please share the client website, and we will review it and identify the best-fit buyers based on the client requirement.
How buyer fit changes by client type:
- If the client sells LMS, virtual learning, assessment, or classroom software, we should prioritize heads of e-learning, digital education directors, academic technology leaders, and university learning strategy teams.
- If the client sells teacher training, certification, workshops, or professional development services, we should prioritize deans, faculty development directors, school leaders, and training institute managers.
- If the client sells academic publishing, content libraries, curriculum resources, or assessment tools, we should prioritize curriculum heads, institutional partnerships leaders, deans, and academic affairs teams.
- If the client sells student engagement tools, classroom participation platforms, or AI learning support products, we should prioritize instructional design leaders, teaching innovation centers, and digital pedagogy teams.
- If the client serves government, nonprofit, or international education programs, we should prioritize ministries, cross-border education projects, research institutions, and learning access organizations.
9️⃣ Final recommendation
Overall assessment: This is a strong event for reaching a high-quality international education audience, especially where the client solution is connected to higher education, teacher development, pedagogy, online learning, curriculum, assessment, or institutional innovation.
Best buyer segments to collect and prioritize:
- Universities and colleges
- Schools of education
- Teaching and learning centers
- Instructional design and e-learning teams
- Faculty development departments
- Education technology providers
- Academic publishers and assessment companies
- Teacher training institutions
- Government and nonprofit education organizations
Best-fit industries from the provided industry list:
- Higher Education
- Education Management
- E-Learning
- Primary/Secondary Education
- Computer Software
- Information Technology & Services
- Professional Training & Coaching
- Research
- Publishing
- Nonprofit Organization Management
Quality rating for B2B audience-fit value: 8.5/10
Why the rating is strong:
- International audience with credible academic and institutional affiliations
- Strong concentration of teaching, learning, and curriculum professionals
- Good fit for education technology, training, publishing, and institutional services
- Better buyer quality than broad public education events
Main caution:
- Footfall is likely moderate rather than massive
- Some attendees may be researchers or presenters without direct budget ownership
- Best results come from filtering toward institutional decision-makers, partnership leaders, and learning-innovation stakeholders
If you share the client website, we can next refine this into a buyer-specific target account list, best job titles, best industries, and strongest outreach angle for this event.
Data sheet
| Event Name | 11th International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education |
| Event Date | Not publicly confirmed in the materials reviewed for this brief. Verify exact dates on the official event website before campaign launch. |
| Event Status | Verification required on official event page |
| Venue | Venue not publicly confirmed in the materials available for this brief |
| City | Stockholm |
| State / Region | Stockholm County |
| Country | Sweden |
| Organizer | Organizer name should be verified on the official event website for the 11th edition |
| Official Event Website | See Sources & Verification Notes |
| Event Type | Education conference; academic research conference; teacher development forum; higher education and learning innovation event |
| Primary Category | Education & Training |
| Secondary Applicable Categories | IT & Technology; Science & Research |
| Audience Reach | International academic and professional education audience; likely strongest participation from Europe with broader global research interest |
| Estimated Attendance / Expected Footfall | Estimated 150–350 attendees based on the event format described by the user and the typical scale of focused international academic conferences. Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Attendance Data Reliability | Estimated |
| Main Purpose of Event | To convene educators, researchers, instructional innovators, and institutional decision-makers around teaching practice, curriculum development, digital learning, pedagogy research, faculty development, and academic collaboration. |
The 11th International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education is a specialized international conference focused on pedagogy, learning innovation, curriculum design, teacher development, educational research, and classroom or institutional transformation. Based on the event title and the user-provided event description, it appears positioned as a scholarly and practitioner-oriented meeting rather than a large commercial expo.
For lead generation and attendee profiling, the event matters because it attracts high-intent professional participants who influence teaching practice, academic strategy, digital learning adoption, research collaboration, and faculty capability-building. The strongest commercial relevance is typically with higher education institutions, academic departments, learning and development leaders, instructional design teams, edtech stakeholders, and education consultants rather than pure procurement-only audiences.
| Buyer / Attendee Segment | Typical Organizations | Buying Role or Influence | Relevance to Exhibitors / Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| University faculty and lecturers | Universities, colleges, research institutes | Strong influence on teaching methods, assessment tools, digital content, and course delivery platforms | High relevance for learning tools, courseware, academic publishing, and teaching support solutions |
| Academic administrators | Provost offices, deans, teaching and learning centers | Budget influence and institutional approval authority | Key for institution-wide adoption, pilot programs, and strategic partnerships |
| Instructional designers and e-learning specialists | Universities, online learning units, training providers | Direct evaluators of LMS tools, content systems, student engagement solutions, and assessment platforms | Very strong fit for edtech and digital pedagogy suppliers |
| Teacher educators and faculty development leaders | Teacher training institutes, professional development centers | Influence training frameworks, educator upskilling, and professional learning programs | Strong fit for coaching, certification, workshops, and instructional improvement services |
| School leaders and principals | Independent schools, public school systems, international schools | Decision-makers for classroom tools, staff training, and school-wide pedagogy initiatives | Relevant where K-12 learning innovation is part of event content |
| Education researchers and PhD scholars | Universities, research centers, think tanks | Research influence rather than direct procurement authority | Useful for partnerships, pilot studies, evidence-building, and academic credibility |
| Edtech solution stakeholders | Learning technology firms, academic software vendors, content platforms | Partnership and channel influence more than end-buying in some cases | Relevant for integrations, reseller relationships, and ecosystem positioning |
| Education consultants and trainers | Consulting firms, professional training organizations | Advisory influence on institutional change and solution selection | Good for referral channels, implementation support, and co-delivery partnerships |
| International academic network participants | Associations, exchange networks, conference presenters | Influence collaboration and cross-border program development | Useful for international partnerships and regional market entry in education |
| Geographic Area | Likely Attendee Origin | Buyer Concentration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stockholm | Local universities, education providers, schools, learning centers | Moderate | Strong local relevance due to concentration of academic institutions and international accessibility |
| Stockholm County / Greater Stockholm | Regional faculty, administrators, teacher trainers, education consultants | Moderate to High | Likely nearby draw for one- to three-day academic participation |
| Sweden | National higher education and school leadership audience | High | National participation likely where presenters or delegates are accepted through international academic submission processes |
| Nordic Region | Delegates from Denmark, Norway, Finland, Iceland | High | Stockholm is a practical regional hub for education conferences |
| Europe | International university faculty, researchers, and education innovation leaders | High | Likely primary international attendee catchment |
| Global | Selected participants from North America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Africa | Medium | International conference branding suggests broader submission and attendance potential, but exact country mix is not publicly confirmed in this brief |
| Reach Level | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Global | Primary classification | The event title and positioning indicate an international academic conference, implying cross-border paper submissions, speaker participation, and delegate interest. |
| European / Nordic | Secondary practical reach | Stockholm location likely strengthens attendance from Sweden and nearby European education markets. |
| Buyer Company / Organization | Buyer Type | Why It Is Relevant | Website | Best Job Titles to Target | Evidence Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stockholm University | University | Relevant local higher education institution in the host city with likely interest in teaching innovation, pedagogy, and academic development | su.se | Dean, Director of Teaching and Learning, Instructional Designer, Head of Digital Education | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| KTH Royal Institute of Technology | University | Major Stockholm-based institution with active digital learning, faculty development, and higher education innovation functions | kth.se | Vice President Education, E-learning Manager, Faculty Development Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Karolinska Institutet | University / Medical Education Institution | Relevant for teaching excellence, curriculum reform, and digital learning in specialized higher education | ki.se | Program Director, Educational Developer, Digital Learning Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Södertörn University | University | Regional fit for pedagogy, higher education development, and academic collaboration | sh.se | Dean, Teaching and Learning Manager, Lecturer Development Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Uppsala University | University | Large Swedish university with strong relevance to teaching and learning innovation | uu.se | Director of Education, Educational Technologist, Faculty Development Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Gothenburg | University | Relevant Swedish institution for pedagogy research and educational practice exchange | gu.se | Head of Teaching Innovation, Program Director, Instructional Designer | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Lund University | University | Strong fit for research-led teaching development and academic digital transformation | lu.se | Vice Dean Education, Center for Teaching Lead, E-learning Strategist | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Linköping University | University | Relevant for educational design, faculty training, and learning technology adoption | liu.se | Educational Developer, Learning Experience Lead, Academic Program Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Aalto University | University | Nordic institution likely relevant to an international teaching and education conference | aalto.fi | Dean, Digital Learning Director, Faculty Support Lead | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Helsinki | University | Relevant Nordic higher education buyer-side institution for pedagogy and digital learning solutions | helsinki.fi | Director of Education, Instructional Designer, Head of Learning Services | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Oslo | University | Likely fit within Nordic and European academic travel range for this type of event | uio.no | Academic Director, Learning Innovation Lead, Program Administrator | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| University of Copenhagen | University | Relevant higher education institution for teaching innovation and faculty development outreach | ku.dk | Dean, Center for Teaching and Learning Lead, Education Technology Manager | Strong Market Fit, Attendance Not Confirmed |
| Priority | Job Title / Function | Department | Seniority Level | Why This Role Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vice Provost for Education / Vice Rector | Academic Leadership | Executive | Influences institutional learning strategy, policy, and education investment priorities |
| 2 | Dean / Associate Dean for Teaching and Learning | Academic Affairs | Senior | Controls faculty initiatives, teaching quality programs, and departmental adoption decisions |
| 3 | Director of Teaching and Learning | Teaching & Learning Center | Director | Core operational buyer/influencer for pedagogy support, faculty development, and learning tools |
| 4 | Instructional Designer | E-learning / Academic Support | Manager / Individual Contributor | Hands-on evaluator of course design, content platforms, assessment workflows, and engagement tools |
| 5 | Head of Digital Education / E-learning Manager | Digital Learning | Director / Manager | Strong influence over LMS, virtual learning environments, and digital teaching implementation |
| 6 | Faculty Development Manager | Professional Development | Manager | Key buyer for training, workshops, coaching, and teaching excellence programs |
| 7 | Program Director / Academic Program Manager | Academic Programs | Manager / Director | Influences curriculum structure, course improvement, and assessment reform |
| 8 | Professor / Senior Lecturer | Academic Faculty | Senior / Mid-Level | Important adopters and champions for pilot usage and peer influence |
| 9 | Chief Information Officer / IT Director | Information Technology | Executive / Director | Relevant where integrations, security, systems procurement, or campus-wide platforms are involved |
| 10 | Education Consultant | Consulting / Advisory | Manager / Senior | Valuable channel partner and advisor to institutional buyers |
| Priority | Apollo Industry | Why It Fits the Event | Best Buyer Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Higher Education | Core target segment for university faculty, administrators, and teaching centers | Institutional academic buyers and learning innovation leaders |
| 2 | Education Management | Fits school groups, education operators, academic administration bodies | Administrative and institutional decision-makers |
| 3 | E-Learning | Directly aligned to online learning, instructional design, and teaching delivery modernization | Digital course delivery and learning platform buyers |
| 4 | Information Technology & Services | Relevant for education technology support, systems integration, and digital infrastructure | Campus IT and digital transformation stakeholders |
| 5 | Computer Software | Useful for edtech vendors, assessment platforms, and academic software buyers or partners | Product evaluation and platform partnerships |
| 6 | Research | Academic research centers and educational studies units are likely participants | Pilot studies, academic partnerships, evidence-led adoption |
| 7 | Professional Training & Coaching | Relevant for teacher development providers and faculty upskilling services | Workshop delivery, educator training, certification support |
| 8 | Management Consulting | Fits education advisory firms supporting institutional improvement programs | Consulting-led referrals and transformation initiatives |
| 9 | Government Administration | Useful where public education authorities or ministry-linked participants are involved | Public education program influence and policy alignment |
| 10 | Nonprofit Organization Management | Relevant for associations, foundations, and academic networks in education development | Program partnerships, grants, and educational outreach |
| Metric | Figure | Status | Source / Basis | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated total footfall | 150–350 | Estimated | User-provided benchmark for a focused international academic conference | Attendance figure not publicly confirmed by the organizer. |
| Exhibitor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified exhibitor prospectus or live exhibitor directory reviewed for this brief | This appears to be conference-led rather than expo-led |
| Buyer count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No official buyer or delegate segmentation data reviewed for this brief | Buyer influence is more academic and institutional than procurement-only |
| Speaker count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | Requires official agenda or speaker directory for the 11th edition | Academic conferences commonly include parallel paper presenters and keynote speakers |
| Sponsor count | Not publicly confirmed | Unconfirmed | No verified sponsor listing reviewed for this brief | May be limited if event is academically organized |
| Historical attendance | Not publicly confirmed | Historical evidence unavailable in reviewed materials | Official prior-year statistics should be used if the organizer publishes them | Use with caution until organizer confirmation is available |
| Focus Area | Typical Buyer Need | Buyer Engagement Opportunity | Relevant Supplier Offering |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching innovation | Better classroom engagement, active learning, improved outcomes | Demonstrate practical pedagogy enhancements and evidence-backed outcomes | Faculty training, teaching frameworks, classroom engagement tools |
| Digital learning | Online delivery, blended learning, scalable learner support | Position platforms that improve course design and learner interaction | LMS-related tools, virtual learning systems, digital content delivery |
| Curriculum development | Program redesign, skills alignment, assessment modernization | Offer consulting or data-supported curriculum improvement models | Curriculum design advisory, assessment solutions, content mapping tools |
| Faculty development | Upskilling educators in new methods and technologies | Promote training programs, certifications, and coaching models | Workshops, professional learning, train-the-trainer offers |
| Assessment and feedback | Better measurement, timely feedback, academic integrity | Show how tools improve speed, fairness, and learning quality | Assessment platforms, rubric systems, analytics dashboards |
| Research collaboration | Publication, funding, joint innovation projects | Approach research-active delegates for pilots and validation studies | Research partnerships, grant collaboration, pilot implementation support |
| Institutional transformation | Scaling innovation across faculties and departments | Target senior academic and administrative leaders with strategic value messaging | Change management, strategy consulting, enterprise education platforms |
| Factor | Assessment | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer relevance | High | Strong if the offer relates to pedagogy, faculty development, digital learning, academic services, or education consulting. |
| Decision-maker availability | Medium to High | Senior academic leaders may attend, but many delegates are also influencers rather than final procurement approvers. |
| Data collection potential | Medium | Good if speaker lists, accepted-paper affiliations, or attendee directories are published; weaker if access is limited to academic registrations only. |
| Apollo targeting potential | High | Universities, training institutions, edtech providers, and education administrators can be segmented effectively by industry and title. |
| Geographic targeting potential | High | Stockholm, Sweden, the Nordics, and Europe are practical target regions for pre- and post-event outreach. |
| Best outreach approach | High | Thought-leadership-led outreach works better than hard selling: use research relevance, teaching outcomes, and peer adoption proof. |
| Overall lead quality | High | Valuable niche audience with concentrated relevance for education-focused suppliers and service providers. |
| Best use case | High | Ideal for education-sector lead generation, academic partnership outreach, faculty development offers, and edtech buyer profiling. |
| Limitations / risks | Medium | This is not a mass-market expo. Direct procurement data may be limited, and institutional buying cycles can be slow and committee-led. |
| Filter Type | Recommended Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo industries | Higher Education; Education Management; E-Learning; Information Technology & Services; Computer Software; Research; Professional Training & Coaching; Management Consulting; Government Administration; Nonprofit Organization Management | Build a core education innovation audience plus adjacent influencers and partners |
| Departments | Education; Academic Affairs; Information Technology; Program Management; Learning & Development; Operations | Capture academic decision-makers and operational influencers |
| Seniority | CXO; VP; Director; Head; Manager; Senior; Owner where relevant for consulting or training firms | Prioritize strategic and budget-influencing contacts |
| Job titles | Vice Provost for Education, Vice Rector, Dean, Associate Dean, Director of Teaching and Learning, Instructional Designer, Head of Digital Education, E-learning Manager, Faculty Development Manager, Program Director, Academic Director, CIO, IT Director, Educational Developer | Improve precision around likely institutional buyers and influencers |
| Geography | Sweden; Stockholm; Nordic countries; broader Europe | Align with likely conference attendance catchment and event relevance |
| Employee size | 51-200; 201-500; 501-1000; 1001-5000; 5001+ | Capture institutions and mid-to-large education organizations with formal programs and budgets |
| Keywords | teaching and learning, pedagogy, curriculum, instructional design, faculty development, digital education, online learning, blended learning, assessment, educational technology, learning innovation | Narrow to education-change stakeholders most aligned with the event theme |
| Technologies, if relevant | LMS, virtual learning environment, video learning, assessment platform, classroom engagement software | Useful where the client sells education technology or integration services |
| Revenue range, if relevant | Use selectively; often less reliable for public universities | Better to prioritize institution type, size, and role rather than revenue alone |
| Company type | Public institutions, private universities, training providers, nonprofits, education consultancies | Helps separate buyer institutions from vendor ecosystem targets |
| Source | Type | What It Verified | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| NTTE Conference Official Website | Official event website | Primary event title, positioning, and conference theme should be verified here before outreach | High for official event data once reviewed live |
| Visit Sweden | Official destination resource | Country-level location validation for Sweden | High |
| Visit Stockholm | Official destination resource | City-level validation for Stockholm as the stated host location | High |
| User-provided event description | Provided reference note | Event type, likely audience profile, and estimated scale context used for provisional analysis | Medium; useful for planning, but not a substitute for official confirmation |
🎯 Selling to this event's audience? Get a free tailored buyer list
Tell us your work email and our AI instantly builds a buyer list matched to 11th International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education — the best‑fit companies to target, the exact decision‑maker job titles, and the industry filters that fit what you sell.